You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
-Short Attention Span Theater-
Global Warming Benefit Alert: Belgium Will Slip Into the Sea
2004-09-08
Global warming alert

8 September 2004

BRUSSELS - By the year 3000, Brussels will be a coastal capital and Antwerp will have disappeared into the sea, warned a report out on Wednesday.

The study into the effects Belgium could suffer from global warming was carried out by the Catholic University of Leuven (UCL) and was commissioned by the environmental group Greenpeace.

A team of 20 experts, headed by climatology professor Jean-Pascal van Ypersele, warned Belgium would not escape the green house effect.

The researchers predicted that the country will see milder winters in the years to come, but that summers would become more humid, with many more heatwaves like 2003.

By the end of century, temperatures may rise between 1.7 and 4.9 degrees in winter and 2.4 to 6.6 degrees in the summer - the kind of temperature increases that haven't been recorded for the last 10,000 years.

Increased flooding, storms and coastal erosion were also predicted. The experts said an increase of one metre in the sea-level around Belgium would see 63,000 hectares of land disappear.

That problem could be tackled in the short-term, stated the report, through schemes to add extra sand to beaches.

One such project is currently under way in Ostend, for example.

The experts also said new species were proliferating in Belgium and would continue to do so, such as the arrival of oysters in the North Sea, which until now have preferred warmer waters.

Van Ypersele said some of the effects of climate change would be welcomed but added: "Looking at a horizon of 2030, 2050 or beyond, we can see that the potential negative effects significantly outweigh the few positive effects."

Greenpeace said it hoped the government would look at the report's findings and realise the importance of using more renewable energy sources and of developing a long-term environmental strategy.


Posted by:Atomic Conspiracy

#7  Trailing Wife, planting trees will take to long. I recommend a moratorium on mowing grass.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-09-09 4:09:12 AM  

#6  Mmmmmm suikerwafels...

So plant more trees to soak up the CO2: evergreens on the north side - to block the wind - deciduous species on the south - to let the sun warm them in winter (and mangroves along the coast, perhaps?). Once upon a time all of northern Europe was forest and swamp, and we didn't hear whining about global warming then, did we!

Oh, yes, and turn down the sun -- it hasn't been this excited in 1000 years.
Posted by: trailing wife   2004-09-09 4:05:34 AM  

#5  Ooooh yummy! Fresh oysters in "New Venice" (formerly Brussels) in the year 3000! I can hardly wait. More Greenpeace money well spent.

What a waste of "experts." As they say over at Fark: "...and still no cure for cancer."

Posted by: Tom   2004-09-08 9:04:16 PM  

#4  Good. When does Paris go under.
Posted by: Mrs. Davis   2004-09-08 7:54:09 PM  

#3  The obvious solution is to slowly and methodically build a permanent sea wall, like in the Netherlands. Optimally, there are several advantages to doing this. The first is to design a wall that can be improved over time--larger and taller. Then you build secondary sea walls to actually reclaim land from the sea--also acting as "area surge barriers", for agriculture or other low human density projects. Between the two, even a tidal wave would be hard pressed to flood the main country.
Posted by: Anonymoose   2004-09-08 7:32:02 PM  

#2  Glug glug glug. Sharkbait!
Posted by: BigEd   2004-09-08 7:29:24 PM  

#1  No more waffles? Where will Kerry eat?
Posted by: Cyber Sarge   2004-09-08 7:23:31 PM  

00:00