You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Tech
Titan has orange surface
2005-01-16
Pictures snapped by the Titan probe and a low, whooshing sound picked up by an on-board microphone drew gasps and applause from scientists Saturday, as the mission to Saturn's moon continued its breathtaking revelations from more than 900 million miles across the solar system. Data beamed back from Titan, one of Saturn's moons, sketched a picture of a pale orange landscape with a spongy surface topped by a thin crust. "The closest analogues are wet sand or clay," said John Zarnecki, in charge of instruments analyzing Titan's surface.

Scientists at the European Space Agency were clearly excited about the success of the mission, which had confirmed some long-held theories and produced startling surprises. "I have to say I was blown away by what I saw," lead scientist David Southwood said at the agency's headquarters in Darmstadt. "It was an extraordinary experience to look at some of the stuff."

Images taken on descent, from about 12 miles right down to the surface, suggest the presence of liquid, possibly flowing through channels or washing over larger areas, said Marty Tomasko of the Lunar and Planetary Laboratory at the University of Arizona in Tucson. "It is almost impossible to resist speculating that the flat, dark material is some kind of drainage channel, that we are seeing some kind of a shoreline. We don't know if it still has liquid in it." A thick layer of cloud or fog that obscures the planet was found to be hanging at about 12 miles from the surface, but absent closer to the ground. The clouds are most likely methane and dark areas on the surface are "a reservoir" of liquid methane, said project scientist Shushiel Atreya. A boom mike extended from the 705-pound Huygens probe has captured a loud, rushing sound. Mission scientists did not immediately say what it might mean, but instruments on the probe have detected winds of about 15 mph.
Posted by:Korora

#28  It looks a lot like Mars. In fact, I say that when the spacecraft got to Mars, they just said, "To hell with this," and stopped. "Who'll know the difference?"

.com's space.com link had a link to all the raw images down at the bottom. Start here. You realize the thing didn't live but a couple minutes, so this is probably all they have.
Posted by: Angie Schultz   2005-01-16 8:59:32 PM  

#27  No sign of life; no Wal-Mart, no McDonalds
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-16 5:49:57 PM  

#26  ed - also depends upon the capacity of your average Titan, which might not conform to our current definition, heh. SNSFW
Posted by: .com   2005-01-16 5:47:57 PM  

#25  Now, that's the ticket!
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-01-16 5:43:53 PM  

#24  Final.
Posted by: .com   2005-01-16 5:32:09 PM  

#23  I hope NASA has archival copies
Since the images are transmitted by Cassini to NASA ground stations, you could say NASA has the originals. Look for the American flag watermark in all the images.
Posted by: ed   2005-01-16 4:41:47 PM  

#22  I should explain...
It's a short step from holding the raw data until the papers are done... to only releasing the raw data that supports the papers.
In other words, bad science.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-16 4:41:30 PM  

#21  Where the hell are the rest of the images?
They've got.. what.. 5 released?

I hope NASA has archival copies of them.

Maybe they're just inept. I wouldn't put it past them to give their people time to write up the papers before they're released.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-16 4:33:13 PM  

#20  Cans are kinda small...
So the Titans don't like Colt45 40 ouncers.
Posted by: ed   2005-01-16 4:25:52 PM  

#19  Cans are kinda small...
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-01-16 4:02:51 PM  

#18  Better? Heh, heh.
Posted by: .com   2005-01-16 3:59:26 PM  

#17  Tehran, six months from now.
Posted by: Tom   2005-01-16 3:52:12 PM  

#16  Worst case of smog I ever saw. Send the enviro wackos there to picket it.
Posted by: ed   2005-01-16 3:47:15 PM  

#15  looks like teh inside of a Jar of Tang left open to moisture....waitaminute.....
Posted by: Frank G   2005-01-16 3:46:51 PM  

#14  Yeah, just drink the Bud...
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-01-16 3:27:27 PM  

#13  Lol - making shit blurry is tres eazee, lol!
Posted by: .com   2005-01-16 3:24:50 PM  

#12  I dunno, .com, that looked like a pretty good start to me. What it needs is to give the Bud cans a heavy sepia cast to make them blend in more, and to de-focus the can images to match, as nearly as possible, the bad focus of the surrounding rocks. Go for it, Dude...
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-01-16 3:13:09 PM  

#11  Quick note - the original image used for that Starbucks spoof was a nice large wide-angle pic. This is a massively cropped version to suit the author's purposes.
Posted by: .com   2005-01-16 3:01:11 PM  

#10  bad - As you can see from this quickie attempt, there's not enough base image to really work with. Making the cans small enough to fit decently (that desired subtle effect you implied) in this very limited perspective and image size, yields lousy results - you have to make them so tiny as to be unrecognizable. Sigh. Good idea, though, heh. I considered using Heineken, but the following put me off...

nada nailed it: The ESA are a bunch of elitist wankers. If you haven't checked his Space.com link, well, you should. Rather eye-opening for those of us who have spent as little time in Europe as humanly possible (layovers only, heh)... Had they given us something to work with, like NASA does, it could've been fun, not to mention an interesting and even exciting event in human history.

Sorry...
Posted by: .com   2005-01-16 2:59:37 PM  

#9  The reflected light from Saturn is still significantly weaker than direct sunlight. If The Sun was up, then the light was direct sunlight. Most likely ESA chose to land in sunlight.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-16 2:05:23 PM  

#8  Can't kid me. The universe is flat and that moon is make of orange jello with chunks of something in it.
Posted by: John Q. Citizen   2005-01-16 2:05:08 PM  

#7  Even ordinary CCD's are very sensitive, especially when you are doing still photography with long exposure times.
Posted by: HV   2005-01-16 2:02:49 PM  

#6  I'm curious. The Earth is about 93M miles from the sun. Saturn is about 900M miles from the sun. Understand the inverse square law applied for light this seem very very bright indeed. So are we looking at illumination provided by the light reflected back from Saturn, thus the orangish glow?
Posted by: Don   2005-01-16 12:14:23 PM  

#5  The globular clusters have been photoshopped out.
Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-16 11:55:54 AM  

#4  Halliburton's behind it all. But if it didn't work, we'd have to blame Bush, of course.

Here's a link to an interesting article on how the ESA presented their findings. I was at work, so I was at the mercy of the internet, but this retired space scientist has some pointed things to say about European culture:

http://www.spacedaily.com/news/oped-05g.html
Posted by: nada   2005-01-16 10:48:45 AM  

#3  Where are the puppet masters?
Posted by: Deacon Blues   2005-01-16 9:13:33 AM  

#2  Someone ought to photoshop this photograph with a half-buried can of Bud Light. ;o)
Posted by: badanov   2005-01-16 9:04:46 AM  

#1  Fake all fake produced in a studio. As proof, where are the UFOs? Where are the little orange-drinking green aliens? And where is Jimmy Neutron?
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-16 8:56:13 AM  

00:00