You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Chirac Annoys The Swiss
2005-01-28
Why should they be any different?
A proposal by French President Jacques Chirac to tax countries which retain banking secrecy has caused controversy in Switzerland. The Swiss finance minister and banks attacked the suggestion, while non-governmental organisations welcomed it. At the opening of the World Economic Forum meeting in Davos on Wednesday, Chirac put forward a set of "experimental measures" to finance the fight against Aids. He called for at least $10 billion (SFr12 billion) to be spent annually on combating the disease instead of the $6 billion currently spent. Among the measures was a proposal that countries which retain banking secrecy — including Switzerland — be charged for income lost through tax evasion. He also called for a tax on international financial transactions.

Swiss Finance Minister Hans-Rudolf Merz said Chirac was out of his mind had no right to interfere in what was an internal matter. "It's an interference in the internal policy of our country," Merz told the media. "The French president has the right to express himself about these issues, but he has to accept the fact that we have our own policy rules and a clear policy on banking secrecy. These issues can be raised in bilateral negotiations at which we will continue to defend banking secrecy." Swiss banks were also critical of the "bizarre" suggestion and denied that banking secrecy was responsible for a flight of capital.

Michel Dérobert, general secretary of the Swiss Private Bankers' Association said Chirac had "confused separate issues". Swiss Bankers Association spokesman James Nason went further in his criticism: "The idea is rather bizarre and has a ring of Saint-Simon and early 19th century utopian socialism about it," he told swissinfo. "Tax evasion and capital flight are symptoms of internal problems in a country and are not caused by the existence of banks in, for example, Monaco or Switzerland. A far better idea would be if the oh-so-pious French were to impose a tax on nasty tin-pot dictators who purchase real estate on the CÎte d'Azur, topped up with a tax on French bank loans and arms sales to countries with brutally repressive regimes."
Damn! I had to check the original to see if Anonymoose had forgotten to hilite the snarky editorial comments.
But Swiss NGOs welcomed Chirac's ideas as a sign that politicians were taking up the ideas of opponents of globalisation. "It's a very good idea," commented Andreas Missbach of the Berne Declaration. He said that countries like Switzerland that had banking secrecy swallowed up the tax money of other countries, and it made complete sense to impose a special tax on them. The Tax Justice Network said many multinationals managed their business in such a way that they avoided paying taxes in the countries in which they operated. According to the NGO, this tax evasion costs developing countries around $50 billion a year.
Next, he plans to announce proposals for a world tax on tea, pasta, vodka, sushi, and hamburgers.
A tax on tea? Great idea! We'll have a party!
Posted by:Anonymoose

#14  "Tax evasion and capital flight are symptoms of internal problems in a country and are not caused by the existence of banks in, for example, Monaco or Switzerland. A far better idea would be if the oh-so-pious French were to impose a tax on nasty tin-pot dictators who purchase real estate on the Côte d’Azur, topped up with a tax on French bank loans and arms sales to countries with brutally repressive regimes."

Ouch.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-01-28 9:29:22 PM  

#13  I like the photo. "M. Chirac, Karaoke Star!"
Posted by: Pappy   2005-01-28 7:22:53 PM  

#12  Shit, he annoys everyone even the french.
Posted by: John Q. Citizen   2005-01-28 4:14:50 PM  

#11  :)
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-01-28 4:13:57 PM  

#10  Tax other countries! What a concept. Mitch do you work for us? We could call it a flat tax. Pay the tax and you won't get flattened.

Yes, it is extortion, what's your point?
Posted by: The IRS   2005-01-28 4:09:28 PM  

#9  "The youth of Africa, Asia, and Latin America is rightly demanding its entitlement to a future. These populations will put their energy and talent at the service of the future, if they are given the means to do so. If this prospect is denied them, however, then let us beware of the risk of revolt."

In other words
1) They are ENTITLED to assistance from outside.
2) Taxes from outside will pay for assistance.
2) That means outside (other governments) are obligated to pony up.
3) If those someones don't pony up, they are asking for revolt (violence).

Just another politician saying that those who don't hand over their money are asking for violence to be done against them.
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-01-28 3:49:02 PM  

#8  C'mon - is there anybody Jaques doesn't annoy?
Posted by: mojo   2005-01-28 3:40:42 PM  

#7  --That is the great buzz phrase around Davos, the Phrase of 2005 — "silent tsunamis." These are said especially to take place in Africa, and they include hunger, resentment, and disease, particularly AIDS.--

And who's finger is in Africa's pie, Jack-O?

Barney Frank sounded absolutely reasonable.
Posted by: Glemble Phigum3647   2005-01-28 3:10:11 PM  

#6  I think I have a crush on Mr Nason. Don't tell my husband.... ;)
How about a tax on countries that don't produce a single damn worthwhile beer?
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-01-28 2:44:19 PM  

#5  Jay Nordlinger has an entertaining report on the speech.
Posted by: Mike   2005-01-28 1:26:29 PM  

#4  Anything Chirac says is to keep his ass out of a French court room. He has no politics besides staying elected until he dies. Saying things that the Euro elites want to hear furthers his goal.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-01-28 1:24:05 PM  

#3  I found Chirac's discourse....well, taxing.
Posted by: Duke Nukem   2005-01-28 1:15:28 PM  

#2  Could somebody take Jacques aside and remind him that he's supposed to be what passes for a conservative, at least by European standards?

What's with this sudden blizzard of supranational taxation schemes? Has he decided that since that-bastard-Bush has downgraded the importance of national sovereignty, that it means that Europeans can tax *other countries*?

Well, I suppose if Europeans think that they can exercise universal criminal jurisdiction, it therefore follows that they can arrogate universal tax authority to themselves.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2005-01-28 1:11:45 PM  

#1  I think there should be a heavy tax on bald French assholes who can't shut the fuck up.
Posted by: tu3031   2005-01-28 12:14:43 PM  

00:00