| Submit your comments on this article |
| Terror Networks |
| One Type of Terrorism Is Praised by Allan; One Type Is Dispraised by Allan |
| 2004-04-20 |
| Allan’s distinctions explained by the Followers of Ahl us-Sunnati wal-Jamaa’ah .... There are two types of terrorism, one that is praised by almighty The form of terrorism used by the US, UK and its alliance is indeed aggression, crime, corruption and tyranny – worthy of severe punishment and disgrace by almighty However, these acts of violence by the Mujaahideen are carried out against people who support, worship and obey Taaghout. It is also against people who they have no covenant of security with. Islaam condemns betrayal i.e. to live among people with whom you have a covenant of security and then to kill them and take their wealth. For those who have a covenant of security, such as those who have citizenship or an agreement with the regime they live under in countries such as the US, UK, Spain, Italy etc
(as opposed to living under the apostate rulers in Muslim countries) it is completely prohibited to carry out any acts of violence against those whom they have a covenant with, and is in fact a great sin and considered to be betrayal in Islaam. The definition of terrorism according to the kuffaar is irrelevant and insignificant for Muslims. This is because we only refer to Islaam as a marji’ i.e. a reference point and furqaan (criteria). In any case their definition of terrorism is also applicable to themselves as they systematically use acts of violence against ’innocent’ people to further their own selfish political aims. Muslims should not be afraid of being called terrorists, fundamentalists or extremists. Firstly, because it is just part of the disbeliever’s propaganda against Islaam and Muslims, which was also used against the messenger Muhammad (saw) and his companions; who were labelled as terrorists, extremists, magicians, liars and sorcerers! Secondly, because it is true; we are terrorists as The Muslims should be aware that the disbelievers will always play a war of terminology in order to silence the believers and make us appear to be the aggressors. However, this will never effect the Muwahhideen (those who love |
| Posted by:Mike Sylwester |
| #1 "Violence against aggressors, oppressors and tyrants is pro-life, whereas violence initiated (such as that by the US & UK in Afghanistan and in Iraq) against young women, children and the elderly is against life..." Uh-oh, look out! These guys are going to attack the Palestinians, since those guys blow up kids and women and old people all the time! Seriously, the actual default position of people like this is: "If we like it, then Allah likes it and has always liked it; if we don't, then Allah doesn't either, even if he liked it last week." |
| Posted by: Just John 2004-04-20 3:09:48 AM |