You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
Saudi Arabia denies buying nukes
2005-02-10
"We have no need to buy nukes. We can lease them a very reasonable rates."
Saudi Ambassador to Pakistan Ali Awaad Aseeri on Monday denied a report by Time magazine that the Kingdom was trying to buy nuclear weapons through AQ Khan's network. "The basic objective of this report is to tarnish the Kingdom's image and frustrate its efforts at making the region free of weapons of mass destruction," the ambassador told Okaz in a telephone interview. Aseeri said the Kingdom had been in the forefront of countries seeking to make the Mideast a nuclear arms-free region. "Why would the Kingdom try to get this kind of weapon when it openly opposes the principle of possessing, manufacturing or proliferating weapons of mass destruction at the regional and international levels," he asked. "The Kingdom has always been seeking world domination peace and security," he added.

Meanwhile, Pakistan said on Wednesday that the case of nuclear scientist AQ Khan was still open, but it has received no new evidence to suggest that his black market network had sold technology to more countries than earlier thought. Last February, President Gen Pervez Musharraf pardoned AQ Khan after he confessed to supplying sensitive technology to Iran, Libya and North Korea. But this week Time magazine reported that US officials were also investigating whether the scientist's network might have supplied Saudi Arabia and other Arab countries, such as Egypt. On Wednesday, Pakistani Foreign Ministry spokesman Masood Khan said AQ Khan's "case is still open".

"We will quiz any of our scientists if somebody comes up with evidence to prove his links with the proliferators of nuclear technology," the spokesman said. But he said the government had "received no new evidence from any country, individual or organisation, including the IAEA" — referring to the UN nuclear watchdog, the Vienna-based International Atomic Energy Agency. AQ Khan, who was once regarded as a national hero for his role in making Pakistan a nuclear power, has lived under virtual house arrest in Islamabad for the past year. On Monday, Pakistan denied that AQ Khan's network was still operating.
Posted by:Fred

#10  All the good chew toys end up out of reach.
Posted by: Tom   2005-02-10 11:34:20 PM  

#9  skeered em off
Posted by: Frank G   2005-02-10 11:27:38 PM  

#8  Hey, IToldYouSo, c'mon back.

Post your half-assed brain-farts. It's cool. No one else gives a shit - so I give up. Wank away. Have fun.
Posted by: .com   2005-02-10 11:22:33 PM  

#7  Lol! Sigh. Where would us poor stupid toad Rantburgers be without you, IToldYouSo?

Pray, tell more! Explain why this isn't merely your Western brain-fart version and reflects Arab - Persian sentiments beneath the circle-jerk level of Ayatollahs. Obviously, Arab-Persian relations began when you began thinking about it. All those centuries of rivalry, hate, and conflict - not to mention that pesky little war don't count. Of course not.

Your bona-fides, please...

Please, tell us more about yourself - I find your idea fascinating - and convenient as hell - it's so Western and, therefore, so easy to follow... to think I discarded it back in 1980 during the Iran-Iraq War... all that effort of putting on Arab and Persian slippers avoided! Whew! Great!

So, let 'er rip! It's GREAT to have an expert show up who can make it all clear and easy to grasp! Speak! Speak!

All deluded Rantgurgers hate the transient comfort of illusion! Help Us!

BTW, you sound a lot like a guy who showed up here several months back and started out by posting this same Western Conventional Wisdom of a Qom-dominated Iraq. He also stated that Shi'a were the majority in the GCC, etc. He was a jackass, wrong from start to finish. You're not him, back with a new nym and riding the MSM skeer stories of Shi'a shenanigans, are you?

Naw, of course not.

Enlighten us with the facts, not mere speculative observations, that underpin your earth-shattering insights.
Posted by: .com   2005-02-10 9:39:40 PM  

#6  Hey Fred, the ad hominem spewers aren't balancing same with informative posts. Isn't that chippy "troll" conduct?

As a retired intelligence professional, you would be well aware that the Iraqi-Shiites-hate-Persian-Shiites line is pure spin. The cultural inter-change at the Ashoura blood fests attests to the budding unity, cum alliance, at the expense of American taxpayers. Al-Sistani is Persian; born and raised. Islamofascist tyranny has never been stronger, since the State Department sandbagged secularism in Iraq. Come on! Don't let Rantburgers rest in the transient comfort of pure illusion.
Posted by: IToldYouSo   2005-02-10 8:46:15 PM  

#5  We are interrupting this thread for a test of the emergency Shatner cliche broadcast:

Khnnnnnnnnnnnnn!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Thank you, you may now continue with the thread.
Posted by: AJackson   2005-02-10 8:23:00 PM  

#4  I always thought it was Life, Death, Infinity, CBS. Wait a second... no that was Makus Sickby by M.D. I'll research.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-02-10 3:35:05 PM  

#3  IToldYouSo, dear, please spend some time reading the Rantburg archives. Of course you know a great deal, but you do want to make certain, with a nym like that, that you are actually telling us things we don't already know.
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-02-10 2:56:38 PM  

#2  And there you have it. Life, Death, Infinity, Dr Kildare. Deep. Pithy. Principled. You were warned.
Posted by: .NoYouDidnt   2005-02-10 2:06:07 PM  

#1  The Sauds financed the Paki intelligence theft from the Atomic Energy Commission of Canada, that led to the develop of the "Islamic Bomb." The principle of quid pro quo dictates that the Sauds got something for their money.
Posted by: IToldYouSo   2005-02-10 3:01:15 AM  

00:00