You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
ACLU slams Ashcroft comments (on terrorism-advocate judges)
2004-11-12
The American Civil Liberties Union said outgoing Attorney General John Ashcroft showed "his clear disdain for the law" in a speech Friday. In a speech to the National Lawyers Meeting of the Federalist Society, Ashcroft warned about "activist" judges who he said were "encroaching" on the president's constitutional powers. The attorney general did not mention specific instances, but the Justice Department is appealing a ruling by a federal judge in Washington this week that says the administration must follow the Geneva Convention in handling terror detainees, unless an impartial tribunal shows that they are not entitled to its protections.
Never mind that the Geneva Convention simply does not apply to people (like Terrorists) who do not follow it themselves.
"The nation's top law enforcement officer today expressed his clear disdain for the rule of law," ACLU executive director Anthony Romero said in a statement. "The Bush administration and its attorney general nominee should immediately denounce today's comments by outgoing Attorney General John Ashcroft."
Posted by:CrazyFool

#2  ..but the Justice Department is appealing a ruling by a federal judge in Washington this week that says the administration must follow the Geneva Convention in handling terror detainees, unless an impartial tribunal shows that they are not entitled to its protections.

Hot diggety! Let's waste MORE money setting up a tribunal to determine something that could be done by any competent lawyer at a fraction of the price!!!
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-11-12 11:20:57 PM  

#1  Clear disdain for law? Not like the ACLU making law up without the consent of the governed!
BTW the Constitution addresses war powers as those of the Executive and Legislative branch. There's nothing in it which says the Judiciary has any say, except of course what the courts claims for itself by fiat.
Posted by: Don   2004-11-12 7:37:12 PM  

00:00