You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Gore Commission watered down CAPPS I after lobbying by CAIR
2004-04-13
EFL - kind of dated but relevant due to ongoing 9-11 Commission.

The Computer-Assisted Passenger Profiling System, or CAPPS, selected six hijackers for additional security screening on Sept. 11, because they bought one-way tickets using cash, things that show up as red flags in the system. But only their checked luggage was searched, authorities say. The selected passengers themselves weren’t searched or even questioned by airport security personnel. That’s because the so-called "Gore Commission" on aviation security last decade ruled out such profiling as discriminatory.

Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations lobbied hard against Arab-profiling at airports, enlisting lawmakers like Rep. David Bonior, a Democrat from a heavily Arab district in Michigan. He, in turn, lobbied FAA Administrator Jane Garvey. The airlines, which handled security at airport terminals, were also reluctant to profile Arabs.

"CAPPS was developed because the airline industry didn’t want to do human-profiling," said the FAA official, who wished to remain anonymous. "Yet human-profiling is the single-biggest deterrent against terrorism in the aviation industry." CAPPS ignores key terror predictors, he says, such as the nationality, ethnicity, religion, language and even the sex of passengers. Young men of Middle Eastern origin tend to fit the anti-American or anti-Israeli terrorist profile, authorities say.

The computerized system instead flags passengers based on relatively sterile criteria involving the purchase of their tickets. Did they pay cash or credit? How many days in advance of the flight? One-way or round-trip? Are they irregular or frequent fliers? Of course, such behavior can easily be changed by would-be hijackers to fool the system.

"CAPPS literally makes you a selectee based on how you purchase your ticket," the FAA official said. "It has nothing to do with fighting terrorism, in spite of what the FAA says."

The computer also selects a certain number of passengers by random. For example, United Airlines Flight 93 passenger Nicole Miller was selected on Sept. 11 to have her checked bags secretly swept. The 21-year-old was heading back home to San Jose, Calif., where she went to college and worked as a waitress at Chili’s. Her hijacked plane crashed in Pennsylvania shortly after take-off from Newark, N.J.

It would be interesting to see Gore, Bonoir and the FAA publically testify.
Posted by:Super Hose

#6  AlGore had nothing to do with this. He drank too much ice tea and was out taking a leak when they changed the rules.
Just ask him...
Posted by: tu3031   2004-04-13 7:02:46 PM  

#5  Bonior and Obey have been sucking at the Arab/CAIR teat for a long time...traitors
Posted by: Frank G   2004-04-13 6:10:55 PM  

#4  Even after 9/11, U.S. District Judge Florence-Marie Cooper didn't get with the program.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-04-13 3:44:36 PM  

#3  Raj here's one for your blog. In 1999 the ACLU was calling for us to stop racial profiling at airports ... even though Gore had already buckled. Stop Racial Profiling at American Airports!
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-04-13 3:42:00 PM  

#2  This is the kind of stuff that makes the history books.
Posted by: B   2004-04-13 3:19:03 PM  

#1  Ummm, wasn't Antiwar casting doubt on another thread as to whether a Gore administration would have invaded Afghanistan after 9/11? Here's a pretty strong indicator that he wouldn't have.
Posted by: Raj   2004-04-13 3:03:54 PM  

00:00