You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
CFR Speaker: Rudolph Giuliani - The War on Terrorism
2004-05-14
Excerpt:
I'm asked, and have been asked for the last two years or more almost continuously-and usually with the person having the distinct viewpoint who asks it-isn't the world more dangerous now? And, in particular, isn't New York more dangerous, and isn't the United States more dangerous, and isn't the world more dangerous since the attacks of September 11th, 2001? After all, since then we've had, domestically, anthrax attacks, we've had several very, very horrific, horrible terrorist attacks in Bali and in Madrid. We fought a war in Afghanistan, we fought a war in Iraq, and we have the aftermath of it still going on. And we are continuously hearing about terrorist threats here, other places, warnings of all different kinds. And we live under the threat, and maybe the reality, that there will be other terrorist attacks here and in other places, and it's just a matter of when, and can we figure them out in advance, and can we remediate them if they happen? So, to many people, the world is a lot more dangerous than it was before September 11, 2001.

I have exactly the opposite opinion. I believe the world is safer than it was before September 11th, 2001, and I believe it's safer in very realistic ways-in ways that it wasn't before that. And let me see if I can explain to you why. It doesn't mean the world is perfectly safe, and it doesn't mean that we're at the level of safety that we should be at, but we're certainly better off than we were when we didn't know or didn't appreciate. The whole terrorist movement, for many people now as they look at it, almost seems like it started on September 11th, 2001. Terrorism was going on in the world on major levels for a very long time before September 11, 2001. The world was no more dangerous on that day or the day after than it was the day before or the week before or a month before or a year before, or several years before September 11-or even longer than that. I trace-and you can do this different ways-I trace the modern terrorist movement to the attacks on the Israeli Olympic team at the Munich Olympics, because if you need a starting point for analyzing it, that could probably be the best starting point. And that was when? That was in 1972.
Quite a good discussion. Read the whole thing.
Posted by:Super Hose

#9  'Jewliani' and his babbling....
Posted by: Faisal the Goyem   2004-05-14 7:41:32 PM  

#8  Rudy could've gone back further than Munich to the 1968 murder of Bobby Kennedy by Sirhan Sirhan.

Unlike a lot of infamous assassins (and would be assassins) in our history, Sirhan wasn't a love lorn nut or a frustrated job seeker. Sirhan's diaries make it plain that he was upset with Kenndy's "support" of Israel in the '67 war. The murder was overtly political.

The LLL in this country ignore that as well as the communist sympathy of Oswald because it gives the Right wingers some credibility.

I'd love Rudy for Senator of NY, VP, or even Prez someday. A Good Man!!!
Posted by: JDB   2004-05-14 8:38:25 PM  

#7  by the way Faisal, dipshit.....Giuliani is Catholic...you're not even a decent troll. Inadequate in all ways.....let me guess, Arab?
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-14 7:45:12 PM  

#6  troll report....
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-14 7:44:00 PM  

#5  Rudy doesn't babble--he makes good sense clearly and cogently.
Go, Rudy, Go! We love you!
Posted by: Annie Moose   2004-05-14 7:43:45 PM  

#4  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Faisal the Goyem TROLL   2004-05-14 7:41:32 PM  

#3  Damn, pretty good analysis for a biped. I'm a liking giuliano he reminds me of me when i was a baby in the pod.
Posted by: Shamu   2004-05-14 4:50:52 PM  

#2  B, I think that, currently, he is the sixth man for the GOP. If Cheney keeled over tomorrow, you could insert Giuliani without a credibility loss. Some would say, "Do it today. Cheney is a liability."
I disagree. Cheney is vital. The Giuliano card can only be played once. In his current capacity he can stump with any GOP candidate nationwide.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-05-14 3:02:49 PM  

#1  excellent read. I wish he would be given a bigger role to play than what he has now.
Posted by: B   2004-05-14 8:24:10 AM  

00:00