You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Gonzales to Succeed Ashcroft
2004-11-11
President Bush has chosen White House counsel Alberto Gonzales, a Texas confidant and one of the most prominent Hispanics in the administration, to succeed Attorney General John Ashcroft, sources close to the White House said Wednesday. Gonzales, 49, has long been rumored as a leading candidate for a Supreme Court vacancy if one develops. Speculation increased after Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist announced he has thyroid cancer. Gonzales' career has been linked with Bush for at least a decade, serving as general counsel when Bush was governor of Texas, and then as secretary of state and as a justice on the Texas Supreme Court.
I thought he'd be picked as a Supreme Court Justice, but AG is fine.
Gonzales has been at the center of developing Bush's positions on balancing civil liberties with waging the war on terrorism - opening the White House counsel to the same line of criticism that has dogged Ashcroft. For instance, Gonzales publicly defended the administration's policy - partially essentially repudiated by the Supreme Court and now being fought out in the lower courts - of detaining certain terrorism suspects for extended periods without access to lawyers or courts. He also wrote a controversial February 2002 memo in which Bush claimed the right to waive anti-torture law and international treaties providing protections to prisoners of war. That position drew fire from human rights groups, which said it helped led to the type of abuses uncovered in the Abu Ghraib prison scandal. Some conservatives also have quietly questioned Gonzales' credentials on core social issues. And he once was a partner in a Houston law firm which represented the scandal-ridden energy giant Enron.
Posted by:Steve White

#13  It'll be Estrada on the Supremes, but Gonzales can do plenty of harm as AG too.
Posted by: someone   2004-11-11 11:27:54 PM  

#12  From what I've gleaned, Gonzales is considered a cipher on other fronts besides affirmative action; might be the next Souter for all I can tell.
Posted by: Raj   2004-11-11 7:38:51 PM  

#11  Hey Blondie .... I along with about 150,000 other good people were once employed by Enron .... have to find another reason to knock his crap.
And by the way ... it is crap.
Posted by: leo88   2004-11-11 6:07:10 PM  

#10  I have my doubts for SCOTUS as well
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-11 5:57:05 PM  

#9  Karl R: "Exactly what is your point lex?"

He is saying that Gonzales isn't packing the gear to sit on the bench in SCOTUS.

Is that clarified enough for you?

-AR
Posted by: Analog Roam   2004-11-11 5:38:51 PM  

#8  Exactly what is your point lex?
Posted by: Karl R   2004-11-11 4:15:27 PM  

#7  Ideology aside, I'm not sure he's such a good lawyer. Justice Scalia, among others, gave Gonzales's recommended approach to detainees a pretty thorough bitch-slapping in the recent SCOTUS decisions on Guantanamo. Whatever his political merits, Gonzales is not exactly SCOTUS material.
Posted by: lex   2004-11-11 3:12:22 PM  

#6  Gonzales is a defender of racial preferences, and no conservative.
Posted by: someone   2004-11-11 3:07:14 PM  

#5  It will be interesting to watch the left try to villify him without pissing off the Hispanic community in the process.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2004-11-11 2:49:32 PM  

#4  Dammit--how are we Republicans going to maintain the image of being rich, white, racist males if we keep putting blacks, Hispanics, and women in power? Oh, wait, I just remembered that's another Democrat lie to keep minorities blindly voting for their party. Never mind!
Posted by: Dar   2004-11-11 12:21:34 PM  

#3  Lots of goodwill in the domestic and international Hispanic/Spanish communities as well. A very clever, nuanced move. Especially as the man in question is good enough to support the trust he's been given.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-11-11 11:24:10 AM  

#2  He can still be nominated for the Supremes if he becomes AG. In fact, this is a politically astute move if he is top runner for Supremes. Get all the negatives, dhimmi nonsense, NOW, PETA, Greens, etc. ammo depleted for the AG and leave them with blanks for the Supreme nomination.
Posted by: Jack is Back!   2004-11-11 8:57:07 AM  

#1  Well, Paul Krugman was once employed by Enron, and that hasn't stopped the New York Times and others from publishing his crap...
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2004-11-11 8:13:42 AM  

00:00