You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
More US troops may be needed in Iraq - key senator
2004-04-05
The United States may need to bolster its troop presence in Iraq and extend the deadline for transfer to Iraqi rule, amid an insurgency that could lead to civil war, a leading Republican lawmaker said on Sunday. "It may be that we do need more troops ... because I think we have to have security (in Iraq)," U.S. Sen. Richard Lugar, an Indiana Republican and head of the Senate foreign relations committee, said on ABC television's "This Week." Lugar said he is worried that when the U.S.-led coalition turns over sovereignty to Iraqis on June 30, the new government will be unable to deal with the violence. "They're at a point in which clearly they can't control the situation," he said. "You have the militia that has not been disarmed, and if in fact the worst situation comes, the militia begin to fight each other, that is, civil war."
Which is why we're not leaving.
Former U.S. Secretary of State Madeleine Albright also said more U.S. troops were probably needed in Iraq, and the Bush administration should get other countries to contribute more forces.
Plenty of other countries there already -- oh, you mean the French?
"There has been, from the very beginning, a mistake in military planning, where the original forces that went in were potentially not sufficient," said Albright, appearing on the same program. "So there has been a complete mismatch between the military and the political planning in Iraq," she said. Lugar said he supported a proposal from Sen. Joseph Biden of Delaware, the top Democrat on the foreign relations panel, that calls for U.S. President George W. Bush to convene a summit with European leaders -- including those who opposed the war -- and repair the U.S.-European alliance. "He (Bush) should tell them that none of us can afford failure in Iraq," Biden wrote in a editorial in the Sunday edition of The Washington Post.
But Chirac and Zappy are counting on just that.
Biden's plan would also have the president seek a U.N. Security Council resolution to create a high commissioner who would be in charge of handling's Iraq's political transition, similar to U.N. arrangements in the Balkans and Afghanistan.
Yassss, the mighty UN. Look at the recent masterful job they've done in Darfur.
Posted by:Steve White

#4  Of Rats and Jews.
Posted by: James TROLL   2004-04-05 1:22:03 AM  

#3  Shouldn't have gone it; now we're there, we don't have enough. Yes, anon. Madeleine, stick a sock in it. You oversaw a lot in 8 years and you screwed up our getting Bin Laden. Why doesn't anyone ask her about that? We need more troops? Let's do it. Let's rev it up. Then please no complaining about how feelings of Fallujah residents will be hurt by what's coming down the track. There have been bad weekends and months before and will be others. (march deaths of our guys was double Feb.) Let's not go wobbly, though
Posted by: Michael   2004-04-05 10:40:17 AM  

#2  What a wonderful world it would be if the hideously stupid Albright SHUT ITS gaping MAW!!! Biden is an equally annoying slut. And Lugar is barely recogzizable as human. If either of the three stooges actually thinks IT has a better plan for Iraq, IT should have run for Commander in Chief. As neither of them had the balls to run for President, they should shut the HELL up.
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-04-05 7:36:54 AM  

#1  [Troll droppings deleted]
Posted by: Baker TROLL   2004-04-05 1:22:03 AM  

00:00