You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Britain
Al-Qaeda planned to hit London before US election
2004-11-22
Note to Dan; I rarely say "I told you so", but guess what? I told you so.
The latest analysis of evidence that led to last summer's Code Orange alert suggests that Al Qaeda operatives were plotting a "big bomb" attack against a major landmark in Britain—but had no active plans for strikes in the United States, U.S. intelligence sources tell NEWSWEEK.
I thought that al-Q might go after the UK to split the coalition and "guilt" US voters into turning on Prez Bush....
The reassessment of Al Qaeda plans is the latest indication that much of the Bush administration's repeatedly voiced concerns about a pre-election attack inside the United States was based in part on an early misreading of crucial intelligence seized months ago in Pakistan. The new view is that there was indeed an active Al Qaeda plot underway earlier this year—one that involved coded communications between high-level operatives in Pakistan and a British cell headed by a longtime associate of September 11 mastermind Khalid Shaikh Mohammed. The plot was aimed at setting off a large bomb at a prestigious economic or political target inside the United Kingdom—in effect to make a political statement against the British government. Among the targets considered in detail by the plotters, sources say, was London's Heathrow Airport, the Houses of Parliament and Westminster Abbey.

But little, if any, any evidence has turned up suggesting that the plotters had taken any steps to attack U.S. financial targets as Bush administration officials had initially suggested. The failure to find any such evidence was a key reason the Department of Homeland Security last week relaxed the terror alert and downgraded the threat level from Orange (elevated) to Yellow (high) for financial buildings in New York, New Jersey and Washington, D.C. Officials also said that another reason for downgrading the alert was that security at the buildings had been enhanced. Homeland Security Secretary Tom Ridge first announced the financial-buildings alert on Sunday, Aug. 1, just three days after Sen. John Kerry gave his acceptance speech at the Democratic Party convention in Boston. Ridge's references to what he called "very specific" and "alarming" intelligence about Al Qaeda surveillance of such buildings as the World Bank in Washington and the New York Stock Exchange set off a new wave of fears about a possibly imminent terrorist attack and, in the view of some, had the effect of substantially suppressing Kerry's "bounce" in the polls.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#5  I'm with Dan. AQ's fifth column hatemongers in Finsbury and elsewhere in the UK enjoy a level of tolerance unique in Europe, provided all the wet work occurs outside the UK. Why mess with a good thing?
Posted by: lex   2004-11-22 1:04:42 PM  

#4  They'd be doing the Brits a favor if they blew up that stupid water ring memorial to Diana.

Sat in Hyde Park by the ring back in the summer, it occurred to me that in the event of a nuclear strike on London, that particualr feature would be one of the very few to survive intact. It may not work, but it's almost indestructable. Shame indeed.
Posted by: Bulldog   2004-11-22 12:57:02 PM  

#3  They'd be doing the Brits a favor if they blew up that stupid water ring memorial to Diana. Typical artiste vision, it doesn't work.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2004-11-22 11:46:36 AM  

#2  At some level the True Believers (TM) are prolly angry at the operatives living the good Western life in London. Page Three wimmin, Euro teevee with all its nekkidness, football, pubs aplenty. A nice big bomb would kill a bunch of infidels, embarass the Great Satan, and send a lot of the al-Q bureacrats running for cover in Pakland and Yemen. Back home where they can go to masjid 5 x a day and memorize some more of the Koran.
Posted by: Seafarious   2004-11-22 11:00:04 AM  

#1   Yes, yes, you did ;)

Though to be fair, I still don't entirely understand the rationale behind such an attack. Even if they killed thousands of Londoners, they still stand to lose far more in terms of infrastructure in London in the potential MI5 retaliation than the UK would in any terrorist attack. IMO, their best strategy would be not to carry out any attacks in Europe, or at least only against those governments they know they can bully. In the event Europe actually does grow a pair, they stand to lose quite a bit.

But then, I'm just a dumb kufr, so what the hell do I know?
Posted by: Dan Darling   2004-11-22 12:05:55 AM  

00:00