You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
Lileks on Rummy
2004-05-06
The minute I heard Biden refer to Rumsfeld with the magic words - “what did he know, and when did he know it?” - I knew that the Iraqi POW story had jumped the shark. Or rather jumped a pyramid of blindfolded, homoerotic sharks. It’s not the question, it’s the words: use of the Vietnam and Watergate era terms are like an incarnation that will topple the current administration. I almost expect someone to ask whether there is a cancer on the presidency, a chancre, or a weeping mole. Stop it! STOP LIVING IN THE PAST!

What really bastes my brisket (did I just write that? I need a beer.) is the constant desire to return us to the nadir of the post-war era. They want us to think: quagmire. They want us to think: Nixonian scandal. How inspirational. How Churchillian. I have nothing to offer the American people but blood, sweat and Billy Beer.

But worst of all is the suggestion that Rumsfeld should resign. Stupid for two reasons: 1. He doesn’t have a bogeyman rep with the general electorate. In fact I’d guess that your average swing voter likes the guy – he doesn’t deal in Beltway blatherations, for starters. Some people liked to make fun of his foray into epistemology – “There are known knowns. There are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns. That is to say, we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns, the ones we don't know we don't know.” Makes perfect sense to me. I’m serious. I like a guy who’s smart enough to entertain the concept of unknown unknowns, because it means he’s thinking (all together now!) out of the box. Or out of the Pentagon.

He also handles the press well, which irritates the inner party of the Beltway media but amuses the red states. And he grins. He has that flinty-dad vibe. He’s the guy flipping burgers at the grill who overhears something you say and makes an interesting remark that might be a compliment, and might be an insult – might be both. That grin doesn’t tell you much. It’s the sort of persona that would make you gulp hard if you were picking up his daughter for a date, but if you passed the test you’d feel as though you’d earned some rare respect.

But more importantly, 2. He’s the guy who’s attempting to reform the Pentagon, and make it limber enough to meet the challenges of The War. Does Joe Biden have a better plan for the Pentagon? Would Joe Biden be a better SecDef in the Kerry Administration? If so: evidence, please. If not, then his calls for Rumsfeld to consider stepping down might be - gasp – partisan positioning. That Biden would float the idea of axing Rumsfeld in the middle of this confliict over this tells you how seriously he takes the war. He knows what he says won’t bring victory next year. But it will get him on TV tonight, and perhaps in the Times tomorrow.

Priorities, don’t you know. Priorities.
Posted by:Steve

#7  Lileks - One shot. One kill.
Posted by: .com   2004-05-06 10:01:16 PM  

#6  Oh yeah, dragging up old Watergate-era slogans is REALLY gonna get the Gen X and Y vote.
Just like trotting out ol' Teddy Kennedy.
Good Lord, who the hell does the Democrats' marketing, anyway? I'm a liberal arts grad and I could do better than that!
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2004-05-06 8:28:48 PM  

#5  I saw Rockefeller (D) speaking immediately after the broadcast and I thought he was even more disgusting. He basically had the same talking points, trying to connect Bush to this through Rummey and Wolfewitz. Instead of saying something like, this is not America - Moslem's should know that the president is right - he basically tried to fire up Moslem outrage and then prostituted his countrymen for a couple of votes. I'm going to ask the FCC to fine the station for showing this disgusting act of public prostitution on prime time TV.

I know this plays to their Democratic base, and I know it has an impact - but I think they are playing a dangerous game that, in the end, they will lose.
Posted by: Anny Emous   2004-05-06 12:40:45 PM  

#4  Everytime I see Biden yapping away, I also think back to the plagiarizing of Kinnock. What do the professionals call it? Projecting? "I screwed up and to make sure I pay back in spades, EVERYBODY had to follow MY advice in not making the same transgression"

Biden ought to be asking for Mueller's and Tenet's heads. Rummy and DOD are the only ones thinking out of the box. But of course, Tenet and Mueller are not part of the NeoCon Cabal.
Posted by: Michael   2004-05-06 12:34:07 PM  

#3  "[W]hat did he know, and when did he know it?”

These words were nails in Nixon's coffin only because they came from a member of his own party.
Posted by: eLarson   2004-05-06 11:56:50 AM  

#2  A friend of mine for over 30 years lives in Delaware. And even he, a Liberal Democrat, considers Biden "comic releif".
Posted by: BigEd   2004-05-06 11:47:35 AM  

#1  Biden totally disgusts me - he should've dropped from public eye when he was caught plagiarizing Neil Kinnock's bio in a presidential campaign speech - when was that, '88? He hasn't gotten any smarter or developed better ethics since, apparently.

Hewitt calls him: "the attention-starved, dense-as-cement statesman from Delaware"
Posted by: Frank G   2004-05-06 11:00:41 AM  

00:00