You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front: WoT
Controversy About Really Deporting Aliens After Deportation Orders
2004-03-25
It really all began one sunny May morning in Tampa, Florida in 1997. Three Federal agents, one each from the INS, the FBI and the U.S. Customs Service, teamed up to knock on the apartment door of Mazen Al-Najjar. He answered, and the agents proceeded to serve a duly issued INS Form I-200 Warrant of Arrest in Deportation Proceedings. Al-Najjar was taken into custody without incident that morning, but the arrest would begin a chain of events that would garner international media attention, ibecome an issue in a Presidential election and have ramifications on the nation’s War on Terror.

Why was Al-Najjar’s arrest so significant? Al-Najjar had been identified in the ongoing Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) investigation in Tampa that began, at least on the criminal side, in late 1994 after the airing of the PBS special Jihad in America. Al-Najjar was an alien who was in the United States illegally, and he had been placed under deportation proceedings before his arrest that day in May but not detained. That was not an unusual practice, since there was pending litigation against him at the Immigration Court level. (His wife, also unlawfully in the U.S., and American citizen kids lived with him in Tampa.)

Once the Immigration Court ruled against Al-Najjar (and his wife), and ordered them deported, that changed his status from the perspective of the government. He was, at that point, an alien who had been found deportable by a judge and who had been denied all relief from deportation. Additionally, the government developed no shortage of evidence against Al-Najjar, linking him to the PIJ and other PIJ operatives. Some of that evidence was information the government did not want to reveal then because further investigation was continuing against other suspects, and some of it was classified.

A decision was made to detain Al-Najjar after the deportation order was entered against him by the Immigration Court, and to seek his continued detention, in part, based upon the submission of certain classified information to the Court. This was a rarely utilized process in deportation proceedings. However, it was entirely legal. What some of the government folks underestimated at the time was the extent of the reaction utilizing such a process would have among certain groups. Individuals and organizations sympathetic to Al-Najjar very quickly picked up the use of “secret evidence” as a cause celebre’, and the circus began. ..... read the entire article
Posted by:Mike Sylwester

#4  D'oh!
Posted by: Mike Sylwester   2004-03-25 6:57:32 PM  

#3  
And this reminds me how unhappy I am with Bush's new proposals regards Mexico's hordes.

I am dismayed by Bush's proposal.
.
Posted by: Homer Simpson   2004-03-25 6:43:39 PM  

#2  [Off-topic or abusive comments deleted]
Posted by: Anonymous    2004-03-25 12:27:02 PM  

#1  Good read, Mike - Thx!

Reno's behavior was reprehensible - as was Judge Lenard's. Surely there must be some redress available for such malfeasance and misfeasance. Slackers, both.

I always thought that the National Security Act statutes would be sufficient - apparently not, or they are for far more dire situations and cannot be triggered for some particular reason. Time for our legal beagles to take over and strut their stuff!

There is so much here that is relevant to both the WoT and the more mundane subject of ejecting the immigration lawbreakers that it's hard to see where to begin! We need a zero-tolerance approach - all the marbles are on the line. And this reminds me how unhappy I am with Bush's new proposals regards Mexico's hordes. Again, it's obvious that we are long overdue for a total overhaul of immigration law and enforcement policy - and once settled, adequate enforcement funding.

The election year is prolly a huge damper - the LLL crowd is scraping the barrel for boogeymen and this, as the article makes clear, would qualify in their tiny little looney minds. There is just no cure when the patient is willfully ignorant. Sigh.

Thanx, again, Mike. Excellent review and an eye-opener!
Posted by: .com   2004-03-25 9:57:57 AM  

00:00