You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Holocaust lessons meet Muslim rebuff in France
2005-01-20
"Filthy Jew!" schoolchildren howl at a classmate. "Jews only want money and power," they tell their teachers. "Death to the Jews" graffiti appear on school walls outside Paris and other French cities. These are not scenes from the wartime Nazi occupation or a fictional France where the far-right has taken control. Outright anti-Semitism like this is a fact of life these days in the poor suburbs where much of France's Muslim minority lives.

After a slow response when this "new anti-Semitism" flared four years ago, France has made fighting prejudice against Jews into a national priority. Holocaust education in state schools now starts with pupils as young as nine years old. But even the best plans for teaching about the Nazi massacre of Jews can fall short when confronted with an Islamic identity spreading among a minority of France's five million Muslims. "It works with those who are ready to listen," said Iannis Roder, a history teacher in the tough northern suburbs of Paris. "But it doesn't work with those who won't listen. They have their minds made up."

Roder is one of several history teachers who sounded an alarm in 2002 about a wave of anti-Semitism among Muslim pupils, much of it a reaction to the uprising by Palestinians against Israeli control of their lands. Their outspoken book "The Lost Territories of the Republic" opened France's eyes to classrooms where some Muslim pupils openly denounced Jews, praised Hitler and refused to listen to any non-Muslim teacher talking about the history of Islam. Such tension has prompted Jewish pupils in these areas to switch to private Jewish or even Catholic schools. "Muslim pupils react less now to what happens in the Middle East," Roder said. "But the situation hasn't really changed. As soon as you talk about Jews in some historical event, there are (anti-Semitic) comments."

Only A Minority Presents Problems
Both Roder and Claude Singer, head of Holocaust education projects at the Jewish Contemporary Documentation Centre (CDJC), underlined that most schools had no problem teaching about the Holocaust and most pupils learned the lesson being put across. "A national survey of history and geography teachers showed that only 15 percent of them had problems teaching about the Shoah," Singer said, using the Hebrew word widely used in French for the Nazi massacre of six million Jews. "The problem concerns not only the Shoah but anything to do with religion," he said. "Some Muslim pupils don't accept being taught about Christian religious life, which is very important to understand the Middle Ages. The Algerian War is difficult, too, as is slavery." The French slave trade is taught in French overseas territories but not in mainland France, which prompts some black pupils here to ask why they study the Holocaust but not slavery. "In general, I think that Shoah education is going well. It's certainly much better than before," Roder said.

France's centralised state education system began teaching about the Holocaust in junior and senior high schools in 1983. Three years ago, faced with the wave of "new anti-Semitism", it added special classes for pupils as young as 9 or 10 years old. Last September, all 5,500 lycees (high schools) around the country received DVDs with excerpts of the classic Holocaust film "Shoah" and related texts to give pupils a hard-hitting lesson in where hateful prejudice can lead. Centres like the CDJC also offer subsidised day trips to Auschwitz with a French survivor of the death camps. Auschwitz is located near Krakow in southern Poland, just over two hours' flight from Paris, and the trip costs only 50 euros ($65.20). "We'll bring several thousand pupils there in 2005," said Singer, who also guides visits to the Shoah Memorial at the CDJC's headquarters near the old Jewish quarter of Paris.

Foreign Jews Praise France
After being heavily criticised for its initial slow reaction to rising anti-Semitism, France has cracked down on anti-Semitic violence and multiplied efforts to teach tolerance in schools. The American Jewish Congress (AJC) lauded France in September for its toughened stand on anti-Semitic crimes and its plan to ban the virulently anti-Jewish satellite television Al-Manar, run by Lebanon's Hizbollah guerrillas. After meeting Prime Minister Jean-Pierre Raffarin and Justice Minister Dominique Perben, AJC Executive Director David Harris said they were "people who understood the magnitude of the problem and were determined to do something about it."

Harris said he understood the difficulty teachers had with Muslim pupils: "Focusing simply on Holocaust education does not necessarily resonate with children from immigrant communities who say they have no historical or cultural connection with it." A month earlier, Israeli Foreign Minister Silvan Shalom said in Paris that France was doing all it could to fight anti-Jewish prejudice -- a calming statement coming only weeks after Prime Minister Ariel Sharon had urged French Jews to move to Israel to flee what he called "the wildest anti-Semitism."

Link To Cambodian And Rwandan Genocides
While some progress has been made, both Roder and Singer said teachers had to work hard to counter anti-Semitic views that pupils pick up in their disadvantaged neighbourhoods. "I wouldn't say any Islamic groups are behind this," Roder said. "I hear things like, 'Don't buy Coca Cola, it's Jewish'. They hear that sort of thing at the mosque or in their neighbourhoods and they repeat it now and then."

"I'm convinced it's not just a problem of Jews and Arabs," Singer said. "There is a wider problem, one of identity. The (Muslim) pupils feel under attack for their identity so they reject out of hand anything that could put them down." One way to get around this could be to introduce pupils to survivors of other mass killings, for example in Cambodia or Rwanda, Singer said. He has already arranged one such meeting for teachers to help them understand the problem of genocide. "The Shoah cannot be allowed to hide all the other horrors concerning other groups," he said. "That's not our goal here." This has to be done carefully, Singer said, because inviting witnesses to other genocides to speak with Jewish survivors runs the risk of diluting the unique nature of the Holocaust. "We must not make comparisons," he said firmly.
Posted by:tipper

#11  Anon, I don't think any holocaust should get short changed in history texts nor should facts be omitted or evil people white washed for PC reasons. As I explained in post #9, I am offended by the attitude of some Jews, per the article, who seek to promote their ordeal in WW II as the worst holocaust or the only holocaust in the 20th century. That is a false presumption.

The best defense against evil "purges" is for everyone to recognize that the all people have the capacity to do evil. No group is perfect or always the only victim. Jews as well as Christians as well as Muslims all have blood on their hands with regards to purges in recent history if we look at holocausts prior to WWII, during WWII, and after WWII.

The definition of "holocaust" is an act of great destruction and loss of life. Mr. Singer would like people to believe that holocaust only applies to the murder of 6 million Jews by the Nazis.
Posted by: 2xstandard   2005-01-20 7:57:39 PM  

#10  I made my initial comment with a strange purpose: not to diminish the Holocaust, but to advance what should be its lesson. To explain, let me go further back in history, to Napoleon Bonaparte. For almost a hundred years, Bonaparte was villified throughout Europe for his conquests. Indeed, many of his methods were vile, and after he was beaten there was an insistence that he be remembered and hated, even by the French, themselves. He is the second most biographed figure in human history after Jesus. Entire libraries exist with only books devoted to his life and wars. But the incredible destruction he brought to a continent has been popularly forgotten--in France he is now seen as a hero, with school teachers becoming teary-eyed when telling their students of "Le Emperor". Even though the truth is still there, in intense detail, it is ignored. Someday, I predict the same shall happen to Hitler, and the Germans will rationalize away everything they can and proclaim him "The Last Kaiser". So where does this leave the Holocaust? As a lesson to monsters like Milosevic, as to *how* to conduct "ethnic cleansing", without making the same mistakes the Nazis made? Instead, the opportunity of the Holocaust must be the literalization of the expression "Never Again!"--the internationalization of "Never Again!", for any genocide, or "ethnic cleansing". Since WWII, there have been several more "holocausts", tyrants still murdering millions because they think they can get away with it. And for a time, they are right. Only the US seems to be willing to bust up such parties, and then only in some countries. But the rest of the world is still content to "deplore", and do nothing more. To change this must become the sole goal of remembering the Holocaust. Not self pity, nor anger at the now-extinct Nazis, but outrage at the neutrality, the indifference or tacit support, given to tyrants who do such things. Only when a military division is immediately deployed to stop a genocide *at its onset*, will rememberance of the Holocaust bear great meaning.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-01-20 6:59:46 PM  

#9  I agree with 2b's posts, especially #1.

I think that the article shows some attitudes that are not very flattering to Jews, quite frankly. Mr. Singer's worry about "diluting" the significance of the WWII Holocaust by referring to other genocidal events is an obnoxious self-centered, self-delusional sentiment. To suggest that Jews have only been victims as well as the only victims in modern history is sad.

Even if one considers the WWII Holocaust by itself, Hitler systematically murdered 3 million Christians, primarily Catholics, in addition to 6 million Jews. Three million is not an insignificant number, and all we read in this article is about Hitler's focused hatred for the Jews. Fyi, the 3 million executed Christians vastly outnumbered the combined number of Gypsies (400,000), homosexuals and handicapped( 10,000 -15,000)killed.

In the early years, most prisoners at Auschwitz were Poles, not Jews. As historian Martin Gilbert pointed out, of the first 611 people who died at Auschwitz, 591 were Poles and 20 were Jews. In the vast body of Holocaust literature little sympathy is ever extended to those 591 victims, and the subsequent 2,999,409 Poles who followed them to their graves. Polish Nobel Prize-winner Czeslaw Milosz expressed his concern about the forgotten victims, lamenting, “when the meaning of the word Holocaust undergoes gradual modifications, so that the word begins to belong to the history of the Jews exclusively, as if among the victims there were not also millions of Poles, Russians, Ukrainians, and prisoners of other nationalities.” Echoing the sentiment, William Styron warned, “To ignore the existence of these victims -- even if it is certain that Jews suffered more than the others -- is to minimize the Nazi horror. It is to underestimate dangerously its totalitarian dimension.”

Furthermore,has Mr. Singer ever considered the contribution of Russian communist Jews to the planning and execution of 2 digit millions of Christians prior to WWII as the Bolsheviks and Stalinists consolidated their power in Russia, Poland, and the Ukraine?

Holocausts are evil blots on human history and we should recognize evil whenever it appeared and not exercise selective memories about such atrocities. To focus only one holocaust diminishes the memory of other human beings who have lost their lives in the course of "purges." Also, not to recognize that evil exists in every sector of humanity is to be intellectually dishonest.
Posted by: 2xstandard   2005-01-20 5:11:28 PM  

#8  Actually, 2b, I saw 49 yesterday, and that was very sweet, drunk or not. :)
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-01-20 3:28:10 PM  

#7  meant to say all comments above - not just "both".
Posted by: 2b   2005-01-20 3:21:42 PM  

#6  I will step out onto the ice here, mindful of my embarrassing comments from yesterday. (I'll leave drunk blogging to Stephen Green in the future).

I agree with both well stated comments above. But I'm going to extend an argument that I make consistently on all subjects. There is no such thing as negative publicity.

The danger of specifically focusing on the Jewish Holocaust, and not on the unjust blame and hatred that caused it, is that it reinforces the very ideas that Hitler worked so hard to spread - Jews are different, Jews are bad, elders of zion blah, blah, blah.

Reinforcing it puts those ideas into the heads of a whole new generation that could have been blissfully unaware of them.

I think it far more beneficial - rather than to keep reinforcing the ideas that Jews are hated by many - - to keep it in context - that it's not about Jews - but about the use by tyrants and demagogues to rise to power using the demonization of "others, not me" to blame.

I understand it's not that simple - but my point is valid and it's one I make consistently. There is no such thing as negative publicity - and if you publicize that people hate Jews - you are spreading the very ideas that you wish to counter.
Posted by: 2b   2005-01-20 3:07:41 PM  

#5  But it isn't about imposing guilt on those who were born after -- more about being aware of the warning signs...

Exactly-many of which are springing up unchallenged today.

So much hatred has been extended towards the Jewish people-for centuries and on many different continents. This is a fact that many Muslims (and Christians as well) ignore in their arguments about the injustices done to Palestinians. Hatred towards Jews is a singular hatred that surpasses in time and scope the hatred shown towards Christians and Muslims and most other religious groups in the world.

I don't think dragging the US into the anti-Semitic camp will help much, though, TW, because so many from the "US" died making sure Hitler didn't succeed. The "US military industrial complex as a puppet of anti-Semitism" argument is one that unncessarily alienates those who fight for justice for Israel and the Jewish people today.
Posted by: Jules 187   2005-01-20 2:17:25 PM  

#4  Why do the Jews remember? Well, in my case, it was my mother and her family who were involved. My father's family was wiped out, so there isn't much to talk about there. But it isn't about imposing guilt on those who were born after -- more about being aware of the warning signs, and what can really happen. Only a few years after WWII ended, the Jews of the Middle East were expelled en masse. They don't complain about it though, because those that made it to Israel at least see the alternative possibility in the numbers etched on the skin of their neighbors' forearms.

Should other holocausts be taught? Yes, of course. And their causes, as an object lesson (dehumanizing hatred (Jews, Gypsies, Croats), desire to remove the entire class containing political opponents to the gov't in power,(Kulaks in Soviet Russia, bourgeoisie in Viet Nam)).

But the extermination of the Jews was the only time such a thing was undertaken by practically the entirety of the nation, and executed with factory-like precision. This wasn't one people attacking their neighbors with machetes and machine guns. The concentration camps were designed by the factory efficiency experts of Ford and IBM, among others, and with the passive acceptance of much of the world. Remember, one reason so so many died is that they had nowhere to escape to; Hitler's original plan was to strip the Jews of their wealth, then expel them to pollute (as he saw it) the territories of his enemies such as Britain and America. It was only when the other countries refused to accept the mass of German Jews that Hitler decided that extermination was his only option to achieve the necessarily Judenfrei nation he desired. He didn't even bother to try that with the Gypsies, as nobody wanted them then, as now (and so 90% of European Gypsies were murdered, and much higher percentage than that of the European Jews).
Posted by: trailing wife   2005-01-20 2:01:00 PM  

#3  I have to question the axiom of the need to teach the Holocaust, as a singular subject, to anyone, even Jewish children. Its rationale is flawed, and it often creates more problems than it solves. First of these is "why teach it?" Is it (a) To convey a sense of inherited guilt to the non-Jewish children?; (b) To imply that Jews are special among the peoples who experience hatred and persecution?; (c) To identify their persecutors *in this case* as being special?; or (d) As a general introduction and ethical opposition lesson to genocide? Second, why is it a *good* thing for Jews to remember this massacre? What *good* has it done other peoples to spend part of their lives fretting over past injustices? For example, the Armenians against the Turks; or, just today, the Moors agonizing over the lack of a Spanish apology from 500 years ago? With the death of the last Holocaust survivor, and the last real Nazi, shouldn't it just become another history lesson, another tragedy in history like so many others? More importantly, shouldn't teachers instead work to prevent such things from happening in the future? For example, Moslems have been slaughtered and enslaved by other Moslems; isn't it more to the point that their teacher teach that *nobody* should slaughter or enslave *anyone* else?
Posted by: Anonymoose   2005-01-20 1:01:20 PM  

#2  continued:

"We must not make comparisons," he said firmly

And why not? By saying this I submit that this man fails to understand the lesson of the Holocaust. It's not just about hating Jews - but about hating. The lesson is that we must see peoples as individuals and we must resist demagogues who whip up divisions among using hate as a tool. It doesn't matter if it's about religion, race, sexuality, or abortion. If you confine the lesson only to your very own group - then you aren't grasping the nature of the problem - stereotyping and blaming anonymous "others" for what's wrong in your world - even if it's just the fat lady in front of you.
Posted by: 2b   2005-01-20 9:54:19 AM  

#1  Such tension has prompted Jewish pupils in these areas to switch to private Jewish or even Catholic schools. heh...the crushing antisemitism of the catholic church.

It's all the same mindset, a socially acceptable group of "others" that it's ok to sneer at and to blame for your ills. In American society - the only groups that it is PC to be bigoted against are Christians and very fat people. If you want to blanketly slur all Christians are narrow minded - that's not bigotry, that's a fact. Two people are standing in front of you, one is grossely obese mother on her way to the PTA, the other is a skinny, drug addict. It's ok to slur the mom.

One way to get around this could be to introduce pupils to survivors of other mass killings, for example in Cambodia or Rwanda, Singer said. He has already arranged one such meeting for teachers to help them understand the problem of genocide.

"The Shoah cannot be allowed to hide all the other horrors concerning other groups," he said. "That’s not our goal here."

This has to be done carefully, Singer said, because inviting witnesses to other genocides to speak with Jewish survivors runs the risk of diluting the unique nature of the Holocaust.

"We must not make comparisons," he said firmly


Christian, Muslim, Communist and pagan massacres need not apply.
Posted by: 2b   2005-01-20 9:42:19 AM  

00:00