| Submit your comments on this article |
| International-UN-NGOs |
| Bolton questions IAEA's efficiency |
| 2004-10-02 |
| EFL - did he mean efficacy? "There is, I think it's fair to say, an enormous frustration on many occasions within the American body politic about the ineffectiveness and inefficiency of U.N. agencies," said John R. Bolton, the undersecretary of state for arms control and international security, during a conference at the American Enterprise Institute on Tuesday. "At the same time, there is concern that these agencies not exceed their mandates, that they have responsibilities and duties that their underlying charters or statutes or enabling treaties give them. And we want them to be confined to that." Charging that the IAEA has been unable to rein in either the Iranian or North Korean nuclear programs, Mr. Bolton said the agency is spending the bulk of its expertise and resources on peaceful nations, when rogue nuclear programs and terrorism are the real concerns. "Sixty percent of the IAEA safeguards budget is spent monitoring compliance with the safeguards agreement of Canada, Japan, and Germany," he said. He said it was incomprehensible that the IAEA had not taken more action on Iran. "Despite the fact that we have now had the Iranian nuclear program, under consideration in the board of governors for six meetings, extending over a period of 18 months, the board has not yet come to the conclusion that Iran should be referred to the [U.N.] Security Council," he said. |
| Posted by:Super Hose |
| #2 They are quite efficient at ensuring Iran gets atomic weapons. |
| Posted by: ed 2004-10-02 12:30:46 AM |
| #1 "Sixty percent of the IAEA safeguards budget is spent monitoring compliance with the safeguards agreement of Canada, Japan, and Germany," he said. And it worked because, hey, they don't have nukes, right? So what's he bitching about? Besides, have you ever seen a 5 star North Korean restaurant? I mean, are they expected to dine like animals? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2004-10-02 12:18:59 AM |