You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
"I’m not going to start Third World War for you," Jackson told Clark
2004-01-16
Behind the scenes battle over Pristina airport between British and US genereals comes to light
Mark Tran
Monday August 2, 1999

Nato supreme commander General Wesley Clark is not being allowed to fade away quietly. Days after the Clinton administration relieved him of his command two months early, Newsweek is reporting that the victor of Kosovo was blocked from sending paratroopers to Pristina airport to pre-empt an unexpected Russian advance. Lieutenant-general Sir Michael Jackson overruled General Clark because the British commander did not want to spark a clash with the Russians. "I’m not going to start Third World War for you," General Jackson told the US commander, according to Newsweek. In the hours that followed General Clark’s order, both men sought political backing for their position, but only General Jackson received it.

News of the clash between the British and US commanders comes just days after the US snubbed General Clark by ordering him to step down next year, two months early, to make way for Air Force General Joseph Ralston, vice chairman of the joint chiefs of staff. The move is widely seen as a rebuke for the man who led Nato to victory, but who clashed repeatedly with his superiors because he favoured more aggressive tactics. General Clark, for example, pressed for the use of Apache attack helicopters, but his wish was denied amid fears of American casualties.

Trouble flared between the two men as soon as General Jackson was appointed commander on the ground in Kosovo. Talks on Russia’s role had broken down and the American general was so anxious to stop Moscow from stealing a march on the allies, he ordered British and French troops to take the airport. General Clark then asked fellow American commander Admiral James Ellis, in charge of Nato’s Southern Command, to land helicopters on the runways to prevent giant Russian Ilyushin transport coming in. However, Admiral Ellis also refused, saying General Jackson would not like it. The Russian planes were only prevented from landing after US officials persuaded Hungary to deny them permission to overfly the country. Both generals turned to their political masters for support, but while the British government backed General Jackson’s judgment, General Clark received no support, effectively meaning his orders were overruled.
Posted by:Yosemite Sam

#7   1)Clark wasn't relieved,he was asked to leave a few months early.That's what Clark tried to claim on Chris Matthews show recently.Guess being fired hurt his feelings.
2)The Apache episode was a major f***up as I recall.The DOD didn't want to send them,fearing high casualties(rightfully so IMHO).The stateside unit that was sent crashed a couple while training in theatre-heads should have rolled for that,and I don't recall any doing so.
Posted by: Stephen   2004-1-16 6:27:18 PM  

#6  Aside from the Apache's not being used, M1A1's were too big for the roads and bridges in most of the country, another intel screw up. In regards to my earlier comment, Clinton seems to back Clark politically behind the scenes right now versus the Deanster. Interesting turn of events.
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-1-16 1:55:14 PM  

#5  Clark's tactics seem sound in this situation. I can't really criticize the guy for this decision. But, as several others have said, the integrity remark is what bothers me here.
Posted by: mjh   2004-1-16 1:10:12 PM  

#4  4IV: The Apaches were sent to the theater (high in the Albanian mountains) but never used in combat. I am convinced that was due to foot-dragging on the part of the people in charge of the Apache unit, but I have no proof...
Posted by: Carl in N.H.   2004-1-16 12:30:28 PM  

#3  Yosemite Sam -- Thanks for posting this! I wasn't sure of the details, but was certain this was why he was booted out. Glad to see my years of hard partying studying in college didn't go to waste.
Posted by: Desert Blondie   2004-1-16 12:02:26 PM  

#2  General Clark, for example, pressed for the use of Apache attack helicopters, but his wish was denied amid fears of American casualties.

I hate to seem like I'm defending the guy, but didn't we end up using the Apaches over there anyway? Of course, good tactical sense doesn't have to translate into anything else. Sounds like weasel should have topped out at 2 stars with the cav.
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2004-1-16 11:55:35 AM  

#1  A paradox of sorts? Do we think Wes was bold and doing the right thing? Or, was he powertripping without seeing the big global strategic pic? Clinton didn't back him obviously, and being no fan of Clinton myself in regards to his handling of Military situations - would push me to think Clark may not have been all that crazy. Then throw into the mix Shelton's remarks about Clark's integrity being suspect. The plot thickens my friends..........
Posted by: Jarhead   2004-1-16 11:02:53 AM  

00:01