You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
And when the great wave fell back, the UN stood revealed, Notably Useless
2005-01-03
ADLAI STEVENSON once argued that a politician is a statesman who "approaches every question with an open mouth". If the performance of Jan Egeland, of the UN's Office for the Co-ordination of Humanitarian Affairs, is an indication, the same is true of those paid by the United Nations. A week ago, despite just one day having passed since the Asian tsunami, with the reported death toll one tenth of what it is now believed to be, and ignoring the fact that public holidays are never the easiest times to start organising an aid effort, Mr Egeland saw fit to dismiss the reaction of the international community as "stingy".
Posted by:tipper

#9  Trying to contain 1/5 of the world population is not only fraught with danger it's impossible.
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2005-01-03 11:58:43 PM  

#8  Also, one of the key goals here is to contain China. Why include them in the alliance?
Posted by: lex   2005-01-03 11:20:52 PM  

#7  China should not be a member until it can behave like a responsible world leader rather than a Wilhelmine bully/angry adolescent. The fundamental flaw of the UNSC-- including rival nations with diametrically opposed interests and incompatible political systems and then giving each nation a veto-- must be avoided here. The goal is to enable responsible action, not create stalemates.
Posted by: lex   2005-01-03 2:46:52 PM  

#6  Good idea but, other than having a growing economy, what would be the qualification for China to participate?

Having aproximately 1/5 of the human race?
Posted by: mojo   2005-01-03 12:55:32 PM  

#5  Good idea but, other than having a growing economy, what would be the qualification for China to participate?

Good behavior. Beginning with an end to egregious behavior re Tibet, Taiwan, Sudan.

As to So Korea and Taiwan, I don't see them as nations that can consistently and usefully project power beyond their backyard.
Posted by: lex   2005-01-03 11:11:46 AM  

#4  How about adding South Korea? And Taiwan? I think that would tweak the Chi-cons to no end......
Posted by: CrazyFool   2005-01-03 10:54:48 AM  

#3  Good idea but, other than having a growing economy, what would be the qualification for China to participate? As you say, I'd give Mexico, Indonesia and South Africa a few more years to build their democratic credentials before asking them in too. But Australia is fully house-trained - - they should be in now.
Posted by: Peter Carroll   2005-01-03 10:42:22 AM  

#2  The first would be to move almost immediately from G8 to G10 by incorporating China and India. Within a decade, Australia, Brazil, Indonesia, Mexico and South Africa can also be invited.

I've argued ad nauseam for a coalition of the US and relevant Asian democratic powers, including India, Australia and Japan (along with Britain), to address threats in teh near and far east. The response to the tsunami disaster shows this de facto coalition in action. Add Israel and you have a serious, modern, responsible collective security organization that can and will project power across the region to diminish the threats of islamofascist-inspired chaos, Chinese expanisionism, piracy etc.

Admittedly I was wrong about Russia, but clearly an alternative to the UNSC is finally taking shape. Keep it moving forward. Extend and formalize it as soon as the tsunami work is finished.
Posted by: lex   2005-01-03 10:31:13 AM  

#1  One more stone knocked out of the edifice that is the Whorehouse on the East River.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2005-01-03 10:21:11 AM  

00:00