You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Madrid blast probe conflict
2004-07-07
Spanish police probes into the Madrid bomb massacre in March conflicted with initial government claims that the explosive was of a kind used by the Basque separatist group ETA, a public enquiry heard on Wednesday.

A parliamentary committee of enquiry wanted to know why the government of former prime minister Jose Maria Aznar had drawn such quick conclusions about the substance, although police had no immediate evidence and laboratory tests later refuted the claim.

The then interior minister Angel Acebes made the claim to journalists within hours of the blasts killing 191, thereby casting suspicion on ETA.

Bomb disposal chief Juan Jesus Sanchez Manzano told the enquiry no one in his squad had identified the substance titadyne, the dynamite brand used by ETA since 2000.

He said police had established by 14:00 on March 11 that dynamite had indeed been used. But it had not been until after 02:00 the following morning that it was identified as another type, Goma-2 Eco.

But a document had already emerged from the interior ministry at midday on March 11 claiming "elements indicating that the explosive used was that normally used by ETA."

The then interior minister Angel Acebes told a press conference at 13:30 the same day that the explosive was the same as that normally used by ETA, thereby casting suspicion on the Basque separatist group that has been conducting a violent campaign for independence for the Basque country in northern Spain.

The public enquiry was set to examine specifically the order and detail of events between the moment the commuter bombs went off and a general election - won by Spain’s Socialists - on March 14, three days later.

Part of the enquiry’s brief is to examine whether Aznar’s conservative government had been justified in its assertion in the period leading up to the vote that the main line of inquiry focused on ETA.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#2  I picked up on the Titadyne/Goma2 thing JFM, but never realized the significance. Thanks for the info!
Posted by: 11A5S   2004-07-07 5:49:13 PM  

#1  In fact the governmennt was told it was Titadyne a kind of explosive commonly used by ETA who stolme eight tons of it. In fact it was goma2 who is no longer used by ETA (they have enough Titadyne for years) But some spanish papers tell it was impossible for explosive experts to mixup the two explosives who (textually) "smell as different as an apple and a banana". And still the governement received the false clue who pointed at ETA. Also between the bombings and the election radios belonging to socialists received info pointing to islamist footprints before the governement so the governemnt looked like it was lying.
Posted by: JFM   2004-07-07 5:31:39 PM  

00:00