You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Global Poll Shows Negative Reaction to Bush Win
2005-01-19
EFL. The BBC ran it, so who knew it would turn out like this?
A majority of people surveyed in a global poll think the re-election of George Bush has made the world more dangerous and many view Americans negatively as well, the BBC said Wednesday.
America: Nation of evil, fanatic, cowboy maniacs or semi-retarded monkeyboys? Or both? The BBC wants you to make the call world.
The survey by the British broadcaster showed that only three countries -- India, the Philippines and Poland -- out of 21 polled thought the world was safer following Bush's election win in November. Bush will be inaugurated for his second term Thursday.
In yours, world.
On average across all countries, 58 percent of the 22,000 surveyed said they believed Bush's re-election made the world more dangerous. "This is quite a grim picture for the U.S.," said Steven Kull, director of the Program on International Policy Attitudes at America's University of Maryland.
Oooooooh... grim. The Thought Police will be by to visit with you, Perfesser.
The survey found that 56 percent of Americans thought Bush's win was good for the world with 39 percent disagreeing.
That'd be a blowout if it were election results.
Traditional U.S. allies in western Europe, such as Britain (64 percent), France (75 percent), and Germany (77 percent), were among the most negative about Bush's re-election. A majority in Italy (54 percent) and Australia (61 percent), which both have troops in Iraq (news - web sites), also thought his win had made the world more dangerous. Anti-Bush sentiment was strongest in Turkey, with 82 percent thinking his win was bad for peace compared to just 6 percent in support. A large majority in Latin American countries, including 58 percent in close neighbor Mexico, were also negative.
Then don't come up here looking for work, amigos.
Analysts said the poll had far-reaching implications, suggesting a serious rise in anti-U.S. feeling in general, with 42 percent saying it had made them feel worse about Americans compared to 25 percent who made it think more of them.
Any names on your analysts? Just wondering.
"Our research makes very clear that the re-election of President Bush has further isolated America from the world."
Except when there's a tsunami or something. Then we're the first people they want to show up.
The survey found that 47 percent of those questioned now see U.S. influence in the world as largely negative. "Those saying the U.S. itself is having a clearly negative influence in the world still do not constitute a definitive world-wide majority, suggesting there may be some underlying openness to repairing relations with the U.S.," he said.
Gee, thanks. Let us know how much it's gonna cost us first though, okay?
Posted by:tu3031

#13  I've taken my own little poll. M-1 Garand says, "Didn't I already shoot half those people?" Damn heavy competition AR-15 says, "You need to practice more. I like Blue Helmets." Mr. .45 was quiet and refused to answer. And Plinky the .22 just kept repeating "Kneecaps! Kneecaps!"

Frankly, I have no idea what their poll answers mean, but then, being a red-stater Imperialist Warmonger, I'm sure that their answers are more important to me than what a bunch of kooks from Eurostan say.
Posted by: Silentbrick   2005-01-19 9:43:45 PM  

#12  How many different ways do we need to say it before "the world" (read: BBC) realizes that WE DON'T GIVE A GOOD RAT'S ASS WHAT YOU THINK!

Get a life. Or better yet, dump socialism worldwide and get a future.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2005-01-19 8:21:00 PM  

#11  Being right is more important than being loved. Why lower our sights to the levels of France, Germany, etc.?
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-19 7:23:58 PM  

#10  Global Poll Shows Negative Reaction to Bush Win

Tibor's Internal Poll Shows Negative Reaction to Rest of Globe (Australia, Britain, Poland and a few others excluded).
Posted by: Tibor   2005-01-19 6:28:46 PM  

#9  Dave D. If Skerry had won it would be the same BS. The Anti-US non stop hate mongering of the all the worlds Press is astounding. Most of it is pure crap too. I has to do with the fact that most other countries need a wookie to look at because their own domestic situation is a total POS. The US makes a good distraction since we are so unlike anyplace else.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-01-19 5:39:25 PM  

#8  "You know, I'm starting to take unseemly pride that Bush's re-election is causing so much wailing and moaning."

Flip that coin over onto the other side and imagine how shitty you'd feel if Kerry had won, and we now had to listen to the EUnuchs' smarmy bullshit about what a "wise" choice we'd made.

[*SHUDDER*]
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-01-19 5:25:23 PM  

#7  Ok...here's my poll....I think Chirac is an idiot, Schroeder needs to learn how to make a marriage work, and Mexico needs to get it's average education level up to the third grade. Oh, and Turkey can go to hell. (Yeah, I know, it already has.....)
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2005-01-19 4:27:01 PM  

#6  I'm with RC! I could care less about a eurostan poll. We had a poll on November 2, 2004 and George Bush won that, end of story.
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2005-01-19 3:36:12 PM  

#5  For terrorists and tyrants, yes.

Gosh, B-a-r, glancing at the roster of UN member nations, that's just about half of them.

You know, I'm starting to take unseemly pride that Bush's re-election is causing so much wailing and moaning.
Posted by: SteveS   2005-01-19 3:35:04 PM  

#4  A majority of people surveyed in a global poll think the re-election of George Bush has made the world more dangerous..

For terrorists and tyrants, yes.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2005-01-19 3:21:14 PM  

#3  Gee with all the positive press we are getting who would have thunk it.
Posted by: Bill Nelson   2005-01-19 3:14:20 PM  

#2  The question here is how the poll was conducted. With a sample size averaging 200 per country, are the country numbers statistically significant? Did the BBC poll people until it got the result it wanted or was the poll a random sample? I think journalists, who are some of the stupidest and most ignorant people around, don't seem to understand that non-journalists have figured out that they are no longer simply reporting the news.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2005-01-19 3:07:12 PM  

#1  Hmmm... I just ran a survey and found that I don't care what they think.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2005-01-19 2:57:48 PM  

00:00