You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: Politix
White House vetting could delay 9/11 report until after election
2004-04-06
This isn't going to go over well.
WASHINGTON (AFP) - The chairman of an independent commission looking into US counterterrorism activities prior to the September 11 attacks said he could not guarantee that the panel's report will be released before the November presidential election because of a protracted White House vetting process. Former Republican New Jersey Governor Thomas Kean said he was "surprised" by the situation, but saw no way around it.

The probe, which President George W. Bush initially opposed but later agreed to under pressure, has turned in to a political hot potato after former White House counterterrorism czar Richard Clarke accused Bush of doing a "terrible job" of fighting terrorism prior to the strikes on New York and Washington in September 2001.
If only we had all listened to the wise counsel of Richard Clarke, 9/11 ... would have happened anyway.
Appearing on NBC's "Meet the Press" television program, Kean said White House vetters will go over his report "line by line to find out if there's anything in there which could harm American interests in the area of intelligence." A special clearance team led by White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and made up of top US intelligence and counterterrorism officials has already been set up, he said.

But the report, expected to contain hundreds of pages of findings and testimony, is unlikely to be finished before July, according to congressional officials. That will leave the vetting team only three to four months to complete its work, if American are to see the document before they go to the polls on November 2. Asked if American will be able to see the report before the election, Kean answered, "I have no guarantees."
This is a mistake, but the Commission put them on the hot seat by delaying their report.
It took the White House close to seven months to clear a congressional report on US intelligence in the lead-up to the attacks. Moreover, the congressional account emerged from that vetting last July with dozens of blacked-out pages, which experts later said contained sensitive information about an alleged Saudi role in financing al-Qaeda and other radical Islamic networks.

Democratic commission vice chairman Lee Hamilton assured on the same show that the panel will not put up with any political editing of the document, saying, "We're not going to let them distort our report."
"No, no! Certainly not!"
Hamilton also expressed confidence White House vetters will focus on protecting intelligence sources and information collection methods rather than on the panel's substantive findings.

But reacting to the controversy surrounding the probe, the John Kerry election campaign released a compendium of press reports showing the president's lack of enthusiasm for the commission and its work since its inception. "Bush opposed the commission entirely, he initially didn't include funding they requested after they were established, he still has not provided documents the commission has said are necessary for their work," said the campaign of the lackluster presumptive Democratic presidential nominee who previously served in Vietnam.
Now the report is live through the election, and if Kerry has half a brain, he will bring it up every day.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  A2U - Hey, go easy - the OBL reference rate is .000267% (4 x 3 = 12; 12 / 45000), by gum! Messiah Clarke prolly advised double that and was over-ruled, I'd wager, and prolly even wanted AlQ mentioned once or twice! He's The Messiah - his book proves it - it's not his fault if his advice was ignored. I think we should cut him some major slack, don't you? After all, there's now buzz that Robert Redford will play him in the movie: I Almost Told You So - The Marginalization of The Messiah.;-)
Posted by: .com   2004-04-06 11:17:56 AM  

#3  Via Croooow Blog:

The final policy paper on national security that President Clinton submitted to Congress — 45,000 words long — makes no mention of al Qaeda and refers to Osama bin Laden by name just four times.

The scarce references to bin Laden and his terror network undercut claims by former White House terrorism analyst Richard A. Clarke that the Clinton administration considered al Qaeda an "urgent" threat, while President Bush's national security adviser, Condoleezza Rice, "ignored" it.


The Clinton document, titled "A National Security Strategy for a Global Age," is dated December 2000 and is the final official assessment of national security policy and strategy by the Clinton team. The document is publicly available, though no U.S. media outlets have examined it in the context of Mr. Clarke's testimony and new book.

The fact that it took this long for this to get out speaks volumes...
Posted by: Anonymous2U   2004-04-06 10:48:14 AM  

#2  If there's nothing in there, then after Kerry makes huge waves about it, the WH will release it before the election and stick it in Kerry's eye.
Posted by: Laurence of the Rats   2004-04-06 7:52:56 AM  

#1  But what if he has the other half brain?
Posted by: dorf   2004-04-06 6:54:23 AM  

00:00