| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| Diplomats: Iran Wanted Parts for Covert Nuke Program |
| 2004-06-10 |
Thursday, June 10, 2004 VIENNA, Austria  — Iran told a black market supplier it was interested in "tens of thousands" of parts for its covert nuclear program, diplomats said Thursday, as the U.N. atomic watchdog prepared to rebuke Tehran for hindering an agency probe of its activities. The diplomats, who spoke to The Associated Press on condition of anonymity, said the revelation about Iran’s offer was made at a closed-door meeting of the International Atomic Energy Agency. An IAEA report leaked last week mentioned that Iran had acknowledged inquiring about 4,000 magnets needed for uranium enrichment equipment with a European black-market supplier and had dangled the possibility of buying a "higher number" of such markets. At Thursday’s preparatory meeting for Monday’s IAEA board of governors’ conference an IAEA official was more precise, saying that Iran had said it was interested in "tens of thousands" of such magnets in future contracts, said diplomats present at the closed meeting. With two magnets per uranium enrichment centrifuge, tens of thousands of such parts would translated into a centrifuge program that significantly exceeds what Iran insists was only an experimental project. Uranium enrichment can be used to generate power or make nuclear weapons, depending on the level of enrichment. Iran insists it was interested only in energy generation and that its offer was purposely exaggerated to spark interest from the potential black market supplier. The United States and other nations say such arguments are an attempt to cover up nearly two decades of covert activities aimed at making nuclear weapons and point to what they say is continued Iranian secrecy on the scope of its enrichment program and other activities. The other main area of concern remains the source of traces of weapons-grade uranium on Iranian centrifuges. Tehran asserts the traces were inadvertently imported on purchases through the nuclear black market and that it has not enriched uranium beyond the low levels used for power generation. Aren’t self-admitted "purchases through the black market" a solid indicator of duplicity? Why are the buildings housing these tools still standing? But IAEA investigators have not been able to test that claim because Pakistan — the main source of the equipment — has blocked free access to its nuclear material, meaning the agency cannot match isotope samples to the traces found in Iran. Pakistan needs to be threatened with complete withdrawal of all international aid if they do not surrender samples immediately. This is crucial to "fingerprinting" breeder reactor production of fissile material. A polite reminder that should Pakistani nuclear material show up in trace analysis of any atomic terror attack isotopes that they would summarily be glassed and Windexed might hasten their cooperation. At the closed meeting Thursday, IAEA officials complained that the agency has in some cases waited in vain for information on enrichment since October. Oh, boo hoo. Cry me a f&%king river. What more indicators of bad intention do you morons need? Coming out of the meeting, Iran’s chief delegate to the IAEA, Amir Zamaninia said his country had attempted to clarify "a number of misunderstandings on the part of ... mainly the United States." But another delegate present said members of the Iranian and U.S. delegations had clashed on a number of issue at what was supposed to be a technical meeting, likening their deep differences on the nature of Iran’s nuclear program to a chasm between "two worlds." The testiness reflected tensions ahead of Monday’s board meeting, which is expected to censure Iran for continued foot-dragging a year into the IAEA probe of its nuclear ambitions. "CENSURE?" What about threat of prompt and direct military intervention, you flaming pansies? A draft resolution written by France, Germany and Britain is heavily peppered with negative terms, "deploring" omissions and delays by Iran in cooperating with the agency probe or noting them with "serious concern." Diplomats — all speaking on condition of anonymity — said the United States, Iran’s harshest critic, was generally satisfied with the tone of the draft. But they said Washington would push for some kind of deadline for Tehran to come up with the missing information needed to prove or disprove the Islamic Republic’s weapons ambitions. The board meeting will review the report on Iran by agency Director General Mohamed ElBaradei, as part of the IAEA probe. Why is America the only one insisting upon something sane, like a "deadline?" The report addresses the same concerns voiced in the draft and brought up at Thursday’s meeting — that Iran had tried to buy critical parts for advanced P-2 centrifuges and that ambiguity remains on the source of traces of weapons grade uranium found inside Iran. In the face of mounting international pressure, Iran suspended uranium enrichment last year, and in April it said it had stopped building centrifuges. Iran long has rejected U.S. allegations its nuclear program is for military purposes. ElBaradei said last month his agency had not found proof to date of a concrete link between Iran’s nuclear activities and its military program, but "it was premature to make a judgment." EMPHASIS ADDED "Premature to make a judgment?" And a big WTF? ElBaradei has pretty well shown himself to be an Iranian collaborator and not much else. |
| Posted by:Zenster |
| #2 The Iranians are feeling pretty frisky now, with all the trouble they have been fomenting in Iraq and now starting their sword-rattling rehearsal for when they get nukes. They have the opposition down for now. Iran will be the next big problem we face. Being defensive will not make the Black Turbans go away. They gave the finger to the IAEA and the G8. This problem better be dealt with soon. Election year or no. |
| Posted by: Alaska Paul 2004-06-10 10:00:28 PM |
| #1 And as if that wasn't enough: Iran Warns G8 It Will Not Halt Nuclear Program Thu Jun 10, 7:39 AM ET TEHRAN (Reuters) - Iran warned the Group of Eight on Thursday it had no intention of halting its nuclear program despite criticism by G8 leaders of Tehran's cooperation with the United Nations's nuclear watchdog. If the UN had even 1% of the sensitivity to "humiliation" that our fine fellows in the Middle East display, they would have already authorized military intervention. What more do these IAEA f&%kwits need? A two-week-in-advance black border invitation? |
| Posted by: Zenster 2004-06-10 6:44:56 PM |