You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Shark attack victim's family against kill order
2004-12-17
The father of a teenager taken by a shark while swimming at an Adelaide beach yesterday says the family does not advocate the killing of any sharks.
Doesn't Bill Murray have a movie coming out along that line?
Nick Peterson, 18, was killed by a shark at West Point beach while riding a surf board behind a boat. The South Australian Government has authorised police and wildlife officers to destroy the shark.
"They only want revenge. Hardly a valid reason for bumping off a living creature..."
His father, Philip Peterson, says the Government should instead electronically tag sharks known to inhabit metropolitan beaches. "We acknowledge that the sea is in fact the shark's domain and we don't, and I certainly personally don't, advocate the indiscriminate killing of any shark," he said. "In this case I gather it's a white pointer or white pointers but at the same time we would like to see funds provided to make our beach safer consistently without argument."
Come to think of it, killing all carnivorous creatures that come within range would seem to accomplish that. But I'm pretty old fashioned...
South Australian Acting Premier Kevin Foley says the Government believes the great white should be killed even though it is a protected species. He has also announced increased surveillance in the area and on the beach after the tragedy. Meanwhile, police have confirmed material found earlier today is not the remains of Mr Peterson.
Who is it? Maybe their kinfolk would like the perpetrator made into soup?
Sea Rescue Squadron searchers spotted a four-metre shark close to shore a few kilometres north at Grange. Police and fisheries officers have been given the authority to kill the white pointer which took Mr Peterson or any other large shark posing a threat to human life. The Opposition supports destroying dangerous sharks but Fisheries Department chief Will Zacharin says public safety, not vengeance, will guide them. "We're not on a hunt here, we're about beach safety and we'll be patrolling those areas to see if there are any large sharks onshore, if we have to respond we will," he said.
"So don't go takin' no revenge on them things!"
Police are warning anyone who is planning to hunt and kill the protected species themselves will face the full force of the law.
How about if they give the critters first bite?
The South Australian Opposition supports the Government's decision to authorise the destruction of the shark. Liberal Leader Rob Kerin has also urged the Government to maintain shark patrols during the summer. South Australian Conservation Council president Jane Corin says nothing will be achieved if the white pointer is hunted down. "If we keep killing the sharks, that species will be removed from our seas," she said. "It is a top predator and plays a major role in keeping the seas free from disease and injured animals. "It's not a course of action that any government should be advised to take."
Do you categorize surfers as "disease" or as "injured animals"?
Posted by:God Save The World

#10  I advocate the total extermination of mosquitoes and sharks.
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2004-12-17 5:53:57 PM  

#9  For every human 100 sharks.
Posted by: Calvin   2004-12-17 1:43:57 PM  

#8  Two problems/points of view.

1) If the shark cues into humans as an easy food source, problems will continue (as SS1654 said). Predators learn pretty quickly which "animals" provide the best feeding targets. If this is indeed the case, they can haul the shark into different waters, thereby preserving its beneficial ecological functions, OR they'll have to kill it to protect surfers and swimmers in that area.

2) Could've been just a one-time attack. Under normal conditions, sharks are the seas' garbage disposals and are needed just as carrion birds are on land. If it was an abberation, killing the shark would be pointless and stupid.

Here in Colorado the authorities usually always hunt down and kill mountain lions that prey on humans. If they don't, the lion "tags" humans as an easy food source. It's too bad, though, because often the lion is a nursing mother and their natural food sources have been so severely diminished by man's encroachment, they turn to what they can get. It ain't personal.

About sharks--they mostly go after anything that moves. Here's an idea: Maybe surfers should stay out of known shark infested waters? Ya can't clear the whole friggen coast line, ya know.

Posted by: ex-lib   2004-12-17 1:41:16 PM  

#7  Bruce?...
Posted by: mojo   2004-12-17 12:18:59 PM  

#6  I'm with you, ed. I kinda had the same reaction when Reginald Denny got the crap beat out of him in LA and then sympathized with the people who did it.
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-12-17 11:37:05 AM  

#5  If they know which shark it is, kill it, because it knows the taste of man now, otherwise don't just kill a random shark for revenge.
Posted by: Shaiter Sholuper1654   2004-12-17 11:31:47 AM  

#4  how can their children and fellow citizens rely on them when human predators come for them?
They can't, these types will be too busy trying to understand "why can't we just all get along?"
Posted by: Steve   2004-12-17 9:41:06 AM  

#3  "we’ll be patrolling those areas to see if there are any large sharks onshore, if we have to respond we will"


"Candygram"
Posted by: Frank G   2004-12-17 9:41:01 AM  

#2  I am rather dumbfounded by Mr. Peterson and Ms. Corin. They would not protect their children from becoming the prey of sharks. If they won't eliminate even this threat, how can their children and fellow citizens rely on them when human predators come for them?
Posted by: ed   2004-12-17 9:31:17 AM  

#1  how convenient, just in time for that new movie coming out about killing the shark. I heard it stinks, BTW.
Posted by: 2b   2004-12-17 9:08:31 AM  

00:00