You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
Senators Accuse U.N. Leader of Blocking Their Fraud Inquiry (OOJ?)
2004-11-11
EFL
Leaders of a United States Senate subcommittee investigating allegations of fraud in the oil-for-food program in Iraq have accused Kofi Annan, the United Nations secretary general, of obstructing their inquiry.
Sounds suspeciously like Obstruction of Justice. Wonder if Kofi read about Martha Stewart and Frank Quattrone. Those were NYC cases. Turn this baby over to Spitzer for quick results.
The senators also complained that Mr. Annan was blocking access to 55 internal audit reports of the program and other relevant documents and refusing to permit United Nations officials to be interviewed by the subcommittee's investigators. The senators said it had taken four months for Mr. Annan to reply to the subcommittee's requests, and when he finally did, he refused to cooperate with the Senate inquiry. "We are concerned that the U.N.'s nondisclosure policy is being used as both a sword and a shield," the senators wrote, "sharing such 'internal records' when it favors the U.N., but then declining to do so when such disclosure could have negative implications." The blunt letter is signed by the subcommittee's chairman, Senator Norm Coleman, Republican of Minnesota, and Senator Carl Levin, Democrat of Michigan.
I believe this is the first time in Senate history Levin has done anything intelligent
Edward Mortimer, director of communications in the secretary general's office, said United Nations officials would "carefully look into what is clearly a very awkward and troubling letter."
Why is the letter awkward? If it was troubling you must have had not difficulty understanding it.
Posted by:Mrs. Davis

#13  the point is, Mikey, they're obscuring, obfuscating, denying, and shredding, their side, even as we blog. Kofi's son's new co. got the contract over a better bid by a diff. co, any comment, UN-boy?
Posted by: Frank G   2004-11-11 10:03:43 PM  

#12  
Re #5 (Raptor): don't you think it is most enlightining that Kofi is doing evrything he can to obstruct the investigations into U.N. shinanigans.If he has nothing to hide the why won't he turn over the documents,and allow interviews with those involved.

The posted article would have been a better article if it had reported the UN's side of this dispute.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-11-11 9:58:24 PM  

#11  Sorry!
Posted by: Raj   2004-11-11 8:04:45 PM  

#10  If that doesn't work, list U.N. H.Q. on eBay.

Sell it to Trump; they'll be financially bankrupt in a few years.
Posted by: Jerry Seinfeld   2004-11-11 8:04:09 PM  

#9  Not that we really needed it, but this is a PERFECT excuse/reason to CUT OFF UN FUNDING until they give us full access.

After all, it's OUR money. Though I'm sure Coffee wouldn't agree.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-11-11 12:24:32 PM  

#8  Jack, don't you have some dead presidents to count?
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-11 12:18:27 PM  

#7  I need more links. Links for everything! I need Christian Witless! Crazy neos are running the world while good Methodists are being massacreeD! It ain't right! All links to the peple! More Bibles to China! More grease for Kofi! Trick or Treat MotherFuckers!
Posted by: Jack Tatum   2004-11-11 12:16:35 PM  

#6  Mike, 9:00 p. m. EDT. Here. Links and all.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-11-11 12:08:08 PM  

#5  Mike,don't you think it is most enlightining that Kofi is doing evrything he can to obstruct the investigations into U.N. shinanigans.If he has nothing to hide the why won't he turn over the documents,and allow interviews with those involved.Seems to me that given your nieve loyalty to everthing U.N.you would be demanding full disclosure to at least clear Kofi and son's name.
Posted by: raptor   2004-11-11 10:32:48 AM  

#4  Trick or Treat for UNICEF is over isn't it?
Why do we have this Troll here then?
Posted by: Sock Puppet of Doom   2004-11-11 7:57:30 AM  

#3  
Here is my summary of the "evidence" that Kojo Annan had some relationship with UN decisions about the Food-for-Oil Program.

To everyone who is still upset that their bubble was popped ------ too bad!
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-11-11 7:44:54 AM  

#2  This one's a no-brainer. Turn over the documents, or we pass a bill revoking all U.S. funding of the U.N. until they're produced. (If that doesn't work, list U.N. H.Q. on eBay.)
Posted by: Thoan   2004-11-11 1:15:40 AM  

#1  
I wonder if they want to talk to Mike Sylvester about Kofi Jr.’s involvement.

I welcome any information from anybody showing that Kofi Jr. had anything at all to do with the UN -- any information at all about any involvement at all. I've been waiting for several weeks.
.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-11-11 12:26:48 AM  

00:00