You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
N. Korea's war contingency plan
2005-01-05
North Korea has set up a new war plan that calls for more underground protection facilities to prepare for a possible U.S. attack on the communist country, South Korean intelligence officials said Wednesday. The 33-page military document, signed by North Korean leader Kim Jong Il in April last year and issued nationwide, also urges the country to be ready to fully mobilize troops, civilians and any other possible resources within 24 hours after war breaks out, according to the National Intelligence Service officials. The South Korean spy agency verified the North's wartime guidelines, which were unveiled by South Korea's Kyunghyang Shinmun newspaper earlier that day, saying the new war plan put priority on a defense posture rather than the previous offense-oriented war scenario.

It is the first time that details of the North's wartime plan have been made public in South Korea, officials said. Analysts in Seoul say the North's new defensive war plan reflects Pyongyang's security fears in the wake of the U.S.-led war on Iraq. "The North's document indicates that the North Korean leadership is fearful about a possible U.S. strike on the communist nation over the nuclear standoff," said Kim Tae-hyun, a professor at Chung-Ang University in Seoul. "The North's wartime guidelines may be an updated version of its previous plans to cope with changed security situations facing the country, such as the war in Iraq," said an official at the Defense Ministry. The "Detailed Wartime Guidelines" was issued April 7, 2004, when North Korea was claiming that it could be the next target of the U.S.-led war against terrorism after Iraq. North Korea has been locked in a standoff with the United States over its nuclear weapons drive since last 2002. When the U.S.-led war started in Iraq in March 2003, Kim Jong Il vanished from public view for six weeks, sparking speculation he was hiding in a bunker for fear of attacks. With Saddam Hussein ousted, North Korea and Iran are the two remaining members of what U.S. President George W. Bush dubbed the "axis of evil." The document was signed by Kim Jong Il in his capacity as chairman of the Central Military Committee of the ruling Workers' Party, ending speculation over whether Kim has inherited the important post occupied by his father, Kim Il Sung, before his death in 1994. Kim Jong Il is now ruling the reclusive nation in the capacity of the chairman of the National Defense Commission and supreme commander of the People's Army.
Posted by:Steve

#11  I can alsmost see Joe pounding these out, hitting the submit button, then falling unconscious to the floor like Howard Beale in "Network".
Posted by: tu3031   2005-01-05 8:58:41 PM  

#10  "O'Reilly-ian DemLeft Betty Crocker/Traitor-crats"

I'm writing that down. That's gonna come in real handy in 2008, I tell ya...
Posted by: Dave D.   2005-01-05 8:49:51 PM  

#9  Reflecting further...
The obvious precedent for "Axis of Evil" was "Evil Empire", driving a signal through a known distortion pattern. I've long thought that there was a second precedent as well, namely "I've just signed legislation...". A certain WH staffer has the background to understand the impact of that one, including likely noting the reference by Yeltsin when he actually did the deed (I watched it live, she probably did, too).

In contrast, it seems that the mad mullahs seem to have reacted a bit differently.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-05 8:49:08 PM  

#8  ROFLMAO!!!

Gawd - I wish => I <= had thought of that! *Bravo*
Posted by: .com   2005-01-05 8:46:54 PM  

#7  This must be the caps tourette syndrome...
Posted by: True German Ally   2005-01-05 8:45:28 PM  

#6  Its broadly the same as for the USSR during the Cold War, as for Radical Islam versus Israel -to take Western Europe means milpol defeating the USA, just as to defeat Israel, andor other ME democracies, the USA and NATO must be milpol defeated first or at the same time! The Iraqi "insurgency" is NOT a popular insurgency - it is mostly pro-Saddam DISGUISED ARMY ELEMENTS, SADDAMIST BAATHISTS, and hardline Radical Islamists from inside and mostly outside Iraq. These "insurgents" are fighting in Iraq because, amongst other things, THEY ARE COUNTING ON THE CLINTONS, THE ANTI-AMERICAN COMMUNITY AND UNO, AND COLLUSORY INTERNATIONAL LEFTS TO LEGALLY PROTECT SADDAM AND EVENTUALLY RETURN HIM TO POWER-INFLUENCE IN IRAQ, ESPEC ONCE AMERICA IS SUBORNED UNTO SOCIALISM AND OWG, ANDOR DESTROYED! IRAQ = IRAN = SYRIA = NORTH KOREA = ... in that these nations' primary response to war with the USA is to tie down US/Allied milfors in PC-incorrect, [nuclearized?] "VIETNAMS" - these Rogues and their PC "People's Wars", where War(s) for [anti-US/WEst/Dem/Capitalism] Global Socialism/OWG = "defense" against alleged US "imperialism" and "aggression", ARE THE ANVIL TO RUSSIA-CHINA'S US-KILLING HAMMER! NO MATTER WHAT PC DIVERSIONARY "INCIDENTS" OCCUR BETWEEN NK AND SK-JAPAN-USA, THE REAL CAMPAIGN/BATTLE FOCII IS DOWN WHERE TAIWAN IS, WHERE US FORCES AREN'T IN STRENGTH! In true Lefty dialecticism-alternatism-alteriorism, the anti-US ME limited wars will be successful "quickies" in favor of the US and US-led occupation, whereas EAST ASIA-POA will be protracted and prob very bloody. AT home, America and her Clinton-alleged Communist- and anti-American American heartland/MidWest have HAIL HILLARY and her O'Reilly-ian DemLeft Betty Crocker/Traitor-crats and anti-Fascist Fascists-for-Communism = Fascistas to contend with while all these are going on! Our warriors are fighting Saddam's army disguised as insurgents, and they will fight Iran or Syria's army disguised as insurgents, and they will fight the Norkies army, et al. disguised as insurgents! FASCISM, includ GLOBAL FASCISM, however temp, = the "NEW COMMUNISM/SOCIALISM" = relabeled by the Failed Left as DE-REGULATED/COMPETITIVE COMMUNISM OR SOCIALISM> is NOT just vestiges amongst others of the CORPORATE-ETHNIC STATE or CORPORATE-ETHNIC SOCIALISM, BUT ALSO CORPORATE-ETHNIC WARFARE, includ but not limited to INTER-/INTRA-CONSUMER WARFARE!? The Left covertly or discreetly acknowledges the superiority of Rightism while overtly-publicly denying it at the same time - you know, secular ethics where one doesn't have to believe in God or morals to tell the truth.
Posted by: JosephMendiola   2005-01-05 8:17:52 PM  

#5  Have at. I'm glad it's appreciated.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-05 7:34:13 PM  

#4  Ditto to what Shipman said. I think the bit about asking the right question came from Aristotle, which only proves that true wisdom never has an expiration date.
Posted by: Ptah   2005-01-05 7:27:29 PM  

#3  Heck of a post Dishman. I'm stealing huge chunks of it.

Posted by: Shipman   2005-01-05 4:45:48 PM  

#2  I sense a distinct advantage to naming them "Axis of Evil" and then taking one out. My sense is that the norks decided they really should seriously consider playing defense.

Where they had previously only asked "How can we take South Korea?", they have now asked "How can we hold out against the US?"

The answer is very different, and not terribly pleasant for them.

In my experience, if a problem isn't truly intractable, the key is always just getting the right question asked. The answers almost always follow.
Posted by: Dishman   2005-01-05 3:45:32 PM  

#1  Page 1: Bend over and kiss your ass good-bye.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-05 2:56:59 PM  

00:00