You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Syria-Lebanon-Iran
A Syrian bomb?
2005-01-04
From Jerusalem Post, EFL:
Much energy has been expended in attempting to block Iran's seemingly inexorable drive toward acquiring nuclear weapons. But there is growing concern that all this activity has merely served to mask a potentially more sinister, more dangerous development: The acquisition of nuclear weapons by Syria, perhaps with the assistance of its Iranian ally. On May 11, US President George W. Bush triggered the implementation of a basket of sanctions against the regime of Bashar Assad that had been approved by Congress six months earlier. Bush cited Syria's support for terrorism, its military presence in Lebanon, its pursuit of weapons of mass destruction and its actions to undermine US efforts to stabilize and reconstruct Iraq. Such activities, declared Bush, are "sufficiently grave to constitute a threat to the national security, foreign policy, and the economy of the United States."

While the Bush administration might have been prompted to act against Damascus because it is blatantly facilitating the entry into Iraq of terrorists who are intent on attacking US forces, there might have been another reason for Washington's attempt to contain the Assad regime. Alarm bells are now ringing in Washington and some European capitals over reports that Syria might have acquired gas centrifuges, which would provide Damascus with the ability to produce enriched uranium for the development of nuclear weapons...

With Washington breathing down Syria's neck, one might have expected the conciliatory message from Lantos to be enthusiastically embraced. It wasn't.
One reason for Syria's obduracy could be that it is pursuing an objective that it believes will turn the tables on America. Damascus might have traveled farther down the road to acquiring nuclear weapons than anyone had previously dared to guess. If Syria has indeed made progress in the nuclear field, it almost certainly occurred via the clandestine nuclear network that was established by renegade scientist Abdul Qadeer Khan, who is revered in his native Pakistan as the Father of the Islamic Bomb. The nuclear supermarket that the Khan network operated over more than a decade covered a huge stage, from Asia to Europe and the Middle East.
Posted by:Steve

#2  Me thinks that Syria got a boost from Saddam's WMD being smuggled into country prior to the invasion.
Posted by: Captain America   2005-01-04 6:20:04 PM  

#1  All this does is bring the terrible logic of The Three Conjectures that bit closer.

It seems increasingly likely that one of these weapons will find its way into the hands of an Islamist outfit. OBL recently got the green light for using nuclear weapons. Does anyone here expect them to hold back if they get one?

There seems to be too many unstable countries going after these weapons, and sooner or later one of them is going to get one and want to set it off.

It seems madness to me to attempt to acquire these weapons - they can't have enough bombs to destroy the US (let alone the delivery systems to get them there), so all this does is make those countries huge targets.

Perhaps the old Star Trek joke about Arabs is a premonition?
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2005-01-04 1:30:06 PM  

00:00