You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
USGS: Mount St. Helens could erupt within 24 hours
2004-10-03
Observatory 3 miles from volcano's base evacuated
Scientists warn that Mount St. Helens could erupt within 24 hours, and with more force than previously expected. Saturday afternoon, the U.S. Geological Survey issued a Level 3 Volcano Alert, indicating an eruption could occur within the next day, said Tom Pierson with the USGS. That level alert is the third of four -- with the fourth being eruption. The alert was issued after scientists detected the movement of magma, or underground lava, the USGS said.
Posted by:Mark Espinola

#5  

Tive vs depth chart of eartquakes. Note on righrt-hand side...pushing to the surface...



Also most recent strong earthquake is west of Fridays blowing off of steam...



USGS Volcano Cam shows haziness in the crater spreading east - wind blowing ash-dust from Friday's event...
Posted by: BigEd   2004-10-03 1:24:50 PM  

#4  I'd been wanting to see Mt. St. Helens ever since the 1980 eruption, and I finally got my chance two years ago on a vacation to the west coast.

All I can say is, that sucker is IMMENSE. And so was the devastation from the '80 eruption: miles and miles of blasted forest. It was pretty sobering.

What I found most interesting was how fast the area is recovering: what once was grey, ash-covered moonscape right after the eruption is now covered by trees and brush, some of it 20-30 feet high. Down along the river, the growth is so thick in places you can't see the mountain. At one point, I went on a sort of "nature trail" that described the expected recovery from the eruption, detailing what sort of vegetation could be expected "X" number of years after the blast; and I noticed that what I was seeing **WAY** exceeded what they predicted even a half-century from now.

All in all, it was pretty amazing.

As for the current activity, I doubt it'll amount to more than a small fart, compared to the 1980 blast.
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-10-03 10:10:17 AM  

#3  Time to donate a small portion of Washington state to Russia, methinks. There goes Kyoto...
Posted by: Bulldog   2004-10-03 9:10:48 AM  

#2  I don't know, but I saw a geologist being interviewed a few hours ago on CNN and he looked really happy about the coming show.
Posted by: Bryan   2004-10-03 8:59:07 AM  

#1  How big are they predicting?
Posted by: Charles   2004-10-03 8:54:56 AM  

00:00