You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Korea
U.S. Is Korea’s Adversary?
2004-01-12
At least there’s one sane person left in Korea
A recent survey asked people which country they believes most threatens Korea’s security. 33 percent named North Korea, and 39 percent named the United States. Among people in their twenties, 58 percent said the U.S. was the bigger threat, while only 20 percent cited the North. If we were to act upon the results of that survey, then the U.S. should be considered the Republic of Korea’s main adversary, instead of North Korea.
Let's get the hell out, then. "Reunification" will come, and the Kim dynasty will have more land and more people to run into the ground. No skin off my fore...
This utterly amazing perception of our security situation by the people could, in certain circumstances, have frightful results.
Want to see what our back looks like? Want to see our favorite finger?
Diplomacy and security are areas of specialty, but they nevertheless work within the range of what is permitted by the people’s understanding of events and how they feel about them. History is full of episodes where countries have made poor diplomatic judgments, such as the choosing of allies and adversaries, and found their very existences threatened. We experienced a similar unfortunate turn of events one hundred years ago. The North Korean Workers’ Party platform supersedes the North’s constitution, and it calls for the communization of the South.
A mere technicality. I'm sure they don't really mean it.
Of the North’s more than one million regular forces, two thirds are forward deployed in a attack posture. The North is developing nuclear arms. Despite this, when it comes to the North Korean nuclear issue the government and various areas in our society have continued to unilaterally call for the U.S. to exercise self-restraint, instead of calling for the North to changes its ways.
They're not responsible for their own actions, right? Normally, that would make them either childish or insane. Quick now, which is it?
The airwaves are flooded with programs inciting anti-American sentiment, but it has become truly hard to find anything discussing the threat that is North Korea, from the perspective of security. In classrooms of all grade levels, the North is described as an object of reconciliation and cooperation, while the United States is always portrayed as belligerent.
When the last American troop's sailed away from the smell of kimchi forever, you can work that out, can't you? 1951 won't come again.
Many people are dumbfounded by these survey results, which can be said to be the necessary result of the unilateral direction of the comments and actions of our society’s learned individuals. Part of the reason for these mistaken views of the younger generation is the interpretation of history that is the backlash response of those who oppressed under the authoritarian regimes of the past. This deranged state of public opinion probably will not figure itself out easily, as some of the most representative figures of the same interpretation of history are honored as friends of the current government or social elders. But unless we set the people’s security consciousness straight by making the right choices of ally and adversary, there can be no telling when this country will find itself at a serious crossroads.
More importantly, it might find itself there alone.
Posted by:tipper

#4  how do you say adios! in Korean?
Posted by: B   2004-1-12 11:41:55 PM  

#3  Let's get the hell out, then. "Reunification" will come, and the Kim dynasty will have more land and more people to run into the ground. No skin off my fore...

I second this. Memory chips can be bought from other corporations, and can be fabbed in any other nation. It doesn't have to be South Korea.

The solution would appear to be: consult SK on matters of their interest.

I have a better idea: let them take complete care of the problem with no U.S. assistance in any way.
Let Kimmie take over and conquer the south, and see how all the anti-American protestors like living under a Communist dictatorship.

Oh, and the U.S. accepts NO Korean "refugees".
Posted by: Bomb-a-rama   2004-1-12 11:31:18 PM  

#2  I have read credible SK opinions objecting to US omission to consult with SK before implementing policies which affect SK security. Polled SKs appear to attribute US confrontation with NK, as incitement to NK belligerence with SK. The solution would appear to be: consult SK on matters of their interest.
Posted by: Wasserman   2004-1-12 11:23:51 PM  

#1  It's just a matter of time before the iraqis are taking lessons in ingratitude from the ROKs, french, germans, and phillipinos. I guess nothing makes a country hate you more than saving them from destruction.

What a bunch of sh*tballs. Remind me again why we even bother putting troops in Korea? Let's pull out and let them eat tree bark for a few years, see if their attitude changes.
Posted by: 4thInfVet   2004-1-12 9:58:40 PM  

00:00