You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
US Army Investigating Various Cases of Possible Prisoner Abuse
2004-05-26
From the New York Times
An Army summary of deaths and mistreatment involving prisoners in American custody in Iraq and Afghanistan shows a widespread pattern of abuse involving more military units than previously known. .... Among previously unknown incidents are the abuse of detainees by Army interrogators from a National Guard unit attached to the Third Infantry Division, who are described in a document obtained by The New York Times as having "forced into asphyxiation numerous detainees in an attempt to obtain information" during a 10-week period last spring. The document, dated May 5, is a synopsis prepared by the Criminal Investigation Command at the request of Army officials ....

In one of the oldest cases, involving the death of a prisoner in Afghanistan in December 2002, enlisted personnel from an active-duty military intelligence unit at Fort Bragg, N.C., and an Army Reserve military-police unit from Ohio are believed to have been "involved at various times in assaulting and mistreating the detainee." ....

According to the Army summary, the deaths that are now being investigated most vigorously by Army officials may be those from Afghanistan in December 2002, where two prisoners died in one week at what was known as the Bagram Collection Point, where interrogations were overseen by a platoon from Company A, 519th Military Intelligence Battalion, from Fort Bragg. .... Lt. Col. Billy Buckner, a spokesman for the 18th Airborne Corps, said in an e-mail message on Monday that no one from the 519th Military Intelligence Battalion had yet been disciplined in connection with any deaths or other misconduct in Iraq. He declined to say if anyone from the unit was the subject of an ongoing investigation.

The document also categorizes as a sexual assault a case of abuse at Abu Ghraib last fall that involved three soldiers from that unit, who were later fined and demoted but whose names the Army has refused to provide. As part of the incident, the document says, the three soldiers "entered the female wing of the prison and took a female detainee to a vacant cell."

"While one allegedly stood as look-out and one held the detainee’s hand, the third soldier allegedly kissed the detainee," the report said. It says that the female detainee was reportedly threatened with being left with a naked male detainee, but that "investigation failed to either prove or disprove the indecent-assault allegations." The May 5 document said the three soldiers from the 519th were demoted: two to privates first class and one to specialist. One was fined $750, the other two $500 each.

In what appeared to be a serious case of abuse over a prolonged period of time, unidentified enlisted members of the 223rd Military Intelligence Battalion, part of the California National Guard, were accused of abusing Iraqi detainees at a center in Samarra, north of Baghdad. The unit, based in San Francisco, operated under the command of the Third Infantry Division .... members of the 223rd "struck and pulled the hair of detainees" during interrogations over a period that lasted 10 weeks. The summary said they "forced into asphyxiations numerous detainees in an attempt to obtain information." The accusations were based on the statement of a soldier. No other details of the abuse — not the number of suspected soldiers nor the progress of the investigation — were disclosed. ....

Another incident, whose general outlines had been previously known, involved the death in custody of a senior Iraqi officer, Maj. Gen. Abed Hamed Mowhoush, who died last November at a detention center run by the Third Armored Cavalry, of Fort Carson, Colo. Soldiers acknowledged to investigators that interviews with the general on Nov. 24 and 25 involved "physical assaults." In fact, investigators determined that General Mowhoush died after being shoved head-first into a sleeping bag, and questioned while being rolled repeatedly from his back to his stomach. ....

At a Pentagon briefing on Friday, a senior military official and a senior Pentagon medical official said the Army was investigating the deaths of 37 detainees in Iraq and Afghanistan, an increase from at least 25 deaths that a senior Army general described on May 4. ....
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#6  The media thought the abuse scandal was the ticket to discredit the war/beat bush once the photos came out. But, predictably, they couldn't help themselves and overplayed their hand. Middle America has concluded that some juvenile retards at Abu Ghraib went to far, are being punished, and Bush has done the right thing with a bad situation. The more the press pounds the prison abuse drum, the less effect it has at this point.
Posted by: Sludj   2004-05-26 5:46:01 PM  

#5  An Army summary of deaths and mistreatment involving prisoners in American custody in Iraq..

Yawn. Can you say, "beating a dead horse"?
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-05-26 5:39:09 PM  

#4  Lt. Col. Billy Buckner,

That name brings up some serious pain here in the heart of Red Sox Nation...
Posted by: Raj   2004-05-26 12:39:14 PM  

#3  I'd JDAM-retrofit their dead mook bodies and return them via F-18's. Wouldn't that put a twist in the Mahdi Army's morale?
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-26 12:31:13 PM  

#2  Hmmm - 12 more. I am uninterested in numbers of dead retrobates in Abu Gharib. I want to know what the added 12 did to end up there. Insurgents who fire on our guys are worth much more dead. At least mulch helps flowers bloom better. Otherwise its just another mouth to feed, and I hope it's fed pork. But even that costs taxpayer dollars.
Posted by: BigEd   2004-05-26 12:04:54 PM  

#1  And still no numbers on how many prisoners have been held. Without the scale, the number of "37" is meaningless, simply a piece of propaganda intended to make us more angry at our troops than at our enemy.

Mike seems to be buying into it.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-05-26 7:26:04 AM  

00:00