You have commented 339 times on Rantburg.

Your Name
Your e-mail (optional)
Website (optional)
My Original Nic        Pic-a-Nic        Sorry. Comments have been closed on this article.
Bold Italic Underline Strike Bullet Blockquote Small Big Link Squish Foto Photo
Home Front
US expands the case against NY Yemeni
2004-01-09
The government expanded its case against three Yemeni-American men accused of illegally sending large sums of money to Yemen. Thursday’s indictment accuses Mohamed Albanna, Ali Albanna and Ali Taher Elbaneh of transferring $3.5 million to Yemen without a license between November 2001 and December 2002. The group initially was charged in 2002 with sending about $500,000 during a shorter time period. The new indictment also adds more charges that carry longer prison terms - 10 years instead of five - and adds a fourth defendant: a Yemeni man who allegedly received the transfers. A warrant was issued for the arrest of Abdul Wali Kushasha, assistant U.S. Attorney Timothy Lynch said.
If he's the receiver, that implies he's in Yemen. Good luck with the warrant...
Lynch said investigators have not traced any of the money to terrorist activities. Mohamed Albanna has said money was sent between family members in the United States and Yemen, where banks are not easily accessible. He and the others pleaded innocent.
If it's all innocent transfers to family members, then the charges should be dropped, as the offenses would be mere technicalities. But when you get into seven figures, that makes my ears perk up, and my ears aren't as sensitive as the FBI's and the IRS'...
The three original defendants, who are related, were arrested in December 2002. Mohamed Albanna, also vice president of the American Muslim Council of Western New York, said Thursday he learned of the new indictment from a reporter. "It’s not surprising," he said. The Albannas’ nephew, Jaber Elbaneh, a suspected member of a terror cell in suburban Lackawanna, was last reported to be in Yemen, according to U.S. officials.
That makes the "innocent, all in the family" claim look even more tenuous...
Six other Lackawanna residents, all Yemeni-American men in their 20s, were sentenced last month for attending an al-Qaida training camp months in Afghanistan before the Sept. 11 attacks.
Yet another family affair?
Posted by:Dan Darling

#4  Not being an Arabic speaker, I couldn't say for sure, but...

Going on transliterations from the news services is shakey. There's only one N in Elbaneh - should there be two, as in Albannah? And we've seen the GH -> H transliteration here a few times, the same name from different sources. Al-Ghamdi has also been rendered El-Ghamidi.
Posted by: Fred   2004-1-9 5:09:55 PM  

#3  That transliterated root would be (BNN), the L of course being part of the definite article (al-). And surely al-Ghamdi (with a ghayn, a laryngial consonant a long, long way from an H sound) cannot be transliterated al-Hamdi, except in error. Al-Hamdi is itself a not uncommon name. Finally, al-Ghamdi could become el-Ghamdi, but not el-Ghamidi.
Posted by: Anonymous   2004-1-9 3:14:34 PM  

#2  Looking at transliterated Arabic, you have to look at the consonants, rather than the vowels. The root (LBN) is modified by which consonants they hang on it. So Elbanah and Albanna are likely both variant spellings of the same name, as is al-Banna, al-Bannah, or even ul-Bonno.

A -> E shifts with dialect. The E is more prevalent the further west you go. Complicating matters is the fact that there are more consonants in the Semitic languages than there are in the Indo-European. H's are particularly awful; there are a couple variants that we'd represent with an H or a KH that actually sound like the speaker is choking. That's why you'll sometimes see al-Ghamdi, other times al-Hamdi. But el-Ghamidi's a valid transliteration, too.

Linguistics is not pretty...
Posted by: Fred   2004-1-9 11:00:09 AM  

#1  Family Affair? One could mispell Albanna with Elbanah? I say potAto, you say potato.
Posted by: john   2004-1-9 10:50:17 AM  

00:00