You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Sunni alienation grows as Iraq elections draw closer
2005-01-22
Actually, I consider alienation a good sign. Eventually it leads to ennui, then to cafard, and eventually to a hose running from the exhaust pipe to the driver's side window. Perhaps we should buy some flowers in anticipation?
In the main hub of Iraq's Shia-dominated south, Sunni politicians work secluded in a heavily guarded compound on a street strewn with the wreckage of a recent suicide car bombing. The Iraqi Islamic Party's fortress-like headquarters reflect the plight of Saddam Hussein's Sunni minority, increasingly embattled in the countdown to January 30 elections that majority Shias embrace but most Sunnis are shunning. Bearded party leaders accuse US-led occupiers and Iraq's interim government of favouritism toward the Shias, who will cement their new-found hold on power after decades of oppression under Saddam. They also complain of growing intimidation by militias run by Shia religious parties and fledgling security forces filling their ranks with mostly Shia recruits — trends that are deepening the Sunnis' sense of alienation in the new Iraq.

Many Sunnis, who made up the backbone of the ruling class under Saddam, are boycotting Iraq's first multi-party elections in nearly half a century because of a raging Sunni insurgency they say will make a fair vote impossible. A low Sunni turnout could undermine the credibility of Iraq's new parliament and the constitution it will write. "The election is a farce and we won't participate," said Jamal Khazal Makki, the party's regional chief, in his ornate office as guards with AK-47 assault rifles stood watch outside. Basra, Iraq's second-largest city, so far has been spared the worst of the violence that has shaken Baghdad and the Sunni heartland north and west of the capital. But Sunni guerrillas are now escalating their campaign in the south, threatening coexistence in a city where Sunnis and Shias have long inter-married.
Posted by:Fred

#12  Who said everyone needs to be getting along for an election to be legitimate.

In preparation for the post election questions regarding the legitimacy of the results let me remind the MSM that in the US in 1864, 11 confederate states did not participate in the election that resulted in Abraham Lincoln's second term.

Curious1 over and out.
Posted by: Curious1   2005-01-22 9:04:22 PM  

#11  Right, B-A-R. Someone is taking liberteeeees with the pen in order to further an agenda to discredit an election that is a start to get Iraq out of the hole that it is in. When you have been on top for 35 years on Sammy's coat-tails, taking the good jobs, the graft, and throwing a willing hand in on murders and torture (we are talking shredders, not undies on the noggin), people on the bottom will get their day in the sun. The Sunnis and ex Baathists better hope that they can exist peacefully without retribution for the crimes that were done.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2005-01-22 8:59:16 PM  

#10  Many Sunnis, who made up the backbone of the ruling class under Saddam, are boycotting Iraq’s first multi-party elections in nearly half a century because of a raging Sunni insurgency they say will make a fair vote impossible.

So instead of doing what they can to discourage fellow Sunnis from going the insurgent route, they're going to boycott the election? Sorry, no sympathy here.

A low Sunni turnout could undermine the credibility of Iraq’s new parliament and the constitution it will write.

Err, no. The threat of a low Sunni turnout means nothing more than a temper tantrum, and should be ignored accordingly.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-01-22 8:50:56 PM  

#9  The difference between the Sunnis and the Democrats is that the Democrats would keep counting the ballots until their 20% of the population gets 51% of the vote.
Posted by: RWV   2005-01-22 8:21:19 PM  

#8  Like ed says...you Sunni a**holes....just wait til a Kurd-Shia dominated army, court, and legislature.

Signed...sealed...delivered...the Sunni's a** is theirs.
Posted by: anymouse   2005-01-22 2:34:01 PM  

#7  
Sunni alienation grows as Iraq elections draw closer
And the downside of this is....?

Hey, Sunnis, try thinking about the alienation of the rest of the Iraqis when you clowns thugs ran the country as your personal fiefdom and hell-hole.

Payback's a bitch. Get used to it. :-D
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-01-22 1:28:55 PM  

#6  Somebody call a whaaaambulance.
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-01-22 1:25:51 PM  

#5  If they think they are alienated now, wait till they meet their new Shite/Kurdish overlords.
Posted by: ed   2005-01-22 12:46:39 PM  

#4  Is anyone seeing parallels between the former Bathists and the former majority party in the U.S. (ie Democrats)? They don't trust people to make the 'right' ballots decision and are going to contest the validity of the vote as soon as it's finished. The violence prior to the elections is no worse than any other developing Democracy. Ever see a 'peaceful' Indian, Pakistani, Mexican, etc. election? Oposition parties being bombed, candidates killed, and voters hassled. Heck that's a NORMAL election in Mexico and I don't hear about the lack of validity of any Mexican election. Yes there will be people that can't or won't vote but it's not because we haven't tried and if there is 30-40% voter turnout that would be a HUGE success.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-01-22 12:38:28 PM  

#3  If they don't participate, then you must liquidate.
Posted by: Johnny Crocran   2005-01-22 11:06:12 AM  

#2  It gives the MSM something to talk about that's negative. Wouldn't want to talk about the huge turnout or successful elections by brave Iraqi's...nope, nope...doom and gloom for all!
Posted by: 2b   2005-01-22 10:09:02 AM  

#1  dial 1-800-Wah Waah

It's already clear that this is going to be the talking point for many. That there wasn't adequate Sunni participation so the elections aren't meaningful.
Posted by: 2b   2005-01-22 10:05:54 AM  

00:00