You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
International-UN-NGOs
US may not push for ouster of IAEA chief ElBaradei
2004-10-24
Despite urging UN nuclear chief Mohamed ElBaradei to step down after two terms, the Bush administration may be unwilling to undertake an all-out political battle to oust him, US officials and diplomats say. ElBaradei, who has worked at the International Atomic Energy Agency for 20 years, officially announced his interest in a third term late last month, rebuffing President George W. Bush's team, which said it hoped he would step down and allow the appointment of a new leader. A senior US official said: "We'd rather see an elegant way out for everybody. What we're seeking is a resolution that doesn't force the issue."
"We'd rather see an elegant way out for everybody. What we're seeking is a resolution that doesn't force the issue."
"He's an idiot, but we'd rather he leave on his own."
Bush and Democratic candidate Sen. John Kerry have both declared that keeping nuclear weapons out of the hands of terrorists would be their first priority after the Nov. 2 election, and the IAEA is a key player in efforts to halt the spread of weapons of mass destruction. IAEA directors-general traditionally have not had term limits. But western countries have discussed the need for limits and the White House affirmed its preference for a two-term cap. Bush administration hardliners, led by Undersecretary of State John Bolton, fault ElBaradei and the IAEA for not being tough enough on states seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction, including Iran and North Korea. In the runup to the Iraq war, Elbaradei stoked US anger by saying IAEA inspectors had found no evidence of a continuing nuclear programme in Iraq.
Posted by:Fred

#7  Try him, then hang him.

Hmmm, wrong thread? try him anyway!
Posted by: Kalle (kafir forever)   2004-10-24 7:44:47 PM  

#6  Dump ElBaradei if we can, but the problem is more insideous than just him. The entire IAEA is the real problem and, while we are at it, the entire UN.
Posted by: Capt America   2004-10-24 12:40:28 PM  

#5  Khan would be a great choice. He already knows who's got all the goodies since he provided them.
Posted by: Crikey   2004-10-24 12:19:54 PM  

#4  It's not El Baradey, of Kofi, or Terja Laasen [sp?], who are at fault --- it is the assumption that all nations (actually goverments) are equal on which the UN based.
Posted by: Anonymous6092   2004-10-24 10:24:39 AM  

#3  .com it's Khan.
Posted by: Shipman   2004-10-24 10:20:03 AM  

#2  â€œWe’d rather see an elegant way out for everybody. What we’re seeking is a resolution that doesn’t force the issue.”

In other words;

"We who have access to well stocked fallout shelters could give a shit about whatever rads the peasants will absorb because of our failure to halt ineffectual morons like ElBaradei."

Keep your eyes on the prize.
Posted by: Zenster   2004-10-24 2:29:36 AM  

#1  Knowing the UN, the next in line to replace him, sans extraordinary US pressure, is prolly a NorK or Mad Mullah.
Posted by: .com   2004-10-24 1:04:01 AM  

00:00