You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
CNSNews.com Publishes Iraqi Intelligence Docs
2004-10-12
Go ye there and check out the documents. In original Arabic with English translations.
When CNSNews.com published an article Monday, Oct. 4, entitled, "Exclusive: Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties," we decided against publishing all 42 pages of the Iraqi intelligence documents in our possession and on which the article was based. We published only the first page, fearing that if more were made widely available on the Internet, they might end up being altered or otherwise manipulated. We offered credentialed news organizations and counter-terrorism experts the opportunity to view and receive copies of the documents so that they might check for themselves on the authenticity of the documents and judge their importance in the debate over whether Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and/or had ties to international terrorist organizations.

Several news organizations did just that. But in light of other assertions on Wednesday, widely reported by the mainstream media, that Saddam did not pose any significant threat prior to the U.S. invasion of Iraq, we felt it was time to publish as many of the Iraqi intelligence documents as possible. What follows are copies of 24 of the 42 pages that are in our possession. Pages 21 through 26 were not published because they contain a list of terrorists trained at a camp belonging to the Iraqi Intelligence Directorate. CNSNews.com hopes to glean more information about the individuals on this list and provide updates in the future on their activities and whereabouts. Pages 29 through 40 were excluded because they replicate, though in a different person's handwriting, earlier documents. Upon clicking on the individual pages of Arabic documents, readers will have an opportunity to click on the unedited English translation of those documents. We hope this serves to further illuminate a very important element of the ongoing debate.
snip. Go to website to see links to individual pages.
Posted by:trailing wife

#4  Q: How many hardware engineers does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: "We'll fix the problem in software."

Q: How many software engineers does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: "We'll make a note in the documentation."

Q: How many documentation writers does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: "The user can work out any peculiarities by himself."

Q: How many Microsoft executives does it take to change a lightbulb?

A: "Darkness is the new standard!"
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-10-12 12:49:23 PM  

#3  Thanks, guys. I'm the proverbial end user, I'm afraid.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-10-12 12:30:43 PM  

#2  #1, that's the old link BTW, the new lik is:
http://www.cnsnews.com//ViewNation.asp?Page=%5CNation%5Carchive%5C200410%5CNAT20041011a.html

the slashes were stripped off the query in the original post
Posted by: Enigmatic   2004-10-12 11:19:16 AM  

#1  link doesn't work, correct link:

http://www.cnsnews.com/specialreports.asp

At least, until that moves
Posted by: Enigmatic   2004-10-12 11:08:17 AM  

00:00