| Submit your comments on this article |
| Arabia |
| Rebellion brewing in Saudi city |
| 2004-01-28 |
| Hat tip to Instapundit! By JOHN R. BRADLEY FOR THE STRAITS TIMES The tiny city of Sakaka in the remote al-Jouf province that borders Iraq may seem an unlikely setting for the beginning of a revolution against the ruling al-Saud family. But one does not have to spend too long here to realise that this is what is happening. Al-Jouf has witnessed an extraordinary level of political violence in recent months. The deputy governor, say local residents, was assassinated. accidently shot by a group of armed men? Also shot down was the police chief, executed by a group of men who forced their way into his home. Even before these bloody incidents, the region’s top Syariah Court judge was shot down as he drove to work early one morning. Seven men have so far been arrested over the shootings, according to Saudi officials. They admit that the attacks are linked, and that the seven may have been aided by as many as 40 others. Elsewhere in Saudi Arabia, such violence could be put down to tribal feuds or the general lawlessness of a remote region. And there are also, everyone agrees, new social problems in al-Jouf, of the kind that is now plaguing this once crime-free Islamic state. Archaeological sites, defaced by the graffiti of the alienated, are also littered with the evidence of widespread drug abuse. But residents of the provincial capital Sakaka insist that the violence here is political. They say it stems from the fact that al-Jouf is the historic power base of the al-Sudairy branch of the royal family, which includes King Fahd and his six full brothers. Known as the Sudairy Seven, they include Prince Naif, the Interior Minister, Prince Sultan, the Defence Minister, and Prince Salman, the Governor of Riyadh. They make all the important economic and political decisions in Saudi Arabia, with the King’s favourite son, Abdul Aziz, standing in increasingly for his father. But all members of the vast al-Sudairy clan consider themselves, and expect others to treat them as, princes and princesses. When it comes to business and local government in al-Jouf, the clan has ruled the roost for the seven decades since the kingdom was founded. For more than 40 of those years, the governor was one of their own. But other merchant families and tribes which were prominent before al-Jouf was incorporated into the Saudi kingdom and al-Sudairy took over are rebelling. The five streets of Sakaka are now deserted after dusk. Since the series of killings, members of the al-Sudairy clan have not been able to venture out of their walled villas without an armed guard. Special security police in bullet-proof jackets and wielding machine guns man permanent roadblocks on the approach roads into the city. Outsiders allowed in are closely observed by secret police. On the odd occasion that the visitor is a Westerner, his car is tailed day and night, as much for his own protection as out of inveterate Saudi suspicion. The families and tribes here are exploiting the vulnerability of a perhaps fatally weakened Saudi ruling family to reassert their territorial claims over those of the al-Sudairy. As many as 60 per cent of Saudis identify strongly with a tribe. Since the increased instability following last year’s bombings in Riyadh on May 12 and Nov 8, the ruling family has been eager to show that it has the full support of the tribal sheikhs. But al-Jouf shows what everyone knows: that tribes will switch their ’allegiance’ as soon as it is convenient. Residents say the final straw was the build-up to the invasion of Iraq, when United States troops took control of the airport in the nearby Arar, the kingdom’s official border crossing with Iraq. This was deeply resented by all Saudis, but especially by al-Jouf’s residents, who have historic tribal links to Iraqis across the border. Many local officers in the Saudi army resigned at the time in protest against being relieved temporarily of their duties by US soldiers, say Saudi opposition groups. Hundreds, perhaps thousands, of Saudis have since sneaked across the border into Iraq to join the jihad against US-led occupation forces. A number have been arrested by the Iraqi police, who describe them as ’Arab Wahhabis’, in a pejorative reference to Saudi Arabia’s austere, jihad-oriented brand of Islam. Other Saudis have been implicated in suicide attacks in Iraq, including one that targeted the United Nations headquarters in Baghdad. Only four people have so far been caught before they managed to get into Iraq, according to official Saudi government statements, leading many to wonder whether the border guards in al-Jouf are turning a blind eye. The natives are restless |
| Posted by:Frank G |
| #8 Does the "brewing" happen before the "seething"? Or after? And where does "whining" show up in the process? |
| Posted by: tu3031 2004-1-28 9:41:17 PM |
| #7 This is actually the third time it's been posted. Next time I'll cut it... |
| Posted by: Fred 2004-1-28 8:38:48 PM |
| #6 I posted this a few days ago - here |
| Posted by: phil_b 2004-1-28 6:19:24 PM |
| #5 The famous Sudairi seven. For what it's worth, Crown Prince Abdullah's mom was not a Sudairi, but had tribal ties to the As-Sham region up north where the border stops going northwest and starts southwest. Naif and Sultan are said to have always eyed him suspiciously. What a state, but folks, it was always bound to happen, so why not now. I can only hope Condi is giving Bush the best info she can access, and I don't mean the CIA. |
| Posted by: Michael 2004-1-28 4:46:29 PM |
| #4 Well... I have been under the impression since the early 90s that the Saudis had a very low level rebellion brewing out in the provinces - we were told that when I went there in 94. Perhaps it's just finally catching up with them. Or worse, maybe someone is taking advantage of lousy/corrupt/nonexistent government combined with religious extremisn and feudal social conditions to establish a base for further operations. Not like that's ever happened before in a Muslim country... Mike |
| Posted by: Mike Kozlowski 2004-1-28 1:38:40 PM |
| #3 I left that in for that reason |
| Posted by: Frank G 2004-1-28 1:10:42 PM |
| #2 I saw the headline and I was excited. I saw the byline and my excitement subsided. John Bradley, f'cryin' out loud! I mean, a guy can hope a little, but . . . Bradley! Sheesh! |
| Posted by: Mike 2004-1-28 1:07:24 PM |
| #1 John Bradley used to write anti-American fiction at a Saudi paper. Now that he's writing for a Singaporean paper, he's writing anti-Saudi fiction. I think this guy needs to quit his day job as a newsman and concentrate on writing a novel, since his imaginative screeds are wasted on the news pages. |
| Posted by: Zhang Fei 2004-1-28 12:49:21 PM |