You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Documents Show Saddam Possessed WMD, Had Extensive Terror Ties
2004-10-04
EFL:Iraqi intelligence documents, confiscated by U.S. forces and obtained by CNSNews.com, show numerous efforts by Saddam Hussein's regime to work with some of the world's most notorious terror organizations, including al Qaeda, to target Americans. They demonstrate that Saddam's government possessed mustard gas and anthrax, both considered weapons of mass destruction, in the summer of 2000, during the period in which United Nations weapons inspectors were not present in Iraq. And the papers show that Iraq trained dozens of terrorists inside its borders.

One of the Iraqi memos contains an order from Saddam for his intelligence service to support terrorist attacks against Americans in Somalia. The memo was written nine months before U.S. Army Rangers were ambushed in Mogadishu by forces loyal to a warlord with alleged ties to al Qaeda. Other memos provide a list of terrorist groups with whom Iraq had relationships and considered available for terror operations against the United States. A senior government official who is not a political appointee provided CNSNews.com with copies of the 42 pages of Iraqi Intelligence Service documents. The originals, some of which were hand-written and others typed, are in Arabic. CNSNews.com had the papers translated into English by two individuals separately and independent of each other. There are no hand-writing samples to which the documents can be compared for forensic analysis and authentication. However, three other experts - a former weapons inspector with the United Nations Special Commission (UNSCOM), a retired CIA counter-terrorism official with vast experience dealing with Iraq, and a former advisor to then-presidential candidate Bill Clinton on Iraq - were asked to analyze the documents. All said they comport with the format, style and content of other Iraqi documents from that era known to be genuine.

Laurie Mylroie, who authored the book, "Study of Revenge: Saddam Hussein's Unfinished War against America," and advised Clinton on Iraq during the 1992 presidential campaign, told CNSNews.com that the papers represent "the most complete set of documents relating Iraq to terrorism, including Islamic terrorism" against the U.S. Mylroie has long maintained that Iraq was a state sponsor of terrorism against the United States. The documents obtained by CNSNews.com , she said, include "correspondence back and forth between Saddam's office and Iraqi Mukhabarat (intelligence agency). They make sense. This is what one would think Saddam was doing at the time."

Bruce Tefft, a retired CIA official who specialized in counter-terrorism and had extensive experience dealing with Iraq, said that "based on available, unclassified and open source information, the details in these documents are accurate ..." The former UNSCOM inspector zeroed in on the signatures on the documents and "the names of some of the people who sign off on these things. "This is fairly typical of that time era. [The Iraqis] were meticulous record keepers," added the former U.N. official, who spoke with CNSNews.com on the condition of anonymity. The senior government official, who furnished the documents to CNSNews.com, said the papers answer "whether or not Iraq was a state sponsor of Islamic terrorism against the United States. It also answers whether or not Iraq had an ongoing biological warfare project continuing through the period when the UNSCOM inspections ended."
Long detailed article follows, read it at the link.
The senior government official and source of the Iraqi intelligence memos, explained that the reason the documents have not been made public before now is that the government has "thousands and thousands of documents waiting to be translated. "It is unlikely they even know this exists," the source added. The government official also explained that the motivation for leaking the documents, "is strictly national security and helping with the war on terrorism by focusing this country's attention on facts and away from political posturing. "This is too important to let it get caught up in the political process," the source told CNSNews.com.
Gee, it is October, isn't it?
To protect against the Iraqi intelligence documents being altered or misrepresented elsewhere on the Internet, CNSNews.com has decided to publish only the first of the 42 pages in Arabic, along with the English translation. Portions of some of the other memos in translated form are also being published to accompany this report. Credentialed journalists and counter-terrorism experts seeking to view the 42 pages of Arabic documents or to challenge their authenticity may make arrangements to do so at CNSNews.com headquarters in Alexandria, Va.
Just one page at the moment, I'd expect more in the coming days.
Posted by:Steve

#11  I would assume this data came from Saddams gov't computer hard drives captured some months ago.Just imagine correlating and translating that data.I like the timing of the release.
Posted by: crazyhorse   2004-10-04 11:05:07 PM  

#10  CBS set the news standard as "Fake but Accurate". These memos are probably accurate but they will never pass the "fake" test.
Posted by: john   2004-10-04 9:04:50 PM  

#9  Let's just hope that these documents didn't come out of CBS's Baghdad Office and faxed from an Abilene Kinkos.

Posted by: danking70   2004-10-04 5:13:59 PM  

#8  Doesn't matter.

BushHitler. Halliburton. Lies. Moron. Crushing of dissent.™

Ignore facts and documentation. Stay on message. We must take power again! Lie, cheat, steal, cover up - the method isn't important. We deserve it because we are right-thinking! And nuanced.

/LLL
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-10-04 2:48:32 PM  

#7  Well, Rush just mentioned it.
Posted by: anonymous2u   2004-10-04 2:44:06 PM  

#6  Previous comments have stolen my thunder re sarcasm. But seriously, just how valid is this claim?
Posted by: Chicago Mike   2004-10-04 2:10:42 PM  

#5  Most likely the MSM will claim that the docs are forged in order to steal the election for Bush. I sure there are a lot of 'experts' paid for by the DNC to make that claim.
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-10-04 2:06:00 PM  

#4  Oh, my, I am sure this will be all over the headlines, and the network newscasts.
Surrrrre, it will.
Posted by: Sgt. Mom   2004-10-04 1:41:49 PM  

#3  If they don't have Saddam shaking hands with OBL while showing off an Iraqi manufactured nuke on video, this story will die.
Posted by: JerseyMike   2004-10-04 1:34:52 PM  

#2  If we hear anything at all on this from the MSM, it'll be to discredit the authenticity of the docs.
Posted by: Xbalanke   2004-10-04 1:33:40 PM  

#1  Maybe I'm just cynical, demoralized and pessimistic, but I'm really not expecting much on this or the Oil-for-palaces program stories.

The press isn't just opposed, I think they're on the OTHER SIDE. :(
Posted by: Anonymous4021   2004-10-04 1:03:47 PM  

00:00