You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Europe
Surprise witness delays verdict in September 11
2004-01-22
More on Iranian connection to 9/11 - the defector now has a name - and a familiar one at that.
On what had been the eve of his widely expected acquittal, the trial of the second person charged by German authorities as an accomplice of the Sept. 11 hijackers was thrown into turmoil Wednesday after prosecutors disclosed the existence of a surprise witness purporting to link Iran to the hijackings. The mysterious witness, who goes by the name Hamid Reza Zakeri and claims to have been a longtime member of the Iranian intelligence service, is said to have told German investigators that the Sept. 11 plot represented what one termed a "joint venture" between the terrorist group al-Qaida and the Iranian government.
That one's a show-stopper...
Sources familiar with the witness’ story, greeted with pronounced skepticism by some German intelligence officials, say he also implicates the defendant, a 31-year-old former Moroccan student named Abdelghani Mzoudi, as a knowledgeable participant in the hijacking plot. "If the story was true, the consequences would be remarkable," said one senior intelligence official, who observed that the witness’ account comes nearly 2 1/2 years after Sept. 11, 2001, and "looks a little bit constructed."
Almost tailored, in fact...
Zakeri is not expected to appear in the high-security Hamburg courtroom Thursday, where officials of the German federal police, the BKA, have been summoned to explain why they believe Zakeri’s testimony is credible. Sabine Westphalen, a spokeswoman for the Higher Regional Court of Hamburg, said the five-judge panel that will decide Mzoudi’s fate had received a 30-page transcript of the BKA’s interview with Zakeri conducted within the past few days. Westphalen said the federal prosecutor had asked "to interrupt the hearing of evidence for 30 days in order to be able to examine the data of the witness and its reliability." No verdict is now expected before Jan. 29. The appeal to the court to consider Zakeri’s story amounts to a last-minute move by the chief German prosecutor, Kay Nehm, to preserve the fast-fading possibility of a conviction in what is likely to be the last trial in Germany of an alleged accomplice of the Sept. 11 hijackers.
I can understand why the cops and the intel services would want to keep him from having to appear in court. Iranian involvement would be a political and diplomatic bombshell — the sort of thing you'd want to have every duck in a row for. If it turns out to be true, vast international repercussions; if the guy's a phony, egg all over everybody's face...
In the first such trial, which concluded last year, another Moroccan student, Mounir al-Motassadeq, was sentenced to a maximum of 15 years in prison for aiding the Sept. 11 hijackers. Motassadeq admitted knowing some of the hijackers but denied any foreknowledge of the Sept. 11 plot, in which four airplane hijackings resulted in more than 3,000 deaths. Mzoudi has taken essentially the same stance. According to the German newsmagazine Der Spiegel, Zakeri reportedly said Mzoudi acted as the hijackers’ liaison with their al-Qaida support network. Until now, the case against Mzoudi has been entirely circumstantial, resting on evidence showing that he performed a number of logistical and "housekeeping" services for the principal hijackers, both before and after they left Hamburg to begin flying lessons in the U.S. The prosecution’s theory, not supported by any direct evidence or testimony, is that Mzoudi must have known why Mohamed Atta and Marwan al-Shehhi, believed to have piloted the two hijacked jets that struck the World Trade Center, had quietly departed northern Germany for Florida. In December, however, the Hamburg court ordered Mzoudi’s release from prison after being informed by the BKA that a confessed Sept. 11 co-conspirator, Ramzi Binalshibh, had told U.S. intelligence agents that those who did know of the hijacking plot had "never talked to others about the true operations or the establishment of a terrorist cell" in Hamburg.

Any credible evidence linking Iran to Sept. 11 would have immediate and profound repercussions for U.S. relations with Iran and the Muslim world. Bush administration officials have included Iran with North Korea and the former Iraqi government of Saddam Hussein in what they term the "axis of evil." The Tribune reported last year that Shadi Abadallah, a 26-year-old Jordanian who said he served as one of Osama bin Laden’s bodyguards in Afghanistan, previously told the BKA that one of the world’s most-wanted terrorists, Abu Musab al-Zarqawi, described by Secretary of State Colin Powell as an "al-Qaida associate," was closely allied with the Iranian government. Zarqawi, a one-legged Jordanian national who heads the al-Tawhid terrorist network, which some U.S. officials say is linked to al-Qaida, has been accused by the Bush administration of helping al-Qaida develop plans to attack the West with radioactive and other weapons of mass destruction. American officials, who say Zarqawi is responsible for the assassination of a U.S. diplomat in Jordan, have placed a $5 million reward on his head.

Kenneth R. Timmerman, a senior writer for Washington-based Insight magazine, said he interviewed Hamid Zakeri during several telephone conversations last summer and that the man "told a very credible story." Timmerman said he had been able to corroborate a number of the physical details provided by Zakeri concerning such things as the physical layout of the Tehran headquarters of the Iranian Ministry of Information and Security, or MOIS. According to an article Timmerman published in July, Zakeri said that he worked for the Iranians’ "supreme leader," Ayatollah Ali Khameini, and that he was present at two meetings between senior Iranian and al-Qaida officials in the months before Sept. 11. Timmerman said Zakeri had provided him a document purportedly signed by the Iranian intelligence chief, Hojjatoleslam Ali Akbar Nateq-Nouri, in May of 2001, ordering a strike at this country’s "economic structure, their [sic] reputation and their internal peace and security." Because the Mzoudi case is still before the German court, the CIA declined to comment.
Posted by:Dan Darling

#11  Knowing more about 9/11 would be nice, but probably not useful. Have the good patience to wait 50 years. We all have our own ideas about Saudi princes dieing of thirst, traffic accidents, and heart attacks. As well as Pakistani Generals dieing in plane crashes. But what use, other than personal validation, would having our suspiscions confirmed serve? Would it benefit national security, or help in winning the "WOT"?
Posted by: Vea Victis   2004-1-22 7:52:48 PM  

#10  The more I read the more sceptical I become. The only "evidence" for Zakeri's claim that Mzoudi was involved in the "logistics" of 9/11 is an encrypted email with blackened out sender, and only a copy of it is in the hands of the BKA. The translator can't read it. Zakeri claims to have received the mail from Iran in December 2003, and the mail echoes what Hamburg prosecution has said about Mzoudi.

I smell a rat here. The CIA didn't buy his story and refused to pay him. Zakeri turns to the French and they are not interested either. Now the Germans listen because they don't want Mzoudi to walk free.

I read that the chief judge seems to be very sceptical about Zakeri's credibility. The Mzoudi thing seems to be a little too obviously "out of the magical box".

That doesn't mean that Zakeri is lying. But I doubt that Mzoudi will be convicted because of Zakeri's hearsay. He never saw Mzoudi in Iran.

The whole thing raises a lot of questions though. What does the FBI/CIA know about Iran and 9/11? Did they send Binalshib's exoneration of Mzoudi to the BKA in order to achieve Mzoudi's liberty? So that they can bag him when Germany kicks his ass to Morocco?

After two years I think we should have a right to know more about 9/11 than we are told. That secrecy starts to piss me off. Who is protecting whom here? If a German court is trying a man who is suspected to have aided in the killing of 3000 people in the U.S. I expect more cooperation from the American side. These secrecy games can backfire easily.
Posted by: True German Ally   2004-1-22 2:40:32 PM  

#9  given the WMD issues, which have been blamed, fairly or not, on intel from defectors, theres going to be a lot of skepticism about anything coming from a defector on an issue as sensitive as this.


Lets hope the Iranians toss the black hats themselves, and we dont have to make the case.
Posted by: liberalhawk   2004-1-22 2:22:06 PM  

#8  The renowned German Süddeutsche Zeitung now confirms that it is indeed Zakeri.
Posted by: True German Ally   2004-1-22 1:54:10 PM  

#7  There is a lot of talk among Rantburgers (fries with that?) about how Syria is the next target. I doubt it. Iran is a real threat whose rapidly developing nuclear program has the clock ticking. They will, or should, be the next target. Syria can be squeezed by Israel and Turkey, we'll take on the black hats.
Posted by: remote man   2004-1-22 1:10:02 PM  

#6  Consider:

In February of 2003 Zakeri told al-Sharq al-Awsat, "we had in our headquarters models of the [WTC] two towers, the White House, the Pentagon, and the CIA building at Langley".

Then in June he told Insight Magazine's Kenneth R.Timmerman, "It was a model of the World Trade Center, the White House, the Pentagon and Camp David."
Posted by: Robert Stevens   2004-1-22 10:21:15 AM  

#5  I think we will bide our time until shortly before or after the re-election of Bush, barring any further huge disclosures or acts by Iran. It'll be Mussolini-time for the blackhats...
Posted by: Frank G   2004-1-22 10:09:46 AM  

#4  Right you are,Dan.
Posted by: raptor   2004-1-22 6:43:13 AM  

#3   They're harboring al-Qaeda's leadership, they've sponsored attacks on both our troops (in Iraq) as well as strikes on our allies (in Turkey and most recently Israel). I would also argue that in light of the NATO Charter Article 5 if Iran is indeed responsibe for or complicit in 9/11 than Iran is at war with not just the US, but all of NATO as well.

I would have argued that Iran picked sides in this fight the moment they started letting al-Qaeda flee into its territory after the fall of the Taliban. Since then it's only been a matter of when, not if, the other shoe is going to drop.
Posted by: Dan Darling   2004-1-22 1:49:45 AM  

#2  TGA yes thats quite true course if what "Zakeri" says its true well thats tantamount to a declaration of war between Iran and the US isn't it?
Posted by: Val   2004-1-22 1:36:41 AM  

#1  Dan, the German protocol gives no names, nor does the Spiegel. That it is Zakeri is pure speculation for now.
Posted by: True German Ally   2004-1-22 12:44:25 AM  

00:00