You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Africa: Subsaharan
DR Congo 'fighting Rwanda troops'
2004-12-14
The Democratic Republic of Congo government says its troops in the east are battling Rwandan soldiers and not Congolese rebels, as had been reported. There have been many recent reports that Rwandan troops had crossed the border but last week, the UN said there was no conclusive evidence.
Well, if you'd just leave the bar and look....
Rwanda has denied that its soldiers are in DR Congo. The latest fighting has raised fears that the deal to end the five-year war in DR Congo could unravel.
Was it raveled to begin with?
The United Nations peacekeeping mission in DR Congo is leaving for the town of Kanyabayonga, 160 km north of the North Kivu provincial capital, Goma, to investigate the fighting, a spokeswoman said.
"Oh, if we must. Be a good chap and pack the tea set."
"The Rwandans have sent soldiers to reinforce the positions they never really left in North Kivu," DR Congo Information Minister Henri Mova Sakanyi said. The Congolese army claims to have captured four rebels, two of whom it says are Rwandans. Last week, confidential United Nations documents said that Rwanda still maintained "military control" in parts of eastern DR Congo through the rebel groups it backed during the war, although this was denied by Rwanda.
Sussssh, don't tell anyone, it's confidential
"There are no Rwandan forces in the Congo. If there are any clashes there it is a Congolese affair. They should sort it out themselves," Richard Sezibera, Rwanda's presidential envoy for the Great Lakes region, told Reuters news agency. Under a power-sharing agreement set up to end the fighting, North Kivu was awarded to the former RCD rebels.
Yeah, Land For Peace, works every time.
It had been reported that the fighting in North Kivu was between regular Congolese army troops, sent to the area to stop the reported Rwandan incursion, and RCD fighters, who were supposed to have been integrated into national army. The United Nations has more than 10,000 peacekeepers in DR Congo but they are accused of not doing enough to prevent renewed conflict.
Really?
Posted by:Steve

#1  the problem is that DR Congo (doctor Congo?) was never really raveled, as you say. Rwanda is going in, to stop radical Hutu guerrillas from using Congo as a base - these guerillas are the same nice folks who committed one of the worst genocides since 1945 a few years back. Rwandas justified if you ask me, as are the RDC they back (though theyve used some unnecessary roughness themselves) Its probably GOOD that the UN troops are looking the other way - lets the Rwandans do what they have to do. What the UN and the world REALLY need to do is to rebuild Congo, so that Congo can stop its territory being used this way. OTOH Congo may be too big, too diverse, to really be rebuilt as a nation. Might be better off splitting it, into 3 or 4 more manageable states.


Think of Rwanda, as Israel but more primitive, sitting next to a Lebanon that about 50 times as big, but even MORE backward.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-12-14 9:38:02 AM  

00:00