You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Terror Networks
Al-Qaeda communique threatens US lackeys
2004-03-18
A statement attributed to Al-Qaeda has threatened "America’s lackeys" with attacks similar to those in Madrid last week, singling out Japan, Italy, Britain, Saudi Arabia, Australia and Pakistan, an Arab daily reported in its today edition. "To America’s lackeys we say: a lackey of America has destroyed his future by allying himself with the tyrant of the century," said the text signed by Abu-Hafs al-Masri/Al-Qaeda Brigades received by Al-Qods Al-Arabi newspaper.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#11  Yadda, yadda, yadda.

Put up or SHUT UP!
Posted by: Barbara Skolaut   2004-3-18 9:46:47 PM  

#10  "he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilization."

I think it was Kerry that said "I have a cunning plan." Or was it Baldrick, I always get those two confused.
Posted by: ruprecht   2004-3-18 12:13:41 PM  

#9  Running dog is a North Korean term, which have been scarcer than hen's teeth since the famine.
Posted by: ed   2004-3-18 11:51:28 AM  

#8  A Lackey (AKA "lick-spittle", AKA "varlet") is the indentured servant of a Knight. He's the one beating the coconut halves together.
Posted by: mojo   2004-3-18 11:30:09 AM  

#7  What's the difference between a lackey and a running dog? I keep getting the terms confused.
Posted by: Chuck Simmins   2004-3-18 10:02:27 AM  

#6  *whew!* At least they didn't threaten our lapdogs!
Posted by: Dar   2004-3-18 10:00:25 AM  

#5  I find irony in the fact that the socialists find themselves once again in the roll of the intelligencia and useful idiots whose (infidel) heads will be the first to roll should they ever achieve their goals. Only this time they are doing it for religious fanatics. snicker
Posted by: B   2004-3-18 8:57:05 AM  

#4  How ironic, though, that Al-Qaeda was dead accurate in its characterization of Kerry, in that "he and the Democrats have the cunning to embellish blasphemy and present it to the Arab and Muslim nation as civilization."

Hardly surprising, given Kerry's talent for embellishing bullshit and getting Americans to believe it.
Posted by: Dave D.   2004-3-18 8:23:33 AM  

#3  I think DPA forgot to close his comment with "/sarcasm off"
Posted by: Frank G   2004-3-18 8:09:51 AM  

#2  Surely you jest! Voting for Kerry is exactly what they want. But they realize saying so would be a sure way to keep him from getting elected. Its called reverse pyschology.
Posted by: Ben   2004-3-18 5:24:11 AM  

#1  The same statement pointed out how deathly afraid of Kerry and is all powerful diplomacy are. Appears they're so frightened of the prospect of a Kerry presidency that they made a public demand that we not elect Kerry because he would bring them to their knees.

Whew, thank god we have enemies that are generous enough to let us know how to beat them. Could you imagine if we didn't get this info and mistakenly went into the election thinking Bush and his "force" approach to terror were winning? That was a close one.
Posted by: Damn_Proud_American   2004-3-18 12:50:28 AM  

00:00