You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Culture Wars
Author booed for anti-Bush remarks
2004-05-26
E.L. Doctorow, one of the most celebrated writers in America, was nearly booed off the stage at Hofstra University Sunday when he gave a commencement address lambasting President George W. Bush and effectively calling him a liar. Booing that came mainly from the crowd in the stands became so intense that Doctorow stopped speaking at one point, showing no emotion as he stood silently and listened to the jeers. Hofstra President Stuart Rabinowitz intervened, and called on the audience to allow him to finish. He did, although some booing persisted. Doctorow, who spent virtually all of his 20-minute address in Hempstead criticizing Bush, told the crowd that like himself the president is a storyteller. But "sadly they are not good stories this president tells," he said. "They are not good stories because they are not true." That line provoked the first boos, along with scattered cheers. "One story he told was that the country of Iraq had nuclear and biological and chemical weapons of mass destruction and was intending shortly to use them on us," he said. "That was an exciting story all right, it was designed to send shivers up our spines. But it was not true.
Doctorow appears to be having a bit of a problem with TRVTH™ himself, since Bush never said Sammy was intending shortly to use them on us. And they do seem to have existed, don't they? Of course, it was just a little bit of Sarin gas, just one itty-bitty round, and it was probably made a long time ago, in a galaxy far away...
"Another story was that the Iraqi dictator, Saddam Hussein, was in league with the terrorists of al-Qaida," he said. "And that turned out to be not true. But anyway we went off to war on the basis of these stories."
Except that Sammy did seem to have a fond relationship with Zarqawi, who's kind of the terrorist's terrorist, and who's intimately involved with al-Qaeda. And then there was Abu Nidal, and Abu Abbas — old-line terrorists, you betcha, even though not al-Qaeda terrorists.
Those lines provoked an outburst of boos so loud the "Ragtime" author stopped the speech. Rabinowitz approached the podium and called for calm. "We value open discussion and debate," he said. "For the sake of your graduates, please let him finish."
Oh? There was somebody there to debate him? I thought he was giving the commencement sermon?
Some students and most of the faculty responded with a standing ovation, and Doctorow resumed speaking. He attacked Bush for giving the rich tax breaks, doing "a very poor job of combating terrorism" and allowing the government to subpoena libraries "to see what books you’ve been taking out."
Yeah, yeah. The usual litany, isn't it? To me, it makes sense to give tax breaks to people who pay taxes. "Combating terrorism" is a fairly complicated job, since the enemy is vicious and tenacious and has lots of funding. I know nothing about the libraries thing, so maybe E.L. has a point, though I tend to doubt it...
Many parents and relatives of the more than 1,300 undergraduates were livid over the address, saying afterward that a college graduation was not the place for a political speech.
What an original idea...
"If this would have happened in Florida, we would have taken him out" of the stadium, said Frank Mallafre, who traveled from Miami for his granddaughter’s graduation. Bill Schmidt, 51, of North Bellmore, shared the outrage. "To ruin my daughter’s graduation with politics is pathetic," the retired New York Police Department captain said. "I think the president is doing the best he can" in the war against terrorism. Many students also called Doctorow’s speech inappropriate. Peter Hulse, 24, of Manchester, England, said, "He’s a bit like Michael Moore," the documentary director who provoked booing at last year’s Oscars’ ceremony by criticizing the war in Iraq. But some defended Doctorow’s speech.
That's normal. People usually fall on a bell curve. "Some" molest little children, too. It's usually not the high end of the curve who do...
"I think he’s entitled to his opinion and he’s as American as anyone else," said a Hempstead resident who identified himself only as Frank and whose daughter was graduating.
Lotsa people have opinions on lotsa different subjects. Politix, sex, religion, horse racing, whether to drive a Ford or a Chevy, whether it's going to rain tomorrow... They don't take any invitation as an invitation to share them. Mostly those with good manners stick to subjects in which they have some competence and in which their audience is interested.
One Hofstra official said Sunday that while Doctorow had the right to say what he did, he violated the unwritten code that college commencement speeches should inspire and unite a student body. Provost Dr. Herman Berliner said he has been to numerous graduation ceremonies during the past 30 years and "I cannot remember a commencement speech that was as divisive as this commencement speech was." The university did not know the content of the address. It is not Hofstra’s policy to screen commencement speeches, officials said. Berliner said it was relatively common during the Vietnam War, but "extraordinarily uncommon" in recent times for a speaker to have to stop speaking. Still, it has happened recently. Last year, New York Times reporter Chris Hedges was booed off the stage when he tried to deliver an antiwar speech at Rockford College in Illinois. Some Hofstra professors said Doctorow was on target in discussing the war. "I thought this was a totally appropriate place to talk about politics because that’s the world our students are entering," said sociology professor Cynthia Bogard. "I only wish their parents had provided them a better role model."
Actually, I'd guess most of them are entering the world of business, not the world of politix. I have strong opinions, but with the exception of one or two people of like opinion, occasionally, I never discuss them at work.
Posted by:tipper

#13  The important point: graduating seniors don't give a damn about Mr. Doctorow's political viewpoint. It's a graduation, dummy. Talk about graduation and the future and stuff like that.

Keep the rants for your fellow moonbats.
Posted by: mojo   2004-05-26 2:51:54 PM  

#12  "I thought this was a totally appropriate place to talk about politics because that’s the world our students are entering," said sociology professor Cynthia Bogard.

He wasn't talking politics, he was spewing his own personal opinion.

People actually pay this alledged woman to teach their children?
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-05-26 12:35:29 PM  

#11  I forgot to add that I'm not surprised--Doctorow's "Ragtime" was quite anti-American/ pro-socialism/communism.
Posted by: ex-lib   2004-05-26 12:08:41 PM  

#10  A similar thing happened here in Illinois last year at Rockford College-one person threw their cap to the stage, people in the audience turned their backs and hissed. The speaker, a New York journalist with a book out, promoted his theory that American support for the Iraqi war is symptomatic of the dangerous kind of comraderie that develops in the support for wars generally- an expression of nationalistic frenzy. Didn't fly to well out here in the Midwest...
Posted by: jules 187   2004-05-26 11:59:56 AM  

#9  But some defended Doctorow’s Pro-Kerry Democratic nonsense masquerading as a commencement speech. "I think he’s entitled to his lies opinion and he’s as much of a traitor American (oops) American as anyone else among the liberal non-thinking left ."
Posted by: ex-lib   2004-05-26 11:34:01 AM  

#8  #4 Mike S. - Well put.
Posted by: eLarson   2004-05-26 11:20:27 AM  

#7  #4 Mike S. - Well put.
Posted by: Anonymous5007   2004-05-26 11:20:08 AM  

#6  Professor Bogard? : Been measured for your burka yet?
Posted by: BigEd   2004-05-26 11:12:41 AM  

#5  sociology professor Cynthia Bogard. "I only wish their parents had provided them a better role model."

Translation: These parents aren't/weren't intelligent, nuanced or sophisticated enough to see how evil Mr. Bush really is.
Posted by: Anonymous4021   2004-05-26 11:09:55 AM  

#4  The audience came for another purpose and was captive until the end of the event. He exploited the situation in order to pronounce his own controversial political opinions. He deserved to be booed.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-05-26 11:00:29 AM  

#3  i think there should be a middle eastern tv show called infidel pool boy!
Posted by: REZANATOR   2004-05-26 10:49:02 AM  

#2  rerun - was under Peggy Noonans' take on the booing yesterday
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-26 10:05:05 AM  

#1  I don't think that all of the folks in attendance will be voting Bush this November. Hell some of them won't vote at all.

They just didn't want politics mixed with their scene.

Al Gore was roundly booed in Houston back in 2000. Still and all, a good many of the booers voted for him.

It's just the way us normal folk say "I really don't want to hear about it HERE."
Posted by: eLarson   2004-05-26 9:58:29 AM  

00:00