You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
U.S. stands by its attack on Iraqi wedding party
2004-05-21
The U.S. military says the attack that Iraqis say killed more than 40 members of a wedding party was no mistake. A spokesman says the air and ground assault near the Syrian border was aimed at a sanctuary for suspected foreign fighters....Local Iraqis say a large number of women and children were among those killed when aircraft pounded a building where a wedding celebration was underway.
Don’t forget the baby ducks and kittens.
But Brig.-Gen. Mark Kimmitt says his forces had good reason to attack. "It’s important to understand that this operation was not something that just fell out of the sky."
Shit, Kimmit! With one-liners like that you’re gonna be packin’ them in from miles around!
"We had significant intelligence that caused us to conduct a military operation into the middle of the desert, 85 kilometres south of Husaybah and 25 kilometres inside from the Syrian border ... this is one of those routes we have watched for a long period of time, as a place where foreign fighters and smugglers come into this country." Gen. James Mattis of the U.S. Marine Corps, said his troops have nothing to apologize for, adding, "Let’s not be naive, bad things happen in wars."
Posted by:Rafael

#10  Chris, knock that shit off. Those goat-humpers don't like being called camel-fuckers, ya know...
Posted by: Raj   2004-05-21 12:54:01 PM  

#9  If you people are incapable of getting "married" without shooting into the air, then you deserve what you get.

You live in a nation AT WAR, you stupid camel-fuckers.

All this talk about the "tradition" of shooting off firearms is absurd on a multitude of levels. Here's a clue: Mohammed didn't need to shoot firearms in HIS day (they didn't exist of course), so why the hell do you?

You can expect death to rain down upon you every time you "celebrate" in such a fashion. You can either wise up and stop shooting or you can give Allah a big kiss when you see him in hell.
Posted by: Chris W.   2004-05-21 9:44:41 AM  

#8  Calls for a 'Wedding Party Comission' by the left in 5, 4, 3, 2,...
Posted by: CrazyFool   2004-05-21 9:03:21 AM  

#7  CPA Briefing 5-20-2004:

We had significant intelligence which caused us to conduct a military operation into the middle of the desert, 85 kilometers south of Husaybah, al Qaim, and 25 kilometers inside from the Syrian border. Relatively barren area. We had a group of people there, not Bedouin. They were -- would appear to have been town dwellers. You saw 4x4s, jewelry. This is one of those routes that we have watched for a long period of time as a place where foreign fighters and smugglers come into this country.

We have consistently talked inside this forum about the foreign fighter flow. This was clearly, in our -- the intelligence that we had suggested that this was a foreign fighter "rat line," as we call them, one of the way stations. We conducted military operations down there last night. The ground force that swept through the objective found a significant amount of material and intelligence which validated that attack. And we are satisfied at this point that the intelligence that led us there was validated by what we found on the ground, and it was not that there was a wedding party going on...

The persons that we had on the ground did not find -- and they were on the ground for an extensive period of time -- they did not find any dead children among the casualties of that engagement...

Obviously, for operational and security reasons, I can't reveal much of the details of what got us there and what we did while we were there. But I am persuaded that, again, the purposes that caused us to conduct that operation in the middle of the barren desert in the early mornings (sic) of the hour, which is kind of an odd time to be having a wedding, against what we believed to be 34 to 35 men and a number of women, less than a handful of women, which doesn't seem to be numbers that one would associate with a wedding, by a group in their four-by- fours, well away from any town, in a known RAT line, which is being used by smugglers and foreign fighters frequently, and other intelligence that we found on the ground, pretty well convinces us that what got us there had a valid purpose...

But we are satisfied that the intelligence that we had, the multiple correlated evidence that got us there, and the actions of our forces on the ground, what they found and what they brought back -- foreign passports, money, weapons, satellite communications -- would be inconsistent with a wedding party for sure, and fairly consistent with what we have seen throughout this country time after time after time, which is the flow of foreign fighters to come in to terrorize and kill the Iraqi citizens.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2004-05-21 8:34:16 AM  

#6  I liked Rush's take on it yesterday saying it was 3 am so it may have been a bachelor party and they were running around with women's underwear on their heads and shooting off their AK's....
Posted by: Bill Nelson   2004-05-21 8:33:03 AM  

#5   U.S. stands by its attack on Iraqi wedding party

Gotta love the CBC's unbiased, impartial headlines.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-05-21 6:49:12 AM  

#4  Mattis is what we call a warrior monk. Has dedicated his whole life to his profession as a fighter. He also has the great attribute of not mincing words.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-05-21 6:08:47 AM  

#3  Ha ha!
Hose, I luv ya, man - great comment!
Posted by: Scooter McGruder   2004-05-21 5:07:27 AM  

#2  Is it possible that both stories are true. Let's compromise with we whacked a wedding party at an illegal ammo dump. Everybody happy?
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-05-21 4:28:02 AM  

#1  
Gen. James Mattis of the U.S. Marine Corps, said his troops have nothing to apologize for, adding, "Let’s not be naive, bad things happen in wars."
'Bout damn time somebody spoke the truth. It's a certainty nobody on the other side (the media, for instance) will.
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-05-21 2:53:32 AM  

00:00