You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
UK troops trap hundreds of rebels
2004-11-23
Hundreds of pro-Saddam rebels holed up in the Iraqi Triangle Of Death have been cornered by British troops. The Black Watch and Queen's Dragoon Guards based at Camp Dogwood have trapped a "hornet's nest" of militants trying to flee the Fallujah battle-zone. Military Intelligence officers now believe this is the reason for the ferocious attacks on the Dogwood-based Brits who have suffered daily rocket and mortar attacks. A British intelligence officer in Central Iraq revealed last night: "We have been surprised by the ferocity of the attacks but we are now able to fight back. The force based at Dogwood has effectively closed the back door on ex-Ba'athists and rebel insurgents trying to escape the American assault on Fallujah. What has happened has proven the value of the Black Watch and Queen's Dragoon Guards being there - there is nowhere for the rebels to go. We have blocked off their escape route and that is why the attacks have been so desperate. They were trying to punch through us and haven't done so."

The controversial decision to deploy British troops into the hazardous Sunni Triangle outskirts was aimed at blocking off key insurgent supply routes into Fallujah. But yesterday the first signs the Brits were making headway with their hearts and minds approach started showing as locals welcomed them for the first time. Despite the death toll the troops have suffered both The Black Watch and The Queen's Dragoon Guards have been trying to acknowledge locals as they pass through their villages. In a crucial breakthrough an armoured unit from the Black Watch's Alpha Company was slowly moving through a tiny cluster of farms close to the Euphrates when they waved at families as they passed through. Children and their parents waved back at the armoured unit and smiled.
Posted by:Zhang Fei

#25  :) ah, Mrs. D, you outflank and outclass me yet again. Fine, three legs then, so long as we don't fall between the stools
Posted by: lex   2004-11-23 9:59:49 PM  

#24  lex, it's my dream but only that. Stand alone sunni's would create the new home for Al Q. Stand alone Shia would be annexed into Iran. Stand alone Kurds would invade Turkey. Unfortunately we need the Kurds to threaten the Sunnis with death and the Shia to outvote them. Three legs to the stool. And that is what Iraq is, stool.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-23 9:14:17 PM  

#23  As to the sunnis, they're the bloody Irish in all this. Peaceful ones get autonomy. The others get tanks and H-block

Hahaha very amusing :)
Posted by: MacNails   2004-11-23 8:58:43 PM  

#22  Better to carve up the country if that isolates and separates the sunni problem from the decent functioning of the remainder. Sort of like isolating the IRA in Ulster: peace for 80-90% of the citizenry and hell for the rest is better than misery for 100%.

While we're on the British Isles analogy, there's no reason that Iraq can't have several levels of autonomy, as Britain does. Kurdistan could be like Scotland: an ethnic enclave with its own parliament and tax authority but otherwise subject to the laws of and economically and militarily integrated with a state dominated by a different ethnic group. Fine for the Scots, fine for the Kurds; neither the English/Welsh nor the Shi'a are in any serious way harmed.

As to the sunnis, they're the bloody Irish in all this. Peaceful ones get autonomy. The others get tanks and H-block.
Posted by: lex   2004-11-23 5:03:45 PM  

#21  There must be ongoing kurd on sunni conflict as the Kurds try to move back into the areas Saddam expelled them from

From what I've seen of that, the Sunnis had mostly hightailed before the Kurds even arrived. Didn't like the idea of not having anyone to hide behind.
Posted by: Bulldog   2004-11-23 4:47:09 PM  

#20  A. If Iraq falls apart,and AQ can set up a base there, thats very bad for us. I see no scenario that leaves the Sunnis with their own state or quasi-state. Worst case (and reasonbaly likely IMO) is the Kurds and the Shia carve up the Sunni areas and the Sunnis are relegated to 2nd class citizens.

Its remarkable how little we know about what is going on in Iraq. There must be ongoing kurd on sunni conflict as the Kurds try to move back into the areas Saddam expelled them from, yet we hear nothing about it, even in the Kurdish media.
Posted by: phil_b   2004-11-23 4:43:22 PM  

#19  Me, either, LH. I'm hoping and praying that good can come out of this.

In the word of a wiseman:

"Difficult to say...always in motion, the future."
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-11-23 3:35:25 PM  

#18  that may well be the case Jules. Sometimes you DO have to accept a tactical defeat, and look to the next battlefield. I am not pessimistic now wrt to Iraq, but I cant say that couldnt change. But defeat it would be, if even scenario B takes place.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-11-23 3:30:27 PM  

#17  Those things you say are true, LH, but ulitamtely it IS their challenge.

Do you think our engagement there a time-unlimited proposition? If, over time, the resistance forces are replenished again and again by Iraqis, is it a smart proposition, not only in terms of our national security, but also with regard to our regional foreign policy goals and our interfacing with the Muslim world, to continue on the same path? We give all and they continue to act out like bloodthirsty savages who hate the word "peace"? Are they smart enough to recognize a chance for their families when they see it and are they savvy enough to take it?

My take is that the American people do not mind sacrificing IF it leads to a free, stable Iraq and IF there are signs that Iraq is healing and progressing. But if things get more hostile over the long run or less probable in terms of our strategic gains, continued sacrificial engagement will not fly with Americans, nor should it.
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-11-23 2:17:40 PM  

#16  ...The melting thing..wondering if the bad guys are starting to have to resort to heavier and heavier doses of pharmaceuticals to keep going.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-11-23 2:03:32 PM  

#15  Jules - not entirely THEIR challenge, I fear. A. If Iraq falls apart,and AQ can set up a base there, thats very bad for us.
B.If Iraq stays together, but with Sunnis completely excluded, thats not as bad as A, but reduces the value of Iraq as a model for the region, since most states in the region are Sunni.

Lex - I hope thats possible, but havent really seen any evidence thats happening. AFAICT, most Sunni Arabs support the insurgency, or at best are neutral.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-11-23 1:50:10 PM  

#14  Transform this into a sunni-on-sunni civil war.
Posted by: lex   2004-11-23 12:37:40 PM  

#13  LH-Yep. A big challenge-but it's THEIR challenge.
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-11-23 12:33:00 PM  

#12  It looks like this is a local Newcastle newspaper, a kind of CityBeat thing. In that case the audience will want to know that their boys are making friends in faraway places. Thus, after the hard facts of the hard & effective actions of the Watch and the Guards, a soft bit about how beloved they've made themselves over there.

Only the first part matters, and the journalist knows it. The rest is pro forma...probably something similar in every hard news article in the paper.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-11-23 12:17:24 PM  

#11  in fact this "triangle of death" is (from what Ive read) a mixed area, with a largely Shiite rural population, and townspeople largely Sunnis who were brought in by Saddam as part of a deliberate effort at demographic change. The jihadis have been attacking Shiite pilgrims on the way south from Baghdad to the shrine cities of Najaf and Karbala. No love lost between the Shiite villagers and the insurgents.

I still dont think many people in the US realize the depths of intergroup hatred in Iraq, or its relationship to the current insurgency. We, both on the right and left, tend to think its all about *us* - either THEY love us, or they hate us - not realizing that THEY know we'll be gone eventually, and their relationships with, and hate for, each other is MUCH more important.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-11-23 10:20:14 AM  

#10  It is good news 2b, I think it's just that people are aware of what the MSM ('crucial breakthrough'??) could make of this: "massacre, war crimes, death of innocents, baby ducks!" as well as the danger to troops of suicide attackers and phony surrenders.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2004-11-23 9:34:58 AM  

#9  It is. I think the sarcasm comes as a result of the criticism of US approaches in the north vs. the softer approach of the UK troops in the friendlier Shia south, earlier in the war. It did not go unnoticed that once the Black Watch engaged the southern perimeter below Baghdad, they quickly set aside the berets and took a harder approach when they came under serious attack - an implicit vindication of US tactics in the less friendly Sunni areas.

But that said, it is a good sign whenever the Iraqis welcome our work there.
Posted by: rkb   2004-11-23 9:32:36 AM  

#8  why is everyone being sarcastic? This sounds like good work to me?
Posted by: 2b   2004-11-23 9:00:57 AM  

#7  This sounds like the "anvil" part of the strategy we heard about before we lowered the hammer on Fallujah. Any other reports of Fallujah fascists fleeing into the face of other US or UK troops to the south and east?
Posted by: lex   2004-11-23 8:05:55 AM  

#6  ...but make sure the 'embeds' aren't invited.

As to 'crucial breakthrough' - what a weird turn of phrase.
Posted by: Tony (UK)   2004-11-23 7:13:30 AM  

#5  Time to bring in the Gurkhas to revenge their countrymen..
Posted by: Howard UK   2004-11-23 5:42:12 AM  

#4  Ok, soooooooooo...what are they going to do with them now, feed them crumpets! Keep them boxed in, call the Americans to come in and dispatch the insurgents! No prisoners!! Prisoners equal UN and Red Cross interference and meddling.
Posted by: smn   2004-11-23 4:24:20 AM  

#3  Kalle: This has got to be a joke.

Hey - this is part of the softly-softly approach that worked so well in Ireland. Sorry, I mean Northern Ireland. Even if it takes a hundred years to reach a peace agreement (after giving up most of the island in the wake of centuries of periodic rebellions), it's well worth it.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-11-23 1:54:50 AM  

#2  In a crucial breakthrough ... they waved at families as they passed through. Children and their parents waved back at the armoured unit and smiled.

This has got to be a joke.
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2004-11-23 1:48:46 AM  

#1  Children and their parents waved back at the armoured unit and smiled

Apparently so did the suicide bomber a couple of days ago. Be wary.
Posted by: Rafael   2004-11-23 1:34:49 AM  

00:00