You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Arabia
STRATFOR INTELLIGENCE BRIEF
2004-05-08
Summary
A number of Stratfor sources have indicated that militants are in the final stages of planning attacks on Middle Eastern targets. Based on the identity of -- and intelligence from -- these sources, Stratfor expects any attack to occur in Saudi Arabia, and we doubt it will be an isolated incident.

Analysis
Beginning May 4 and rolling over into May 5, Stratfor received a number of tips from sources in, or knowledgeable about, the Middle East indicating there is an imminent attack planned. As we triangulated that information with intelligence from additional sources, Stratfor has deduced that an attack is most likely to occur within Saudi Arabia, and that it will target Westerners as opposed to Saudis.

The security situation in the kingdom continues to degrade for a
variety of reasons. The mix of source information on the threat crosses business and government intelligence lines in both the United States and the Middle East. All sources have repeatedly proven their value to Stratfor, and that they are all -- independently -- warning of a possible attack makes this a threat that we take very seriously. To put the gravity of the threat in context, militants shot and killed five Western expatriates May 1 in Yanbu, a petrochemical town on the Red Sea coast. Two days later, U.S. Ambassador to Saudi Arabia James Oberwetter advised all Americans living in the kingdom to leave.

The problem Westerners face in Saudi Arabia is three-fold.
First, U.S. policy indirectly stoked the current militant activity in Saudi Arabia. After the Sept. 11 attacks, Washington deemed Saudi efforts against al Qaeda insufficient. The reasoning for the Saudi tentativeness up to that point was obvious: Al Qaeda’s ideological home is rooted in the Wahhabi Islam that dominates the kingdom. For al Qaeda, the royal family’s affiliation with Western interests is a betrayal of Islam and the Sauds are guilty of apostasy. Historically, the royals have dealt with this by providing the country’s militants with an out: Go fight infidels elsewhere. This strategy worked well, and Saudi Arabia exported its militants to places such as Afghanistan and Chechnya. After Sept. 11 -- when several of these "exports" attacked New York City and Washington -- the United States confronted Riyadh over the practice. Stripped of the ability to simply send the militants elsewhere, Riyadh was forced -- by U.S. design -- to deal with the militants within the kingdom. More militants at home mean more militant activity at home -- which means more problems for Western guests.

The second problem Westerners in Saudi Arabia face is that the militants have adjusted their operational methods. The Yanbu attacks were not only the first attacks in that city, or even in the Hijaz region; they were also the first attacks in which the militants infiltrated the company employing the victims, even obtaining valid company identification cards. Such sophistication is not only frightening, considering the local nature of the militants, but nearly impossible to defend against.

Third, the Saudis are still on the learning curve. The intricacies of tribal loyalties -- and the unique role of religious go-betweens with a leg on each side of the fence -- always have complicated the process of gathering actionable intelligence. But in the aftermath of the November bombings of housing compounds in Riyadh, local Muslims were so outraged that the militants would attack other Muslims that many -- even in the Najd region, from which many militants hail -- were willing to cooperate with Saudi authorities to root out militant cells. That resulted in a quantum leap in Saudi intelligence capabilities. But the effort remains in its infancy; Saudi domestic intelligence efforts were never robust -- and they still are not. After all, the emphasis before Sept. 11 was on getting the militants out of country, not into Saudi prisons.
Taken together, these factors all indicate that the Saudi security situation is tangibly decaying, and local authorities are increasingly unable to adequately protect foreigners. Expect more Yanbus.
Posted by:tipper

#7  Better, but tired. I can think of lots of things to do that are more fun than surgery...
Posted by: Fred   2004-05-08 9:19:10 PM  

#6  D'oh! thanks Meister Pruitt - how're you feeling?
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-08 7:03:21 PM  

#5  Select the text, click the SQUISH button, hard returns are goners...
Posted by: Fred   2004-05-08 6:57:43 PM  

#4  This looks like a poem.

Ah, yup. tipper, hard carriage returns are not your friend.
Posted by: Zenster   2004-05-08 1:23:54 PM  

#3  It is a miracle that attacks like the one in Yanbu did not happen sooner. I do not know if anybody remembers the following article published in the NY Times two summers ago: Intelligence officials say the discovery of al Qaeda sympathizers inside Saudi Aramco.
February 13, New York Times — Pro-al Qaeda oil workers a sabotage risk for Saudis. The government of Saudi Arabia has increased security around its oil fields and processing centers after the discovery that employees of the state-owned oil company sympathetic to al Qaeda were discussing sabotage plans late last summer, American and Saudi officials say. American intelligence officials discovered the conversations and alerted the Saudi authorities, who quickly arrested and interrogated the suspects, the officials added. The quiet thwarting of the potentially disastrous sabotage, disclosed in October by ABC News, is seen by officials here and in Washington as a model of cooperation for a relationship that has been under strain since the disclosure of the role of Saudis in the terrorist attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Still, the sabotage case and the response to it underscore the deep anxieties about the security of Saudi oil when a war with Iraq could make it more valuable, but also more vulnerable, than ever. Intelligence officials say the discovery of al Qaeda sympathizers inside Saudi Aramco is part of a worrisome trend: al Qaeda's leadership appears to be increasingly focused on economic targets, especially the oil industry.

Source: http://www.nytimes.com/2003/02/13/international/middleeast/1 3SAUD.html

Posted by: Anonymous4617   2004-05-08 10:19:16 AM  

#2  have indicated that militants are in the final stages of planning attacks on Middle Eastern targets.

Son of a B! Call in the Dogs!

People pay real money for this?
Posted by: Shipman   2004-05-08 10:00:00 AM  

#1  This looks like a poem.
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-05-08 9:30:48 AM  

00:00