You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Israel-Palestine
‘First Thing We Do, Let’s Kill All the Leaders’
2004-03-31
Sarah Whalen, Arab News
“First thing we do, let’s kill all the lawyers,” cries Dick the Butcher, a rabble-rouser plotting to overthrow 15th century England’s King Henry VI in Shakespeare’s play. But after Israel’s ruthless assassination of Sheikh Ahmad Yassin, perhaps Shakespeare would have altered his famous line to, “First thing we do, let’s kill all the leaders.”
There's a difference between warfare and a play, even a play about warfare. But go on...
For this is exactly what Israel proclaims for all Hamas, Islamic Jihad groups, and even secularists like Yasser Arafat.
She's talking about the people who're making war on Israel and by extension on civilization...
Six months ago, Israel‘s Prime Minister Ariel Sharon declared that it had “marked” Yassin “for death.” Now, Israel has openly lengthened its “hit” list. Israeli Public Safety Minister Tzachi Hanegbi avows: “Everyone is in our sights.” And Israeli Defense Minister Shaul Mofaz declared that Israel’s “liquidating” has only just begun.
Seems like a reasonable attitude to me. People who're responsible for liquidating people on buses should be liable for liquidation themselves. It's only fair.
The Bush administration’s response to Israel’s open policy of indiscriminate assassination is akin to Shakespeare’s Cade, Dick the Butcher’s ruffian leader, who ponders the wisdom of killing “all the lawyers,” then agrees because lawyers are tricky and bad. Cade and Dick then scurry off and kill the clerk of court. Who was not a lawyer, but close enough.
The sheikh didn't toss bombs, but he sent people to do it. Close enough.
Back in the 21st century, US National Security Adviser Condoleeza Rice furrowed her brow, called for calm “in the region,” and then reprised Cade’s death-to-lawyers remarks: “Let’s remember,” former Stanford University Professor Rice lectured, “that Hamas is a terrorist organization and that Sheikh Yassin has himself personally, we believe, been involved in terrorist planning.” Not “terrorism” per se, but “terrorist planning.” Does this ring a bell?
Dang! It sure does! Like in The Godfather, when the Don doesn't bump people off, he has Luca Brasi do it. And then after Luca and the Don are both dead, Mike gets his own "Luca Brasi." Masterful!
Not “weapons of mass destruction,” but “weapons systems plans.”
Oh. Sorry. Thought you were making sense for a minute there.
Few contend that Yassin, practically blind, was an active terrorist himself. His crippled body confined him to a wheelchair and his reedy voice barely whispered. But he set an agenda long ago, and his refusal to compromise with Israel on any terms, and his demand of Palestine for Palestinians, marked him.
Actually, it was the bus booms. And the dead kiddies. You claim to be a lawyer, Sarah. You know that the guy that hires the button men is as culpable as the button men are. That's first-year law.
Israeli politicians claim Yassin actively sponsored suicide bombing. But even if true, Israel has no one to blame but itself.
That's a dumbassed statement if I ever heard one. But somehow in the Arab world the victim's at fault, unless the victim's an Arab. Seems to work that way in the lefty world, too...
In 1989, Israel had snugly imprisoned Yassin away for life, having tried, convicted, and sentenced him for complicity in the murder of Palestinian Israeli collaborators. In 1997, Israel agreed with Jordan and the United States on the exact value of Yassin’s life — two Israeli agents caught in a bungled attempt to poison a Hamas leader lawfully within Jordan, a country which enjoyed, in theory, a full peace with Israel. Then-King Hussein had reportedly telephoned the United States, and furiously threatened to execute Israel’s assassins if Israel did not immediately provide an antidote. In settlement of Israel’s egregious breach of Jordan’s sovereignty, Israel traded Yassin for the two Israeli assassins, whom Jordan had every right to execute. Deal done.
I agree. That was a crummy idea. It bought them no end of grief in the long run. But it's hard to let your loyal people get bumped off.
Now, following America’s invasion and occupation of Iraq, Israel decided its deal for Yassin looked less good than it had seven years ago.
That's because he went back to his old ways, only worse, killing people in droves...
And so, under cover of darkness for an even darker deed, before the daybreak had cleaved from the dark, Israel sent yet more assassins, armed with three missiles from a US-made Apache helicopter.
Wow! Is that prose purple! And nobody else makes Apache helicopters, so it's not necessary to refer to them as 'US-made." It's kinda redundant unless you're mindlessly trying to make a political point that has no meaning.
They swooped down from the sky as Yassin, family members, and others left a mosque after morning prayer, and blew them to bits.
Hurrah! Brain globules everywhere!
If democracy is to bring Dr. Rice’s “better day” to the Middle East, one must question how much the targeted killing of Middle Easterners by both Israel and the US is part of the plan.
My guess would be that the killing removed an obstacle, an enemy of democracy and of individual liberty. What's yours?
Although Rice claimed Israel had not “informed” the US “in advance” of its clearly long-considered murder plot, advance notice seems to have scarcely mattered.
It didn't. Sovreign country, taking action against its enemy. The Russians don't check with us, either. Neither do the Brits. Israel's not a U.S. colony.
One wonders whether Rice would have told the Israelis not to go through with the assassination. Or would she have warned Yassin, as US law requires, so as not to become part of Israel’s murderous conspiracy?
Guess we'll never know. Maybe that requirement for warning is why they didn't tell us. Or maybe because it was their business and not ours. We don't tell them when we're going to sweep Khost or Fallujah, either...
What should profoundly disturb us is that Israel’s “kill all the leaders” policy seems such a perfect fit with America’s own plans for the Middle East. We want to “hunt down” and kill Osama Bin Laden, virtually every Al-Qaeda member and every member of the Taleban.
That's because we're at war with them. Haven't you heard? They attacked us. They can surrender or die. Israel feels the same way about the Paleo thugs.
We have advertised bounties on many Iraqi former officials and has already hunted down and killed Saddam’s two sons. We would have likely killed Saddam himself if they had captured him before the war’s official end, when military law turns lawful “targeted killing” into cold-blooded murder. Dead or alive. But everyone knows that dead is easier.
Yeah, it is. It doesn't respond well to interrogation, though. And it would have been lawful and legal to have shot Sammy on the spot, since he was out of uniform and engaged in non-conventional warfare.
About Israel’s plans to murder Yassin, and then to murder again and again, until the last resisting Palestinian falls dead in Israel’s crosshairs, the greatest democracy in the world says ..... well, nothing.
This particular 1/285,000,000th of it says "Good idea!"
US Gen. Wesley Clark claims the Pentagon plans to invade, occupy, or otherwise pacify seven Middle Eastern states in five years. How to accomplish this? First thing we do, let’s kill all the leaders. It makes democracy so much easier to come by.
— Sarah Whalen is an expert in Islamic law and taught law at Loyola University School of Law in New Orleans, Louisiana.
What lucky students she had. Got a mind like a steel trap, she does...
Posted by:Fred

#9  Fred Pruitt, nine more Americans died today.

The truth will set you free.
Posted by: JD TROLL   2004-03-31 9:09:39 PM  

#8  This is the same maggot who glorified the 9-11 atrocity as a "Miracle of God," while simultaneously condemning Yassin's Hellfire Enema™ as "terrorism."

For starters, let's get this guy into solitary confinement on short rations with hard labor for a few months. Any more inciting of violence against American soldiers or citizens should result in years of imprisonment.

Posted by: Zenster   2004-04-02 11:37:22 PM  

#7  I about barfed when, at the very end of the article, we find that the lady was American! Whalen and the Arabs always think Israel is a US colony, a puppet. The reasoning goes--wipe out America and it's allies to get to Israel. But they don't even have to wipe them out. Just get them thinking like Sarah.
Posted by: ex-lib   2004-03-31 9:25:05 PM  

#6  "Israel agreed with Jordan and the United States on the exact value of Yassin’s life — two Israeli agents caught in a bungled attempt to poison a Hamas leader lawfully within Jordan, a country which enjoyed, in theory, a full peace with Israel."

What's the problem with Israeli agents trying to poison a Hamas leader lawfully? Oh, that's not what you meant to say?

Bimbo...
Posted by: JP   2004-03-31 7:46:39 PM  

#5  I agree...first kill all the leaders!
Posted by: mjh   2004-03-31 4:24:27 PM  

#4  She's bitchin' 'cause it's workin'. Hamas and Co respect power applied violently. Negotiation is considered a weakness. I am sure that the Israelis will negotiate with reasonable Palestinians if they ever surface after all the psychopath leaders are eliminated and the Paleos really want a negotiated peace.
Posted by: Alaska Paul   2004-03-31 4:22:28 PM  

#3  This mentality should be applied to Fallujah. Seal it off, conduct an operation to root out and capture the leaders of local resistance, and bump 'em off no questions asked.
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-03-31 4:17:55 PM  

#2   Wonder if she taught her students assassin derived from Islamic group that was founded to,um,er,"assassinate" Crusader leaders.
Posted by: Stephen   2004-03-31 4:04:48 PM  

#1  Excellent comments!

What really pisses the left and the islamo-fellowtravellers off is assassinating the terrorist leaders works. Not only has there been no sigificant terrorist attack since Yassin's assassination, the 'moderate' paleos seem to have found a voice and are denouncing terorism. Whether this does any good or not remains to be seen, but it is progress of a sort.
Posted by: Phil B   2004-03-31 3:54:17 PM  

00:00