You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
China-Japan-Koreas
Taipei 101 Skyscraper Deemed Tallest
2004-10-08
A global architectural group on Friday declared the Taipei 101 skyscraper in Taiwan's capital the world's tallest building.
(Taiwan suffers from killer earthquakes. I hope these guys know what their doing.)
The 1,679-foot-tall structure -- which some liken to a giant bamboo shoot of glass and steel -- received the title from the Council on Tall Buildings and Urban Habitat, a Chicago-based nonprofit organization involved in the planning, design and construction of skyscrapers. "There's no dispute whether Taipei 101 is the tallest building in the world," said Ron Klemencic, chairman of the council, as he formally certified the building's record with a new plaque. Before the title ceremony, Taiwanese President Chen Shui-bian told Klemencic that the record "not only gives affirmation to Taiwan's architectural industry, it's also the pride and honor of Taiwan's 23 million people." The 101-story skyscraper is 184 feet taller than the previous record-holder, the Petronas Towers in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia. Taipei 101 also claims a hat trick for having the highest structural top, tallest roof and the highest occupied floor. It also has two of the world's fastest elevators, which travel 3,333 feet per minute and can go from the ground floor to the 89th floor in 39 seconds.

To determine a building's height, the council measures from the sidewalk level of the main entrance to the skyscraper's architectural top, which can include a penthouse, tower, spire or pinnacle. Flagpoles, TV and radio antennas aren't included. Last October, Taiwan celebrated the skyscraper's record-breaking status when a pinnacle was installed on top of the building, making it the world's tallest structure. The building features office space, a shopping mall and an observatory.

Klemencic acknowledged that the future of tall buildings seemed uncertain after Sept. 11 terrorist attacks in the United States destroyed the World Trade Center towers in New York. "There was a strong emotional reaction from the public and even in the building industry," he said. But he added that people now understand that the real threat came from airplanes. The terrorists could have easily attacked other structures, such as sports stadiums, he said. Taipei 101 "is a much safer place to be than a house because of all the safety systems," he said. Klemencic said the building has a state-of-the-art sprinkler and smoke control system. It also features "areas of refuge" -- specially reinforced places with fire protection -- that people can go to without evacuating the building. "If there's a fire on the 75th floor, you only need to go down a few floors to a place built to be more fire safe and stronger," he said
Posted by:Mark Espinola

#4  On this story I beat Drudge to the punch.
Posted by: Mark Espinola   2004-10-08 5:38:21 PM  

#3  Since it is now higher than any Muslim tower should they be worried?
Posted by: 3dc   2004-10-08 10:16:16 AM  

#2  There is one thing about advancing structural design. There is another thing about megalomania. This is No. 2, IMHO.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-10-08 8:54:54 AM  

#1  Speaking of earthquakes, a mild one has already killed workmen at this building...read on.

'Despite several setbacks, the Taipei Financial Centre, otherwise known as Taipei 101, planned to ascend 101 stories to 1,667 feet, is due to be completed late in 2004 or early 2005.

A fire earlier this month in the 10-story shopping mall at the base of the building was but the latest incident in the tower's somewhat chequered career.

[[Five workers were killed when two construction cranes toppled over during a mild earthquake in April 2002.]]

Earlier doubts arose that the building might interfere with aircraft flight paths, before permission was granted to exceed past height limits.'
Posted by: Mark Espinola   2004-10-08 7:44:03 AM  

00:00