| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| Dirty bomb fears rising |
| 2004-05-09 |
| Concerns are growing that Al Qaeda or a related group could detonate a "dirty bomb" that would spew radioactive fallout across an American or European city, according to intelligence analysts, diplomats and independent nuclear experts. Intelligence agencies have reported no reliable, specific threats involving dirty bombs or nuclear weapons, but senior U.S. and European officials and outside experts said several factors had heightened fears in recent weeks. They said concerns were focused on three Al Qaeda operatives who led experiments involving dirty bombs and chemical weapons and on widely held suspicions that a special wing of the terrorist network was planning a spectacular attack. They also said that chatter justifying the use of nuclear weapons against the U.S. had increased on radical Islamic websites as the occupation of Iraq stretches into its second year. One focus of anxiety is the Athens Olympic Games in August. Recent security exercises there concentrated on mock attacks involving a dirty bomb, a chemical explosion and a hijacked jetliner. Another potential target is the North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit scheduled for June in Istanbul, Turkey, which will be attended by President Bush. The threat was underlined by Turkey's disclosure Monday that it had arrested members of a group linked to Al Qaeda who reportedly planned to bomb the summit. The threat of attack is great enough that a senior European intelligence official said it is "not a matter of if there is a nuclear-related attack by Al Qaeda, but when it occurs." The warning echoed remarks made last June by Eliza Manningham-Buller, director of Britain's domestic intelligence service, MI5. She said renegade scientists have aided Al Qaeda's efforts to develop chemical, biological, radiological and nuclear weapons, sometimes referred to as CBRN. "Sadly, given the widespread proliferation of the technical knowledge to construct these weapons, it will only be a matter of time before a crude version of a CBRN attack is launched at a major Western city and only a matter of time before that crude version becomes something more sophisticated," she told a London think tank. Experts inside and outside government said sophisticated extremists have the ability to plan and execute the detonation of a dirty bomb. They had no answer for why a dirty bomb has not been unleashed. "I'm very surprised that a radiological device hasn't gone off," said Matthew Bunn, a nuclear expert at Harvard's Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. "There is a bigger puzzle — why no Al Qaeda attacks since Sept. 11 in the U.S.?" The European intelligence official said planning for a large-scale attack has suffered setbacks with the arrests of numerous Al Qaeda operatives. But, he added, "the division is still focused on spectaculars, and they take three or four years to plan and execute." U.S. intelligence has long known that Al Qaeda coveted a nuclear weapon, but there is no evidence that it has succeeded in getting one. "We won't know if Al Qaeda has its hands on this kind of material until it is too late," said M.J. Gohel, head of the Asia-Pacific Foundation in London. Building a dirty bomb is far easier, and the terrorist network's attempts to do so have been documented through evidence uncovered in Afghanistan and elsewhere. Three men identified as Al Qaeda's weapons of mass destruction committee would likely plan the attack, said two European intelligence officials and independent experts. The committee leader is Midhat Mursi, an Egyptian chemical engineer also known as Abu Khabab. Officials said he is regarded as Al Qaeda's master bomb builder and is one of the group's most-wanted fugitives — although there have been unconfirmed reports that Mursi is in U.S. custody. A second member is Assadalah Abdul Rahman, a son of Omar Abdul Rahman, the blind Egyptian cleric convicted in the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center. The son ran a camp near Jalalabad, Afghanistan, that provided training in chemical weapons. The third was identified as Abu Bashir Yemeni, who also worked in the Afghan training camps and at a house in Kabul, the Afghan capital, that authorities suspect was the committee's headquarters. Documents describing research into chemical weapons and dirty bombs were discovered in the house by CNN in late 2001. In caves used by Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, U.S. troops also found detailed instructions on how to manufacture and deploy a dirty bomb. Much of Al Qaeda's leadership has been destroyed, but counter-terrorism experts said the organization is divided into two tiers. The more visible wing is loosely aligned with other extremist groups and helps organize small-scale attacks on "soft targets," such as the conventional bombings in Bali, Indonesia; Casablanca, Morocco; Istanbul; and Madrid. Long-term planning for a bigger attack in the U.S. or Europe is being carried out by a second core group of experienced Al Qaeda figures, including the weapons committee, according to the European intelligence official and two counter-terrorism experts. "There is a sense that one part of Al Qaeda is waiting and putting into place the big, spectacular attack," said Magnus Ranstorp, director of the Center for the Study of Terrorism and Political Violence at the University of St. Andrews in Scotland. "It will come out of left field, and it may well be a dirty bomb." U.S. authorities say they thwarted the beginnings of a dirty bomb plot with the arrest of Jose Padilla in Chicago in May 2002. Al Qaeda leaders had sent Padilla, a U.S. citizen, on a reconnaissance mission, authorities say. He is being held as an enemy combatant. U.S. officials are concerned that the material is within reach of Islamic extremists and Chechen rebels in the Pankisi Gorge, a remote area near Georgia's border with the breakaway Russian republic of Chechnya. Chechen rebels were responsible for the only known incident involving a dirty bomb. In 1995, they planted an explosive device containing cesium in a Moscow park, then informed reporters of its location before it was detonated. Authorities believe that the tipoff was a warning but that the Chechens were not prepared to risk the retaliation likely to be provoked by detonating a dirty bomb. |
| Posted by:Dan Darling |
| #7 Zippy, we've been over this before...at great length. The problem is determining which rogue state is behind the bomb, if it occurs. Zeroing in on Mecca & Medina regardless of which state is the sponsor just to punish Islam as a whole really isn't and shouldn't be much of an option to us. |
| Posted by: Jen 2004-05-09 10:02:26 PM |
| #6 From "U.S. planning for Israeli strike at Iran": I hope that the Israelis, in addition to preparing to take out Iranian facilities, are also quietly letting it be known that the first nuke aimed at Israel from anyone - source unimportant - gets a couple of nukes dropped squarely on Mecca. If they let it be known that screwing with them, nuclear-wise, gets your "holy" black rock vaporized, Allah willing or not, it would be interesting to see who still thinks nuking Israel is a good idea. - Barbara Skolaut - Barbara: I'd hope the USA would (quietly, privately and diplomatically, of course) adopt the same policy you recommended for Israel: should a smuggled or otherwise-delivered nuclear device ever be detonated on American soil, the 'holy shrines' of the cities of both Mecca and Medina immediately become very shiny and highly radioactive glass. Bummer for the following year's Hadj, though... - BK - Oops, I thought I was supposed to be the only misguided soul around here recommending retaliation-in-kind. Guess I'm not alone. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2004-05-09 9:22:52 PM |
| #5 Admiral Zenni, Vladimir's vicious and heavy-handed put-down of the "insurrection" in Chechnya hasn't been that successful and it certainly didn't stop the Islamists from taking 800 people hostage in a Moscow theatre + pulling off scores of other attacks. The Al Queda-linked Chechen terrorists haven't pulled off a nuke attack, yet, but they've killed lots of Russians other ways, including offing the Chechen president today. I *knew* you'd have to post on this thread! The Bush Administration has people working 24/7 both at home and abroad to make sure there isn't an NBC attack here at home. Short of putting a Super Patriot Act in place here and basically putting America under lockdown, which is neither constitutional nor practical, and adopting a preemptive nuke attack strategy abroad--as you keep screaming about--we're doing all that is humanly possible. If we were to nuke Mecca to avoid a nuke attack here, we really would be as awful as our enemies suggest and they would surely hate us then and with excellent reason. Iraq and Afghanistan are where we need to be, where our soldiers are taking on the Islamofascists there and not here in the streets of America. |
| Posted by: Jen 2004-05-09 8:51:22 PM |
| #4 The threat of attack is great enough that a senior European intelligence official said it is "not a matter of if there is a nuclear-related attack by Al Qaeda, but when it occurs." So long as Europe is still willing to support terror groups like the Palestinian Authority they will not comprehend their vulnerability. Authorities believe that the tipoff was a warning but that the Chechens were not prepared to risk the retaliation likely to be provoked by detonating a dirty bomb. Considering how the Soviets responded to a Palestinian kidnapping of their diplomats in 1985, the Chechens' hesitation to unleash a radiological device in Moscow seems rather well founded. Too bad American and Europe have yet to see the wisdom of devastating retaliation. Yes, it's harsh but I can foresee few other, if any, solutions to deterring Islamist terror. Terrorist detonation of a radiological device should result in Medina or Mecca (or both) being dusted with quantities of the exact same isotope. Let Islam experience the joy of spending billions to decontaminate their precious shrines. At some point reciprocity in the form of retaliation-in-kind will have to appear on the table. I vote for sooner than later. |
| Posted by: Zenster 2004-05-09 8:39:51 PM |
| #3 Damn no wonder socks are getting so expensive. |
| Posted by: Shipman 2004-05-09 10:55:49 AM |
| #2 I'm wonering if the reason there's been no RDD attcks yet is b'cause the jihadis start playing with the pretty glowing powder and... It makes sense in light of all the problems associated with the red wire/ black wire thing. "never ascribe to enemy action that which can be attributed to your own stupidity/ignorance." -from many postings on .military.hist on usenet |
| Posted by: N Guard 2004-05-09 10:41:25 AM |
| #1 Therefore our enlightened leaders continue to permit Wahabi terrorists to operate most mosques in the Free World. When stupidity prospers, none dare call it stupidity. |
| Posted by: Man Bites Dog 2004-05-09 10:30:13 AM |