You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Clinton eyes U.N. post
2004-10-21
WASHINGTON, Oct. 20 (UPI) -- Former U.S. President Bill Clinton has set his sights on becoming U.N. secretary-general. A Clinton insider and a senior U.N. source have told United Press International the 56-year-old former president would like to be named leader of the world body when Kofi Annan's term ends early in 2006. "He definitely wants to do it," the Clinton insider said this week.
"It'd be a great way for me to meet willing chicks make a contribution to world peace."
A Clinton candidacy is likely to receive overwhelming support from U.N. member states, particularly the Third World. Diplomats in Washington say Clinton would meet willing chicks galvanize the United Nations and give an enormous boost to its prestige. But the former president's hopes hang on a crucial question that will not be addressed until after the presidential elections: can he get the support of the U.S. government -- a prerequisite for nomination?

The political wisdom is that a second George W. Bush presidency would cut him off at the pass. The notion of Clinton looming large in the international arena from "the glass tower" in New York would be intolerable to the Bush White House. If Democratic candidate, Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., wins on Nov. 2 the prospect of Clinton as secretary-general won't exactly be welcome either, but Kerry would find it much harder -- if not impossible -- to go against it.
'cause he'd owe Bill, ya know.
After a Middle East U.N. Secretary General (Boutros Boutros Ghali) and an African (Kofi Annan) it is generally considered Asia's turn to fill the post, U.N. experts say. No announcement has been made, but behind the scenes China is already pushing the candidacy of Thai Foreign Minister Surakiart Sathirathai, who also seems to have U.S. support. If Clinton does emerge as a candidate, however, China would most likely shift its support, the experts say.
As a thank you for the satellite info.
No American has ever been U.N. secretary-general, but the United States is both host country to the United Nations and the major contributor to its budget. A hostile U.S. Congress held up its dues for years -- until the Clinton administration negotiated a payment plan for Washington's arrears. Clinton also revived U.S. membership of UNESCO though the Americans did not actually move back into their offices at the Paris-based scientific and cultural U.N. agency until after the start of the Bush presidency.

President Reagan had taken the United States out of UNESCO in protest against alleged corruption by former top agency officials.
And Ronnie was right again.
Clinton is currently recovering from the heart bypass surgery he had to undergo last month, and this has kept him away from the Kerry campaign after a few initial support appearances. The former president has told friends and Kerry staffers he plans to resume campaigning for Kerry, but on a limited scale because his recovery has been gradual. He has talked of his interest in taking over at the United Nations since the publication of his commercially successful autobiography, which he recently said had sold 1.9 million copies. Writing the book kept him busy after leaving office in 2000, but he is now ready to channel his considerable political skills and energy into another role in public life.

There had been rumors that he would run the Third Way organization, the world Social Democratic movement he had talked of launching together with British Prime Minister Tony Blair and German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder. But the political alliance had come unstuck and the idea ran out of steam partly because Blair and Schroeder found themselves on opposite sides in the Bush-led Iraq war.

Putting Clinton in charge of the United Nations would be a real test of international intentions, observers say. "Critics of the U.N. complain that it's an organization without the muscle and will to put its decisions into effect," the U.N. source observed. "There's a good chance that Clinton could let him meet willing chicks significantly change that situation, and then we'll see if the critics mean what they say."
Posted by:Steve White

#17  Cripes... now the bastard wants to be World President! (And don't think for one second that isn't his view of the SG's job, either)
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-10-21 6:50:56 PM  

#16  lex:
Maybe it would speed up the death of that irrelevant organization. Athough I can't stand the man (and have even less use for the UN) I can't totally rule out that this might be a good idea.
Posted by: Secret Master   2004-10-21 5:44:39 PM  

#15  I think Bill would be able to restore some American popularity around the world and he can't possibly be worse than Kofi and his corrupt son.

Thats ludacriss. Wherthit Thilvester?
Posted by: Ambassador Tyson   2004-10-21 5:13:00 PM  

#14  yadda yadda yadda... Clinton would have zero impact. How exactly would Clinton persuade the Arabs to cease supporting the slaughter of black Africans in Sudan? How would he prevent Libya from chairing the UN Human Rights Commission? How would he end the shameful and absurd anti-Israel hatefest that consumes almost half of the General Assembly's time?

Clinton as head of the UN would merely delay the eventual death of that irrelevant organization.
Posted by: lex   2004-10-21 5:07:05 PM  

#13  Having America's best interests at heart does not mean he has a spine or good taste. It means he wouldn't blame America for each and every problem as Kofi has done and his guilt over Rwanda would probably cause him to push to stop genocides in the future.

I think Bill would be able to restore some American popularity around the world and he can't possibly be worse than Kofi and his corrupt son.

I also think he'd be the best person to help move the UN to France so he could get away from Hillary.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2004-10-21 4:53:42 PM  

#12  WOW!! I'm all for this! Put Bill in charge of the UN and then pull the US out of the UN.

Have fun Bill!!
Posted by: mmurray821   2004-10-21 4:40:13 PM  

#11  .. I think he has America's best intersts at heart..

If he did, the Cole attack and the 2001 WTC attack might not have happened; we'd have gone after Binny and Soddy much, much sooner.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-10-21 4:12:30 PM  

#10  rj, what are you taking? I want some. We're talking the guy who appointed Mad Albright, Don Shalalah, and Jock Elders. And don't forget he married Hill.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-21 3:28:11 PM  

#9  If Dollar Bill was the SecGen of the UN, could Hillary be even remotely considered for Pres of US? Wouldn't that be the most massively obvious case of conflict of interest in world history? Lol! Wotta silly-assed joke. Pfeh.
Posted by: .com   2004-10-21 3:23:42 PM  

#8  If the world is willing to vote for Clinton the US should push for him as well. Hate him or love him I think he has America's best intersts at heart and would thus stand up to crap like that Durbin conference.
Posted by: rjschwarz   2004-10-21 2:59:00 PM  

#7  "Critics of the U.N. complain that it's an organization without the muscle and will to put its decisions into effect," the U.N. source observed. "There's a good chance that Clinton could significantly change that situation, and then we'll see if the critics mean what they say."

Nonsense. The UN's problem is structural: it defends the sovereignty of nightmare regimes in a an age in which those regimes threaten to destroy the rest of us. Until and unless this is changed, the UN will never prevent a war or enhance our security. It's the ultimate Clintonism: a feel-good rhetorical platform that allows inaction and corrupt behavior to continue apace.
Posted by: lex   2004-10-21 2:46:40 PM  

#6  Meanwhile, al-Reuters (via Drudge) reports on the Clinton Legacy: Syphilis Through Oral Sex on the Rise
Posted by: BH   2004-10-21 2:43:21 PM  

#5  Oughta be fun to see what he would do with the whole international sex trade issue. Child prostitution might an entertaining topic to watch Mr. Clinton take a swing at, as well.
Posted by: Jules 187   2004-10-21 2:39:21 PM  

#4  Mike,

That is exactly why it will never happen. By treaty or tradition, I cannot determine which, the Secretary General is not a citizen of any of the Permanent Security Council members. To think that the UN would break this tradition, at a minimum, is to misunderstand the rest of the world.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-10-21 2:38:18 PM  

#3  I don't think his heart's in it.
Posted by: BH   2004-10-21 2:37:40 PM  

#2  ..Ya know what? If this becomes a serious possibility, I will write President Bush and ENCOURAGE him to nominate Willie to the job. Better ANY American in that job than the Islamofascist who we are almost certainly going to be stuck with after Annan leaves.

Mike
Posted by: Mike Kozlowski   2004-10-21 2:31:50 PM  

#1  Moving to Paris, Bill? Take Hillary with you!

Seriously, the last thing we need is for the Democratic Party to line up behind the U.N. even more than Kerry has already. On the other hand, this could galvanize moderate Republicans against the U.N. and lead to a cut-back in U.S. contributions.

Would Clinton have diplomatic immunity against charges of molesting interns?
Posted by: Tom   2004-10-21 2:31:00 PM  

00:00