You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Kissinger & Schultz: The Adults Weigh In On Iraq "Exit Strategy"
2005-01-25
The debate on Iraq is taking a new turn. The Iraqi elections scheduled for Jan. 30, only recently viewed as a culmination, are described as inaugurating a civil war. The timing and the voting arrangements have become controversial. All this is a way of foreshadowing a demand for an exit strategy, by which many critics mean some sort of explicit time limit on the U.S. effort. We reject this counsel. The implications of the term "exit strategy" must be clearly understood; there can be no fudging of consequences. The essential prerequisite for an acceptable exit strategy is a sustainable outcome, not an arbitrary time limit. For the outcome in Iraq will shape the next decade of American foreign policy. A debacle would usher in a series of convulsions in the region as radicals and fundamentalists moved for dominance, with the wind seemingly at their backs. Wherever there are significant Muslim populations, radical elements would be emboldened. As the rest of the world related to this reality, its sense of direction would be impaired by the demonstration of American confusion in Iraq. A precipitate American withdrawal would be almost certain to cause a civil war that would dwarf Yugoslavia's, and it would be compounded as neighbors escalated their current involvement into full-scale intervention.
Posted by:Senator Barbara Boxer

#12  Van,

You are slightly too pessimistic. I suspect the "winds of liberty" will blow stong throughout the Middle East. That should allow us to reduce our time in Iraq to 25 years or so, NOT a century.
Posted by: leaddog2   2005-01-25 6:06:42 PM  

#11  Exit strategy? Exit strategy? First victory, then we'll see.

"Klotzen, nicht Kleckern!"
Posted by: Generaloberst Heinz Gunther Wilhelm Guderian   2005-01-25 6:06:05 PM  

#10  There is no exit strategy, nor should there be. Setting a timetable for withdrawal would be a recipe for disaster for Iraq. It would also defeat perhaps the main purpose of the war, which was to establish a base to fight from in the heart of the Middle East. Unless something awful happens, there will be Americans in Iraq for the rest of the century.
Posted by: Van Helsing   2005-01-25 4:42:38 PM  

#9  Actually there *is* an "exit strategy", but it is a strange one. Compare it to the "exit strategy" of the US Army leaving Germany at the end of WWII. They didn't but they did. Iraq is no longer the issue for the US military, any more than Germany was at the end of WWII. In Germany, not all, but many of the rifles turned east, to the new enemy. In Iraq, it will be the same situation, except the remaining rifles will be pointed towards Syria, Iran, Central Asia, or Northern Africa, wherever necessary. The new "Iraq Regional Commander" is a regional command (3 star), equal to CENTCOM in stature, but separate from the "Iraq National Commander" (2 star), who will report to him. Divisions will be semi-permanently garrisoned in Iraq with a Status of Forces agreement, much like they are in Germany. So all told, the "exit strategy" is a rotation policy.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-01-25 4:10:54 PM  

#8  Direct hit, Pappy, it was Congressional whimpery that resulted in our pulling defeat from the jaws of victory. Killng untold numbers of our friends and allies in South Vietnam in the process.

Some things about Congressional Dummycrats never change, just ask me. -- Calif BB
Posted by: Senator Barbara Boxer   2005-01-25 2:39:56 PM  

#7  Let's see - Kissinger was responsible for the disastrous withdrawal from Vietnam...

ZF, didn't the failure of Congress to fund Vietnamisation of the war also have something to do with it? Not being ornery, just not sure he was wholly responsible.
Posted by: Pappy   2005-01-25 1:17:53 PM  

#6  The proper exit strategy in war is always victory.
Posted by: Gen. Karl Phillip Gottlieb von Clausewitz   2005-01-25 1:05:35 PM  

#5  Actually, ZF, I think everyone's well aware of Kissinger and Schultz's disastrous record, which is why IMO these two are trying to atone for their failures by contributing something sane and reasonable to the debate. Specifically by administering a pre-emptive bitch-slap to Scowcroft, Zbiggy, Baker and their pseudo-realpolitiker groupies in Congress, the NYT and WaPo.
Posted by: lex   2005-01-25 12:21:26 PM  

#4  Let's see - Kissinger was responsible for the disastrous withdrawal from Vietnam and Shultz was responsible for the other disastrous withdrawal from Lebanon. Vietnam and Lebanon made Uncle Sam's name synonymous with weakness, failure and defeat. And now they presume to lecture us about another disastrous withdrawal? I guess they would be qualified - they appear to know a thing or two about disastrous withdrawals.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-01-25 12:17:54 PM  

#3  Watch for NPR and Gail Collins of the NYT to distort Kissinger's advice as she did in the runup to the war. Kissinger said explicitly, with a few caveats, in a WaPo editorial that he supported the war, and the next day NPR, Collins and Howell Raines spun his caveats as "Leading Republicans Oppose Iraq War."
Posted by: lex   2005-01-25 12:16:24 PM  

#2  "Exit strategy" is generally a useless/dangerous concept, except as applied to very minor military interventions, or to most humanitarian assistance operations.

Posted by: Verlaine in Iraq   2005-01-25 12:13:01 PM  

#1  I want the exit strategy for Germany, first troops in 1945. First in, first out.
Posted by: Whick Sneth4832   2005-01-25 12:10:24 PM  

00:00