You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Leash Gal’s sex pix ( NYP)
2004-05-13
Maybe the Army should consider segregating the troops by sex again.
Shocking shots of sexcapades involving Pfc. Lynndie England were among the hundreds of X-rated photos and videos from the Abu Ghraib prison scandal shown to lawmakers in a top-secret Capitol conference room yesterday. "She was having sex with numerous partners. It appeared to be consensual," said a lawmaker who saw the photos.
"Next! Sign the consent form and drop yer drawers!"
And, videos showed the disgraced soldier - made notorious in a photo showing her holding a leash looped around an Iraqi prisoner’s neck - engaged in graphic sex acts with other soldiers in front of Iraqi prisoners, Pentagon officials told NBC Nightly News. "Almost everybody was naked all the time," another lawmaker said.
The Army sure has changed since I was in...
Many members of Congress left the 45-minute viewing session early, thereby missing the porno performance by England, but there were enough other images of torture, humiliation and intimidation to sicken anyone. "It was pretty disgusting, not what you’d expect from Americans," said Sen. Norm Coleman (R-Minn.). "There was lots of sexual stuff - not of the Iraqis, but of our troops."
Actually, I'm trying to figure what our troops diddling each other has to do with the abuse of Iraqi bad guys. Or was this on company time?
Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-Calif.), who also characterized the photos as "disgusting," agreed, noting, "It’s hard to believe that this actually is taking place in a military facility." The shocking photos and videos, provided on computer disks by Pentagon officials, showed attack dogs snarling at cowering prisoners, Iraqi women forced to expose their breasts, and naked prisoners tied together on the floor, senators revealed as they emerged from the heavily guarded conference room. "It was significantly worse than I had anticipated," said Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore). "Take the worst case and multiply it over several times."

"I don’t know how these people got into our Army," said Sen. Ben Nighthorse Campbell (R-Colo.), who reported seeing "several pictures of Iraqi women who were disrobed or putting their shirts up."

Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.) described the images as "more detailed and more graphic than the pictures that have been released publicly," referring to the disturbing photos of Iraqis being abused at Abu Ghraib prison that surfaced two weeks ago, and which Islamic terrorists claim led to this week’s revenge beheading of American Nick Berg. "Normally, I side with disclosure and openness, but in this case, these photos are evidence," Schumer said, indicating that he favors keeping the lid on the alarming pictures, as Vice President Dick Cheney and Sen. John Warner (R-Va.) have urged. Rep. Jane Harman (Calif.), ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said she was most appalled by a video of a handcuffed prisoner beating his head against a wall in an apparent bid to knock himself unconscious to escape abuse.
Ummmm... In an apparent bid for something or other. I saw the same thing on COPS last week, and nobody was abusing the guy...
In another video clip, she said, a group of men were shown masturbating.
Which men? Prisoners or jailers?
Before the pictures of England’s sex romps were shown to Congress, the 21-year-old reservist from West Virginia tried to portray herself as a reluctant participant who was just following orders. "I didn’t really, I mean, want to be in any pictures," England told a Denver TV station. "I was instructed by persons in higher rank to ’stand there, hold this leash, look at the camera,’ and they took picture for PsyOps [psychological operations]," she told KCNC-TV. England acknowledged "it was kind of weird" when she was photographed smiling, with a cigarette in her mouth, as she leaned forward and pointed at the genitals of a naked, hooded Iraqi at Abu Ghraib prison. England has refused to identify who gave her the orders, saying only that they came from "persons in my chain of command." England faces a military court-martial that includes charges such as conspiracy to maltreat prisoners and assault consummated by battery. She could face punishment ranging from a reprimand to more than 15 years in prison.
Give her her reprimand, kick her out of the Army, and let her get on with her budding career as a porn artiste...
Posted by:JerseyMike

#16  propername is mullet girl
Posted by: NotHalfEmpty   2004-05-13 7:50:08 PM  

#15  Check out the Stanford experiment which shows how easily thiings can go bad in a prison situation.
Posted by: Phil_B   2004-05-13 7:24:29 PM  

#14  Actually, I'm trying to figure what our troops diddling each other has to do with the abuse of Iraqi bad guys. Or was this on company time?

Whether it was on company time or not, she was apparently violating the fraternization rules, with multiple partners, without birth control, and in a war zone... any way you look at it, this sounds like a massive breach of discipline. Of course she'll say it's because the evil MI people and Rumsfeld (who they'll allege was watching the whole thing from his Pentagon office on CCTV) used their mind control rays on her...

But my point is, if she and her codefendants were already committing these sorts of breaches of discipline for personal amusement, this would tend to reinforce the hypothesis that they were not conducting their abuses of the prisoners because of orders from the chain of command or attached MI officers, but were doing it for kicks.

(Oh, and the fact that she wasn't even cleared to be in the area also would tend to reinforce the hypothesis as well. It would tend to violate the sort of informantional segregation intelligence units have _historically_ practiced, AFAICT.)

Just my $.02.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-05-13 6:28:31 PM  

#13  If I hear "but it was all ordered by people in my chain of command" one more time I'm going to have to get a new skepticism meter.

I thought the batteries were dead in this one, but then I turned it right-side-up.
Posted by: Phil Fraering   2004-05-13 6:19:10 PM  

#12  Can anybody surmise just what purpose was served by having England doing this in front of the prisoners ?

Or, is it likely that this was completely done at the personal volition of herself and a couple of others (to make some money in some porno subgenre ?)
Posted by: Carl in N.H.   2004-05-13 5:55:40 PM  

#11  Web Page for Baghdad Prison MPs
Posted by: BigEd   2004-05-13 5:10:45 PM  

#10  Feinstein is right to be disgusted. Nothing like this ever took place in San Francisco while she was mayor.
Posted by: Mr. Davis   2004-05-13 4:45:56 PM  

#9  Gotta wonder who up her chain of command ordered her to have sex for the cameras. Or is her other story a bunch of crap. Odds are they knew she'd be willing to do anything so when they got around to abusing the prisoners in a sexual way her boyfriend called her up. The orders were probably suggestions from the cameraman and not actual orders.
Posted by: ruprecht   2004-05-13 4:43:03 PM  

#8  I read this and thought...
"This sounds more like a girls gone wild video than an atrocities tape."
Posted by: Anonymous4021   2004-05-13 1:45:56 PM  

#7  Okay, I'm gonna make a plea here that these pictures never, ever be made public. Ulgh!
Posted by: Cthulhu Akbar   2004-05-13 3:24:17 PM  

#6  RC: Good point! This girl's lookin' more and more like a looser and that she was out for a good time instead of being a real soldier.
Posted by: BA   2004-05-13 3:03:28 PM  

#5  Ya gotta wonder...who in their right freakin' mind would put a female soldier in as a prison guard full of hardened criminals (remember this wing of the prison was for the hardest criminals) and not expect some kind of sexual aura to overcome the area?

No one.

She wasn't assigned to the prison; she was a paper-pusher handling admissions and records-keeping. Her boyfriend was assigned to the cell block, and she went in there to be with him.

No one ordered her to be there; she was there voluntarily.
Posted by: Robert Crawford   2004-05-13 2:49:31 PM  

#4  Oh great. Now we're gonna end up with Playboy doing a "Women of Abu Ghraib" article.
Posted by: Mercutio   2004-05-13 2:14:13 PM  

#3  The orders, came from "persons in my chain of command." She was a private! Everyone was in her 'chain of command'! She is covering her ass! About time if what is said about the photos is true!
Posted by: Cyber Sarge (VRWC CA Chapter)   2004-05-13 2:03:47 PM  

#2  Gotta love Ben Nighthorse Campbell's comment...how in the hell did people like this get in our Army? Well, it couldn't be b/c of the sexcapades going on in the "oral" office under previous admin. Or the feminazis' insistence that women be on the front line. Ya gotta wonder...who in their right freakin' mind would put a female soldier in as a prison guard full of hardened criminals (remember this wing of the prison was for the hardest criminals) and not expect some kind of sexual aura to overcome the area?
Posted by: BA   2004-05-13 1:50:39 PM  

#1  the Paris Hilton of Iraq! Soon to be appearing on a pay for Pr0n site near you.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2004-05-13 1:43:11 PM  

00:00