You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Iraq-Jordan
Paleo Boomers Join Mahdi Army
2004-04-08
EFL:
Palestinian fedayeen fighters have joined the ranks of the rebel Mahdi Army militia in recent days, militia leaders here told The Jerusalem Post Wednesday. The coalition forces accuse nutbag firebrand Shi'ite cleric Muqtada al-Sadr's Mahdi Army of stirring up a rebellion in a swath of predominately Shi'ite cities in the center and south of the country that led to more than 100 Iraqi and 20 coalition forces' deaths. Some 25 Palestinian fighters volunteered as suicide bombers against American troops, Sa'id Amr al-Husseini, one of Sadr's leading lieutenants said Wednesday at the headquarters of the Mahdi Army in Sadr City, Baghdad's largest Shi'ite neighborhood. "Yesterday the Palestinians came to these headquarters and expressed their desire to be martyrs, ready for sacrifice at the order of the Hawza," Husseini said.
OK, welcome to the kill zone.
I'm guessing this is the same flavor of Paleo that supported Sammy when he took over Kuwait, a fifth column that came crawling out of the woodwork. That resulted in the Paleos' expulsion from Kuwait, amid wails of anguish from the Washington Post. It would probably be a really good idea to give all the Paleos in Iraq 24 hours to get out of Dodge, but I doubt we'll do it.
The Hawza is Iraq's leading Shi'ite clerical order, believed to wield immense power among Shi'ites. The Mahdi Army's claim could not be independently confirmed, though Sunni leaders are increasingly willing to share in the "glory of jihad with the Shi'ites," said Abd Satar Jabani, imam of Baghdad's largest Wahhabi mosque on Tuesday.
Sunni's will fight till the last Shiite.
In the complex tangle of Iraqi politics, Saddam Hussein's abuse of the Shi'ite majority and his championing of the Palestinians made natural enemies of the two groups. But Husseini, using the catchword of "united jihad," said the war against the American occupiers has brought Iraqis, Sunni and Shi'ite, "together for martyrdom."
Don't forget the Iranians.
Sheikhs, tribal leaders, even businessmen have crowded into his cramped office since the start of the Shi'ite insurrection to offer, money, guns, and food to the outlawed militia, he said. At the militia's stronghold in Sadr City, black clad militiamen strut in and out, antique knives tucked into their trousers, pistols stuffed into belt loops.
The SS with turbans
Any Hitler Youth knives?
Husseini blamed the the bloodshed on the coalition forces. But internal pressure for a cease-fire among Shi'ites is mounting, even as clashes resumed Wednesday night. Shi'ite clerics, tribal sheikhs, and even Governing Council members are sending countless missives to Sadr in an effort to broker a cease-fire that would end the bloodshed. Sadr, holed up in Najaf, has balked. He will not fight, he said in a statement Wednesday. His fate will be "either assassination and martyrdom or arrest." Sadr's brinkmanship and the coalition's determination to rid Iraq of the Mahdi Army's brownshirts semi-organized confederations of outlaw fighters has disrupted what had been cordial US-Shi'ite relations.
He jumped the gun, his masters in Iran will not be pleased.
While fighting raged in Fallujah and Ramadi, there were signs the Shi'ite uprising might be close to burning itself out. A new poster crowned the Mahdi Army fort here – a portrait of Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. It was a gesture aimed both at paying lip service to moderate Shi'ite leaders and recruiting of a broader segment of Shi'ite for Sadr's swelling army. After four straight days of bloody battles in which an estimated 150 Shi'ites and about a dozen coalition troops lost their lives, Husseini's office hummed with activity. He handed out $100 bills to followers out of a bulky black plastic bag.
Wonder where that money came from?
Simultaneously, he dealt with a delegation of three Shi'ite tribal leaders urging calm. Scanning a fax, he begrudgingly acquiesced to their demands: that the Mahdi Army cease fire and allow police to return to their stations. In exchange, US tanks, guns pointed at Husseini's office 400 meters away, would leave, and no harm would come to Sadr.
I doubt we were included in this negotiation.
Sadr is wanted by the coalition forces both for links to the murder of another Shi'ite cleric last April and for fomenting the current uprising. To the press, Husseini vowed to step up the jihad "to the last drop of blood," even though "we are a peaceful group."
Oh, we can see that...
"The quiet you see now, during the day, is misleading. The Americans come at night, with tanks, and that is when the fighting takes place," he said. He made no mention of concessions, no reference to compromise.
Humm, is Sadr running the show or is it Husseini with Sadr as front man?
Why don't we nail one of them and find out?
Not that they have much choice. Coalition forces here have essentially given up negotiating with Sadr, essentially declaring war. For his part Sadr refused to back down, too proud to lose face among his people.
If he backs down now he's a putz and one of his own will bump him off. The penalty for failure is death. It's the code of Boskone... Or SPECTRE. Or one of those groups...
But sources in the Governing Council said late Wednesday that they are working on a plan to end the Shi'ite impasse. Shiekh Abdel Karim al-Mahameidi, a Governing Council member from the marshlands in the south, said his group would send a delegation to Sadr's base in Najaf on Thursday to stop the bloodshed. Just steps away from the Mahdi Army fort Wednesday afternoon, two old men leaned against a bullet-pocked wall. They were watching youths at the little compound's gates chant: "We will die for you, O Sadr."
Yeah. And "Saddam, we will defend you with our blood!" Where's Saddoun Hamadi these days?
"Really," said Kaddum Abdullah, who said he was 50, but looked 80. "We are tired from Saddam. The US came here to free us, so that is what we want them to do; enough of this fighting." A boy distributing posters of a scowling Sadr walked up and offered the men one. A reporter gladly took one and stuffed it into his bag. The old men politely declined. "No thank you," said the second man, "we see enough of him already."
Posted by:Steve

#18  PS-Better that we found out they were planning an Irannian style revolution the whole time, instead of after the elections when they really built up the militia.
Posted by: CobraCommander   2004-04-09 1:11:37 AM  

#17  We should not lay off the pressure while their recharging, they're not going to stop once their organized. We don't have much time left until we drop this in the lap of the new Iraqi government.

We haven't seen anything yet, wait until June or July when everyone under the sun is grabbing for power or contesting the election. We might as well hit these hostiles real hard and clean, right now.
Posted by: CobraCommander   2004-04-09 1:07:53 AM  

#16  They operate behind the innocent because they believe we will not risk killing them. This strategy is only employed against armies that have western values.

The correct response is the moab. Demonstrate there is no way to fight a moab, and civilian shields are not an effective strategy.

As for upsetting the people, these people lived through Saddam. They know whats at stake.
Posted by: flash91   2004-04-08 10:58:13 PM  

#15  Personally, I don't give a rats about being sennnnsitive (hat tip to Savage) with these idiots, but I also don't want to stir up more angst within the populace. Lux's link is a good indication of what I mean.

When we kill the civs, the locals get pissed. We just need to be careful and kill the fighters as much as possible. That is our current SOP. We need to stick to it.
Posted by: remote man   2004-04-08 4:51:37 PM  

#14  Lux - i guess they werent going to use weapons against civilians, purportedly carrying food and medicines (I presume ammo got in as well, but presumably nothing big)
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-04-08 4:50:56 PM  

#13  LH, if the following is true, then it appears that Fallujah is leaky - at least inbound. I hope they don't let these jokers back out, that would be adding insult to injury.
Posted by: Lux   2004-04-08 4:46:34 PM  

#12  SH - Marines have definitely cordoned off Fallujah, and it seems that US Army has cordoned off Sadr City. Not sure of other towns. An effective cordon will have to be more complete than just main roads, IIUC. That takes troops. I presume the commander on the ground will attempt to cordon off the biggest troop concentrations, then defeat the enemy in detail.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-04-08 4:34:50 PM  

#11  Look to pilgrims either re-inforcing Shiites in the mosque or acting as human shields.
Posted by: John Simmins   2004-04-08 4:28:55 PM  

#10  Yes! we are now the very model of a New Mahdi Army.
Posted by: Abu Cromwell   2004-04-08 4:04:23 PM  

#9  We certainly do not want the Iranian operatives Shiite pilgrims™ to miss their Monday love-in at Najaf and Karbala. I apologize in advance for my cultural insennnnnnnnnsitivity.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-04-08 3:43:47 PM  

#8  Remote Man, It seeme like the to CPA could just blcokade the few major roads headed into the holy cities out in a unpopulated area. I don't know th elay of the land, though.
Posted by: Super Hose   2004-04-08 2:30:42 PM  

#7  On FoxNews right now there's a NewsWeek reporter who's just left Najaf (wonder why?) saying that the Madhi's took some goodies from the Police stations there: guns, uniforms, and flak jackets, in particular.

This will make ID'ing the bad guys more difficult when the Shi'a's ding-dong festival ends and we move back in.
Posted by: .com   2004-04-08 1:26:51 PM  

#6  The most important holiday on the Shiite calendar occurs on Monday. The areas around Najaf and Karbala are going to be overrun with Shiite faithful. I heard that the CPA already said that they are not going to be able to provide security becuase of Sadr. They certainly don't want to carry out a major military campaign in the middle of this religous celebration. That would only kill a lot of innocent Shiites and hamper our ability to pacify that community in the future.

The money portion of the story is the last paragraph. The older folks are sick if the seethe program. They and most people want to get on with life. Be patient. We will deal with Sadr, but on our schedule, not his.
Posted by: remote man   2004-04-08 12:19:53 PM  

#5  I'm not sure I agree. Intel may have word that the Sadr brigade is running low of food, etc. in which case, a bit of waiting is in order. From everything reported so far, the sadr brigades are not super organized and may well be vulnerable to siege type tactics.
Posted by: mhw   2004-04-08 12:00:59 PM  

#4  Agree with you, Alaska Paul.

Ha! LOVED the last paragraph, though.
Posted by: ex-lib   2004-04-08 11:51:53 AM  

#3  Our armament needs to take out the office, no matter who is in it. Lop off the head, and the body will flop around and quiver until it quits. We must send an unequivocal and strong message now. Being nice and fair is being perceived as weak. Middle East Anthropology 101.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-04-08 11:48:42 AM  

#2  mjh - i saw a report this AM that Sadrs office in Sadr City was hit by choppers. Not sure if this is same as Husseinis office.
Posted by: Liberalhawk   2004-04-08 11:25:16 AM  

#1  Pray Tell: 1.) Why is the Mahdi Army's fortress still standing? 2.)Why are the tank guns, pointing at Husseini's office, not blazing?

What's with these restrictive rules of engagement?! The simple fact that 5 marines had to be shot yesterday before they were cleared to bomb the mosque perpetuates the myth that the US is not willing to do what is necessary to win this war!!!
Posted by: mjh   2004-04-08 11:23:10 AM  

00:00