You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Down Under
Australia woos US on war on terror
2004-07-14
Australia's Labour Party opposition has pledged greater engagement with Southeast Asia in the war on terror in a new defence strategy aimed at mending relations with the United States. It has also made Kim Beazley its defence spokesman in a move calculated to repair the party's relationship with Washington, which has been damaged by Labour's pledge to withdraw troops from Iraq if it wins elections this year. Nicknamed "Bomber" Beazley for his days as a strident defence minister from 1984 to 1990, he is a personal friend of US Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage.

Neil James, executive director of the Australian Defence Association, a think tank, predicted Beazley would bring a more thorough defence policy. "It (Beazley) will be very comforting news for the Americans and for many Australians," James told Australian Broadcasting Corp. radio Tuesday. Labour Party Leader Mark Latham detailed Monday a national security policy that would look beyond the 53-year-old United States-Australia defence alliance in the war on terror. Ahead of the polls, Labour is keen to undermine Prime Minister John Howard's advantage of close relations with the United States and a national security track record forged in his response to the Sept. 11, 2001, al-Qaida attacks on Washington and New York. "Australia must engage more effectively with Asia," Latham said in a speech to the Institute of International Affairs in Sydney. "In the past, Labour governments were able to shape the pattern of regional arrangements ... the Howard government has moved in a different direction."
So the Aussie Left understands that it can't go it alone. Interesting revelation.
Latham said that while he maintained his pledge to withdraw troops from the Middle East, he would not recall all 850 Australian military personnel based in and around Iraq. Latham said Labour would support Iraq by sending customs, health and protective staff to help with post-war reconstruction. He also said a Labour government would offer 20 to 30 non-combat personnel to support the protection of the United Nations mission in Iraq. Latham said Labour supported the continued deployment of Australian navy ships to protect Iraq's oil platforms in the Persian Gulf, and the deployment of Australia's Orion aircraft. He said those deployments predated the war on Iraq and were an important contribution in the war on terrorism. But Howard accused Latham Tuesday of backpedalling on Iraq. "Mr. Latham has to admit that his original commitment to bring the troops home by Christmas was a terrible mistake," he told Sydney radio station 2GB.
Posted by:Steve White

#10  I doubt Beazley could lead Ausralia's armed forces into the front bar on a Friday night. He was held in very low esteem- once he got stuck in the hatch of a tank and had to be lifted out with a crane.
And the late and unlamented Keating Labor government did the "engagement with Asia" bit. This consisted of Keating sucking up to the mega thief Soeharto in the most sickening style. Lots of father-son shit. God it was embarrassing.
And as for the headline- dont you ever confuse Australia with the Australian Labor Party. The two have nothing in common.
Posted by: Grunter   2004-07-14 9:10:55 PM  

#9  "... offer 20 to 30 non-combat personnel to support the protection of the United Nations mission in Iraq."

Ummm. Pardon me while I giggle for a while. Non-combat personnel? Great idea. I'm sure they'll be a lot of protection.
Posted by: Kathy K   2004-07-14 8:12:04 PM  

#8  Australia-it's appreciated by us that you're providing a model for the world of what a positive American/allied relationship looks like.

Australia-thank you for your sacrifices and integrity in this war.
Posted by: jules 187   2004-07-14 12:36:02 PM  

#7  I would like to see Australia take the lead in helping the Phillipines with their little Islamic insurgency problem. I'd also like to see them help Thailand with their growing issues.

I'd love to see them help Indonesia but realistically I don't see the Indonesians welcoming help. They'd rather fall apart on their own.
Posted by: yank   2004-07-14 11:52:38 AM  

#6  The basic point is that there is no "engaging more effectively with Asia" - most of the Asian countries have interests and agendas of their own that run counter to Australian interests. In the long run, giving in to Asian demands over the alliance is a dangerous thing to do - the US is the only power squarely in Australia's corner, even if Australia's leftists pretend that its disputes with Asian powers are merely the result of misunderstandings.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-07-14 9:57:26 AM  

#5  Article: "Australia must engage more effectively with Asia," Latham said in a speech to the Institute of International Affairs in Sydney. "In the past, Labour governments were able to shape the pattern of regional arrangements ... the Howard government has moved in a different direction."

"Engaging more effectively with Asia" means that Australia should cave in to demands from Indonesia, Malaysia and China that it should dissociate itself from its alliance with the United States. Latham makes Kerry look like a straight-talker.
Posted by: Zhang Fei   2004-07-14 9:51:53 AM  

#4  I think Latham's actually some sort of Auzzie running joke. Wonder when they'll pull the plug.
Posted by: Bulldog   2004-07-14 8:46:37 AM  

#3  Phpbt. Latham makes Kerry look serious when it comes to the WoT. Labour, call back when you sack Latham. I don't care how you shuffle the palace guards.
Posted by: Mitch H.   2004-07-14 8:37:45 AM  

#2  Just hope the grown ups can still lead. But it's a drag that the grown ups of this world, Anglosphere, have to show the way. As little children and pot smokin Euros whine with their cheese.
Posted by: Lucky   2004-07-14 1:46:13 AM  

#1  Anglosphere == serious.

Hispanosphere == chickens.

Looks simple to me.
Posted by: someone   2004-07-14 12:58:51 AM  

00:00