You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
HarperCollins retracts book's claim on Saudi man
2005-01-26
NEW YORK - HarperCollins Publishers Inc. Tuesday retracted allegations made in its book "The Terror Timeline" that accused a Saudi billionaire of helping fund al Qaeda and Osama bin Laden, saying it now has no evidence of any such connection. The allegations were made against businessman Mohammed Hussein Al Amoudi, one of the world's richest men, in the book "The Terror Timeline" written by Paul Thompson and published by HarperCollins's ReganBooks imprint last September. They "were based on previously published reports that were subsequently retracted," the publisher said in a statement.

HarperCollins, owned by the Rupert Murdoch-controlled News Corp., declined to answer questions about its retraction. Neither the author or representatives for Al Amoudi were available for comment. The book had been released despite the fact that publishers elsewhere who had made similar allegations against Al Amoudi had retracted them after being sued.

"HarperCollins is aware of no evidence to suggest that Mr. Al Amoudi has ever supported, advocated, or financed Osama bin Laden, the al Qaeda terrorist network, terrorism or terrorist groups," the publisher added. HarperCollins said it would print an errata slip for copies in bookstores and said it would delete any reference to Al Amoudi in a revised printing of the book. The company's statement did not say whether it would pay damages.
Sounds like a first-class screw-up on vetting. Wonder if Mary Mapes was involved?
On Jan. 27, 2004, British publisher Pluto Press withdrew from circulation its book "Reaping the Whirlwind Afghanistan," which made almost identical allegations against Al Amoudi. In its retraction, Pluto said, its allegations constituted "an extremely serious defamation of Mr. Al Amoudi." The publisher said it had agreed to pay "substantial damages."

Several large American newspapers, including USA Today and the Boston Herald, have corrected articles about Al Amoudi's business connections or alleged links to funding terror.
Posted by:Steve White

#3  Well there might be something about smoke being where fire is buried someplace in this story but it is behind this story perhaps.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-01-26 3:42:40 AM  

#2   he definitely threatened to sue them for libel in england where he also lives-- he wears a "golden chain" bigger than mr. T--fred--will you accept service of process for me?
Posted by: SON OF TOLUI   2005-01-26 2:52:21 AM  

#1  ... or maybe he threatened to sue them in the UK, where the truth is not a defense.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-26 1:08:03 AM  

00:00